AgentSkillsCN

Story Critic

故事评论家

SKILL.md

Story Critic Skill

Purpose

Provide rigorous quality assessment with veto power. Identify weaknesses, clichés, and gaps before proceeding to visual development.

Trigger

SCRIPT_EP{{XX}}.md has been refined by dialogue-doctor.

Inputs Required

  • All story artifacts:
    • CREATIVE_BRIEF.md
    • LOGLINE_LOCK.md
    • CHARACTER_SHEETS/*.md
    • EP{{XX}}_BEATS.md
    • SCRIPTS/SCRIPT_EP{{XX}}.md

Outputs Produced

  • CRITIQUE_REPORT_EP{{XX}}.md
  • PASS/FAIL decision for Gate 5

Process

Step 1: Promise vs. Delivery Check

Compare LOGLINE_LOCK.md promises to script delivery:

PromiseDelivered?Where?Notes
Genre
Protagonist flaw tested
Relationship stakes
Tone matched

Step 2: Character Consistency Audit

For each major character, verify:

CheckALICEBOB...
Want pursued in script?
Lie challenged?
Voice consistent?
Causes problem(s)?
Has surprising moment?
Relationship failing shown?

Step 3: Structure Analysis

Pacing Score (1-10):

ElementScoreNotes
Cold open hook
Act 1 setup efficiency
Midpoint impact
Act 3 escalation
Climax payoff
Resolution satisfaction

Act-Out Strength (1-10):

ActStrengthWhy
1
2
3
4

Step 4: Cliché Detection

Scan for and flag:

Dialogue Clichés:

  • "We need to talk"
  • "It's not what it looks like"
  • "You don't understand"
  • "I can explain"
  • Character says their own theme

Plot Clichés:

  • Ticking clock appears in final act (if not earned)
  • Villain explains plan
  • Last-minute save by new information
  • Character "just happens" to overhear
  • It was all a dream/simulation

Character Clichés:

  • Detective with drinking problem (unless subverted)
  • Mentor dies
  • Villain was friend all along (unless planted)
  • Character has dead spouse/child motivation

Score: {{COUNT}} clichés detected

Step 5: Theme Integration Assessment

ElementTheme Present?How Expressed?
A-Story
B-Story
Protagonist arc
Key dialogue moments
Visual motifs noted

Theme Score (1-10): Is theme present without being preachy?

Step 6: Relationship Arc Verification

Cross-reference RELATIONSHIP_MAP with script:

PairAxisChange PlannedChange ShownEarned?

Minimum requirement: 2 axis changes, 1 negative

Step 7: Visual Storytelling Assessment

Does the script:

  • Show rather than tell?
  • Include meaningful visual details?
  • Have filmable action (not just dialogue)?
  • Create memorable images?
  • Support later shot generation?

Visual Score (1-10):

Step 8: Anti-Pattern Check

Mushy Scenes (no clear GOTC):

  • Scene {{XX}}: {{PROBLEM}}

Static Scenes (no change):

  • Scene {{XX}}: {{PROBLEM}}

Exposition Dumps:

  • Scene {{XX}}: {{PROBLEM}}

Talking Heads (no action/movement):

  • Scene {{XX}}: {{PROBLEM}}

Step 9: Rubric Scoring

CategoryWeightScore (1-10)Weighted
Logline Promise Delivery15%
Character Consistency15%
Structure & Pacing20%
Dialogue Quality15%
Theme Integration10%
Visual Storytelling10%
Originality (anti-cliché)10%
Relationship Arcs5%
TOTAL100%

Pass Threshold: 70/100 Current Score: {{SCORE}}/100

Step 10: Verdict

☐ PASS - Proceed to visual development ☐ CONDITIONAL PASS - Proceed with noted fixes ☐ FAIL - Return to {{SKILL}} for revision

Critique Report Format

markdown
# Critique Report: EP{{XX}}

## Verdict: {{PASS/CONDITIONAL/FAIL}}
## Score: {{XX}}/100

### Strengths
1. {{STRENGTH}}
2. {{STRENGTH}}
3. {{STRENGTH}}

### Critical Issues (Must Fix)
1. {{ISSUE}} - {{SOLUTION}}
2. {{ISSUE}} - {{SOLUTION}}

### Recommended Improvements (Should Fix)
1. {{IMPROVEMENT}}
2. {{IMPROVEMENT}}

### Minor Notes (Could Fix)
1. {{NOTE}}

### Clichés Detected
- {{CLICHÉ}} at {{LOCATION}} - {{SUGGESTED_FIX}}

### Scene-by-Scene Notes
- SC{{XX}}: {{NOTE}}

### Return To
{{WHICH_SKILL_FOR_REVISION_IF_ANY}}

Veto Conditions

Automatic FAIL if:

  • Protagonist flaw is not tested
  • No relationship stakes present
  • Climax doesn't address central conflict
  • More than 5 unaddressed clichés
  • Theme is absent or preachy
  • Characters are indistinguishable in dialogue

Notes

  • Be rigorous but constructive
  • Every criticism needs a suggested path forward
  • Celebrate what works—don't only find problems
  • Remember the goal is IMPROVEMENT, not perfection
  • First draft rarely passes—that's normal
  • Trust the process: critique → revision → critique