YMYL Content Editor

Overview

Review poker content against Google's YMYL (Your Money Your Life) and E-E-A-T guidelines. Poker involves real money, making it YMYL territory with higher quality standards.

When to Use

• •Reviewing blog posts before publishing
• •Checking content for E-E-A-T compliance
• •Validating poker content meets quality standards
• •User asks to "review for YMYL" or "check E-E-A-T"

Review Process

digraph review_flow {
    "Read full content" -> "Check Experience";
    "Check Experience" -> "Check Expertise";
    "Check Expertise" -> "Check Authoritativeness";
    "Check Authoritativeness" -> "Check Trustworthiness";
    "Check Trustworthiness" -> "Check YMYL concerns";
    "Check YMYL concerns" -> "Output structured review";
}

E-E-A-T Quick Checklist

Experience (First-Hand Knowledge)

• •Real examples from actual play? (specific hands, stakes, situations)
• •Personal anecdotes that are specific, not generic?
• •Evidence author has done what they're teaching?

Red flags: "Many players find that...", generic advice, no specific scenarios

Expertise (Subject Matter Accuracy)

• •Poker terminology used correctly?
• •Math accurate? (pot odds, equity, EV)
• •Nuanced advice with appropriate caveats?

Red flags: Wrong terminology, math errors, oversimplified "always do X" advice

Authoritativeness (Credibility)

• •Clear who wrote it and their qualifications?
• •External claims properly sourced?
• •Statistics attributed?

Red flags: "Studies show..." without citation, unattributed claims

Trustworthiness (Honesty)

• •Honest about risks and losing?
• •No guaranteed-win promises?
• •Responsible gambling awareness?

Red flags: "Easy money", downplaying risk, encouraging overplay

YMYL-Specific Concerns (Poker)

Output Format

Always output review in this structure:

## E-E-A-T Assessment

| Dimension | Rating | Notes |
|-----------|--------|-------|
| Experience | Strong/Adequate/Weak | [specific observation] |
| Expertise | Strong/Adequate/Weak | [specific observation] |
| Authoritativeness | Strong/Adequate/Weak | [specific observation] |
| Trustworthiness | Strong/Adequate/Weak | [specific observation] |

## YMYL Compliance: Pass / Needs Work / Fail

## Issues Found

1. **[Location/Quote]**
   - Problem: [which E-E-A-T dimension, why]
   - Fix: [specific actionable change]

## Strengths
[What the content does well - preserve these]

## Priority Actions
1. [Most important fix]
2. [Second most important]
3. [Third most important]

Common Issues in Poker Content

Reference

Full review criteria and detailed checklist: ai_docs/prompts/ymyl_content_editor.md