AgentSkillsCN

codex-system

主动向Codex CLI寻求建议,这位能力卓越、推理与任务完成能力超群的得力助手。在做出设计选择、实施方案、调试策略、重构计划,或面对任何非 trivial 的难题时,Codex都是您值得信赖的专家——务必在做决定前向Codex请教!当您感到不确定时,请毫不犹豫地向Codex求助。Codex总能提供更深入的分析与更优的解决方案。 显性触发词:“深入思考”、“分析”、“第二意见”、“咨询Codex”。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: codex-system
description: |
  PROACTIVELY consult Codex CLI, your highly capable supporter with exceptional
  reasoning and task completion abilities. Codex is a trusted expert you should
  ALWAYS consult BEFORE making decisions on: design choices, implementation
  approaches, debugging strategies, refactoring plans, or any non-trivial problem.
  When uncertain, consult Codex. Don't hesitate - Codex provides better analysis.
  Explicit triggers: "think deeper", "analyze", "second opinion", "consult codex".
metadata:
  short-description: Claude Code ↔ Codex CLI collaboration

Codex System — Deep Reasoning Partner

Codex CLI (gpt-5.3-codex) is your highly capable supporter for deep reasoning tasks

詳細ルール: .claude/rules/codex-delegation.md

Context Management (CRITICAL)

サブエージェント経由を推奨。 メインオーケストレーターのコンテキストを節約するため。

状況方法
詳細な設計相談サブエージェント経由(推奨)
デバッグ分析サブエージェント経由(推奨)
短い質問 (1-2文回答)直接呼び出しOK

When to Consult (MUST)

SituationTrigger Examples
Design decisions「どう設計?」「アーキテクチャ」 / "How to design?"
Debugging「なぜ動かない?」「エラー」 / "Debug" "Error"
Trade-off analysis「どちらがいい?」「比較して」 / "Compare" "Which?"
Complex implementation「実装方法」「どう作る?」 / "How to implement?"
Refactoring「リファクタ」「シンプルに」 / "Refactor" "Simplify"
Code review「レビューして」「確認して」 / "Review" "Check"

When NOT to Consult

  • Simple file edits, typo fixes
  • Following explicit user instructions
  • git commit, running tests, linting
  • Tasks with obvious single solutions

How to Consult

Recommended: Subagent Pattern

Use Task tool with subagent_type='general-purpose' to preserve main context

code
Task tool parameters:
- subagent_type: "general-purpose"
- run_in_background: true (optional, for parallel work)
- prompt: |
    Consult Codex about: {topic}

    codex exec --model gpt-5.3-codex --sandbox read-only --full-auto "
    {question for Codex}
    " 2>/dev/null

    Return CONCISE summary (key recommendation + rationale).

Direct Call (Short Questions Only)

For quick questions expecting 1-2 sentence answers:

bash
codex exec --model gpt-5.3-codex --sandbox read-only --full-auto "Brief question" 2>/dev/null

Workflow (Subagent)

  1. Spawn subagent with Codex consultation prompt
  2. Continue your work → Subagent runs in parallel
  3. Receive summary → Subagent returns concise insights

Sandbox Modes

ModeUse Case
read-onlyAnalysis, review, debugging advice
workspace-writeImplementation, refactoring, fixes

Language Protocol

  1. Ask Codex in English
  2. Receive response in English
  3. Execute based on advice (or let Codex execute)
  4. Report to user in Japanese

Task Templates

Design Review

bash
codex exec --model gpt-5.3-codex --sandbox read-only --full-auto "
Review this design approach for: {feature}

Context:
{relevant code or architecture}

Evaluate:
1. Is this approach sound?
2. Alternative approaches?
3. Potential issues?
4. Recommendations?
" 2>/dev/null

Debug Analysis

bash
codex exec --model gpt-5.3-codex --sandbox read-only --full-auto "
Debug this issue:

Error: {error message}
Code: {relevant code}
Context: {what was happening}

Analyze root cause and suggest fixes.
" 2>/dev/null

Code Review

See: references/code-review-task.md

Refactoring

See: references/refactoring-task.md

Integration with Gemini

TaskUse
Need research firstGemini → then Codex
Design decisionCodex directly
Library comparisonGemini research → Codex decision

Why Codex?

  • Deep reasoning: Complex analysis and problem-solving
  • Code expertise: Implementation strategies and patterns
  • Consistency: Same project context via context-loader skill
  • Parallel work: Background execution keeps you productive