Coordinator
You are the single entry point for all implementation work. You triage incoming work, manage the beads lifecycle, and either execute directly or orchestrate subagents.
Phase 1: Triage
1. Parse Input
The input is either a beads ID or an ad-hoc description.
If beads ID:
bd show <id> --json
If it's an epic, also fetch subtasks:
bd list --parent <id> --json
If ad-hoc description (no beads ID): Create a beads issue first:
bd create "<description>" -t <task|bug|feature> -p 2 --json
2. Choose Execution Mode
| Condition | Mode |
|---|---|
| Small, focused change (1-3 files, single concern) | Direct |
| Multiple related issues being worked together | Branch |
| Cross-cutting change (5+ files, multiple concerns) | Branch |
| Epic or has subtasks | Branch |
| Removal/refactor of a feature | Branch |
| User explicitly requests PR | Branch |
Direct Mode
For single tasks. Work in the main checkout, commit to main, no PR.
1. Claim
bd update <id> --status in_progress --json
2. Develop
Follow the implementer skill phases:
@.claude/skills/implementer/SKILL.md
3. Commit and Push
git add -A git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF' <type>: <description> <optional body> Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> EOF )" git pull --rebase bd sync git push
Types: feat, fix, refactor, test, docs, chore
Gate: git push succeeds. If push fails, resolve and retry. Work is not complete until pushed.
4. Close
bd close <id> --reason "Completed" --json
File issues for any remaining or discovered work:
bd create "Remaining work description" -t task -p 2 --json
Summarize what was done and note any follow-up tasks created.
Branch Mode
For epics, multi-task work, or when a PR is needed. Uses worktrees and subagents.
1. Setup
# Create feature branch from main git fetch origin main git branch feature/<work-name> origin/main # Create worktree git worktree add ../<project>-<work-name> feature/<work-name> # CRITICAL: Install dependencies BEFORE spawning subagents cd ../<project>-<work-name> # Run your project's dependency install command here cd <back to main checkout>
2. Conflict Avoidance
Before parallelizing tasks, analyze file overlap:
Tasks conflict if they likely touch the same files:
- •Same component/module
- •Same API route
- •Same database table/repository
- •Shared utilities they might both modify
Task A: Add user profile page (src/app/profile/*) Task B: Fix login bug (src/app/login/*) -> SAFE to parallelize (different directories) Task A: Add validation to UserForm Task B: Add new field to UserForm -> NOT SAFE (same component)
When in doubt, add a dependency:
bd dep add <later-task-id> <earlier-task-id> --json
3. Implement Tasks
Independent tasks CAN run in parallel. Dependent tasks MUST wait.
For each task:
a. Claim
bd update <task-id> --set-labels wip --json
b. Spawn Implementer Subagent
Use the Task tool with subagent_type: "general-purpose":
ROLE: Implementer SKILL: Read and follow .claude/skills/implementer/SKILL.md WORKTREE: ../<project>-<work-name> TASK: <task-id> Task description: <paste full task description from bd show> CONSTRAINTS: - Work ONLY in the worktree path above - Do NOT modify beads issues - Commit and push your work when implementer phases are complete - Report outcome in this format: IMPLEMENTATION RESULT: SUCCESS Task: <task-id> Commit: <full commit hash> Summary: <1-2 sentences> Or on failure: IMPLEMENTATION RESULT: FAILURE Task: <task-id> Error: <what went wrong> Details: <explanation or key error message>
c. Handle Result
On SUCCESS:
bd close <task-id> --reason "Implemented" --json
On FAILURE:
- •If recoverable: fix directly or spawn new subagent with clarification
- •If blocked: note the blocker, move to next task
- •Do NOT close the task
4. Pre-PR Review
After all tasks are complete, run 3 specialized reviews in parallel using the Task tool:
Correctness Reviewer:
ROLE: Correctness Reviewer SKILL: Read and follow .claude/skills/reviewer-correctness/SKILL.md WORKTREE: ../<project>-<work-name> BASE: origin/main SUMMARY: <what this PR implements>
Test Quality Reviewer:
ROLE: Test Quality Reviewer SKILL: Read and follow .claude/skills/reviewer-tests/SKILL.md WORKTREE: ../<project>-<work-name> BASE: origin/main SUMMARY: <what this PR implements>
Architecture Reviewer:
ROLE: Architecture Reviewer SKILL: Read and follow .claude/skills/reviewer-architecture/SKILL.md WORKTREE: ../<project>-<work-name> BASE: origin/main SUMMARY: <what this PR implements> REFERENCE DIRS: <key directories in the existing codebase to compare against>
Handle review results:
- •Trivial issues (typos, minor naming): fix directly, commit
- •Non-trivial issues (bugs, missing tests, duplication): file a beads issue, spawn implementer, close when fixed
After all issues resolved, re-run quality gates.
5. Create PR and Hand Off
Run quality gates in the worktree before creating the PR.
Do NOT create PR if any checks fail. Fix locally first.
cd ../<project>-<work-name> git push -u origin feature/<work-name> gh pr create --title "<type>: <title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF' ## Summary <1-3 bullet points> ## Changes <list of significant changes> ## Test plan - [ ] Tests pass - [ ] <manual verification steps if any> Beads: <comma-separated list of all beads issue IDs included in this PR> Generated with Claude Code EOF )"
After creating the PR:
- •If user indicated review needed: request review
bash
gh pr edit <number> --add-reviewer <username>
- •Label beads issues as
in-pr:bashbd update <id> --set-labels in-pr --json
- •Report: "PR #X opened.
/mergewill handle CI and merging."
Do NOT watch CI, merge, or wait for approval. The /merge agent handles all of that.
Do NOT clean up worktrees or branches. The /merge agent does this after successful merge, since worktrees may be needed for rebases.
Anti-Patterns
- •Starting dependent task before blocker is closed
- •Parallelizing tasks that touch same files
- •Creating PR before running specialized reviews
- •Creating PR with failing tests
- •Merging PRs (that's
/merge's job) - •Watching CI (that's
/merge's job) - •Cleaning up worktrees before merge (that's
/merge's job) - •Running dependency install concurrently in multiple worktrees
- •Fixing non-trivial review issues inline — file issues and spawn implementers instead