Story Critic Skill
Purpose
Provide rigorous quality assessment with veto power. Identify weaknesses, clichés, and gaps before proceeding to visual development.
Trigger
SCRIPT_EP{{XX}}.md has been refined by dialogue-doctor.
Inputs Required
- •All story artifacts:
- •
CREATIVE_BRIEF.md - •
LOGLINE_LOCK.md - •
CHARACTER_SHEETS/*.md - •
EP{{XX}}_BEATS.md - •
SCRIPTS/SCRIPT_EP{{XX}}.md
- •
Outputs Produced
- •
CRITIQUE_REPORT_EP{{XX}}.md - •PASS/FAIL decision for Gate 5
Process
Step 1: Promise vs. Delivery Check
Compare LOGLINE_LOCK.md promises to script delivery:
| Promise | Delivered? | Where? | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genre | |||
| Protagonist flaw tested | |||
| Relationship stakes | |||
| Tone matched |
Step 2: Character Consistency Audit
For each major character, verify:
| Check | ALICE | BOB | ... |
|---|---|---|---|
| Want pursued in script? | |||
| Lie challenged? | |||
| Voice consistent? | |||
| Causes problem(s)? | |||
| Has surprising moment? | |||
| Relationship failing shown? |
Step 3: Structure Analysis
Pacing Score (1-10):
| Element | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Cold open hook | ||
| Act 1 setup efficiency | ||
| Midpoint impact | ||
| Act 3 escalation | ||
| Climax payoff | ||
| Resolution satisfaction |
Act-Out Strength (1-10):
| Act | Strength | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 3 | ||
| 4 |
Step 4: Cliché Detection
Scan for and flag:
Dialogue Clichés:
- •"We need to talk"
- •"It's not what it looks like"
- •"You don't understand"
- •"I can explain"
- •Character says their own theme
Plot Clichés:
- •Ticking clock appears in final act (if not earned)
- •Villain explains plan
- •Last-minute save by new information
- •Character "just happens" to overhear
- •It was all a dream/simulation
Character Clichés:
- •Detective with drinking problem (unless subverted)
- •Mentor dies
- •Villain was friend all along (unless planted)
- •Character has dead spouse/child motivation
Score: {{COUNT}} clichés detected
Step 5: Theme Integration Assessment
| Element | Theme Present? | How Expressed? |
|---|---|---|
| A-Story | ||
| B-Story | ||
| Protagonist arc | ||
| Key dialogue moments | ||
| Visual motifs noted |
Theme Score (1-10): Is theme present without being preachy?
Step 6: Relationship Arc Verification
Cross-reference RELATIONSHIP_MAP with script:
| Pair | Axis | Change Planned | Change Shown | Earned? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Minimum requirement: 2 axis changes, 1 negative
Step 7: Visual Storytelling Assessment
Does the script:
- •Show rather than tell?
- •Include meaningful visual details?
- •Have filmable action (not just dialogue)?
- •Create memorable images?
- •Support later shot generation?
Visual Score (1-10):
Step 8: Anti-Pattern Check
Mushy Scenes (no clear GOTC):
- •Scene {{XX}}: {{PROBLEM}}
Static Scenes (no change):
- •Scene {{XX}}: {{PROBLEM}}
Exposition Dumps:
- •Scene {{XX}}: {{PROBLEM}}
Talking Heads (no action/movement):
- •Scene {{XX}}: {{PROBLEM}}
Step 9: Rubric Scoring
| Category | Weight | Score (1-10) | Weighted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Logline Promise Delivery | 15% | ||
| Character Consistency | 15% | ||
| Structure & Pacing | 20% | ||
| Dialogue Quality | 15% | ||
| Theme Integration | 10% | ||
| Visual Storytelling | 10% | ||
| Originality (anti-cliché) | 10% | ||
| Relationship Arcs | 5% | ||
| TOTAL | 100% |
Pass Threshold: 70/100 Current Score: {{SCORE}}/100
Step 10: Verdict
☐ PASS - Proceed to visual development ☐ CONDITIONAL PASS - Proceed with noted fixes ☐ FAIL - Return to {{SKILL}} for revision
Critique Report Format
# Critique Report: EP{{XX}}
## Verdict: {{PASS/CONDITIONAL/FAIL}}
## Score: {{XX}}/100
### Strengths
1. {{STRENGTH}}
2. {{STRENGTH}}
3. {{STRENGTH}}
### Critical Issues (Must Fix)
1. {{ISSUE}} - {{SOLUTION}}
2. {{ISSUE}} - {{SOLUTION}}
### Recommended Improvements (Should Fix)
1. {{IMPROVEMENT}}
2. {{IMPROVEMENT}}
### Minor Notes (Could Fix)
1. {{NOTE}}
### Clichés Detected
- {{CLICHÉ}} at {{LOCATION}} - {{SUGGESTED_FIX}}
### Scene-by-Scene Notes
- SC{{XX}}: {{NOTE}}
### Return To
{{WHICH_SKILL_FOR_REVISION_IF_ANY}}
Veto Conditions
Automatic FAIL if:
- •Protagonist flaw is not tested
- •No relationship stakes present
- •Climax doesn't address central conflict
- •More than 5 unaddressed clichés
- •Theme is absent or preachy
- •Characters are indistinguishable in dialogue
Notes
- •Be rigorous but constructive
- •Every criticism needs a suggested path forward
- •Celebrate what works—don't only find problems
- •Remember the goal is IMPROVEMENT, not perfection
- •First draft rarely passes—that's normal
- •Trust the process: critique → revision → critique