Target Audience
Documentation serves two primary audiences:
1. Government Officials
- •Level: State department heads and senior bureaucrats
- •Departments: Environment, Tourism, Energy, Agriculture, Forest, Public Health
- •Needs: Evidence-based justification for policy action, clear recommendations, implementation guidance
- •Reading context: Decision-making on policy adoption and resource allocation
2. Academic Researchers
- •Level: Policy analysts, technical advisors, research institutions
- •Institutions: IIT, IISER, TIFR, environmental organizations
- •Needs: Rigorous citations, methodological clarity, data transparency
- •Reading context: Evidence evaluation, peer review, technical consultation
Writing Principles
Tone and Voice
Authoritative but Accessible
- •Third-person objective voice (API reference style)
- •Evidence-based assertions (every claim cited)
- •Technical terms explained on first use
- •Confident recommendations without overstatement
Guiding, Not Assuming
- •Explain reasoning behind recommendations
- •Acknowledge iteration and refinement process
- •Present options with trade-offs when applicable
- •Respect reader intelligence while providing context
Writing Quality Standards
Grammar and Clarity
- •Grammatically correct and properly punctuated
- •Complete sentences (not fragments)
- •Clear and unambiguous phrasing
- •Brevity valued, but never at cost of clarity
Active Voice (85%+)
- •Subject performs action: "The study documents..." (not "is documented by")
- •Direct and clear: "Maharashtra can implement..." (not "can be implemented")
- •Passive acceptable when: actor unknown, object more important, or describing system behavior
Present Tense (90%)
- •Current state: "Research demonstrates..."
- •Recommendations: "Policy should require..."
- •Future only for consequences: "This will reduce emissions by..."
Modal Verbs (Precision in Recommendations)
Use modal verbs to convey appropriate certainty and obligation:
| Verb | Meaning | Usage | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
can | Optional (40%) | Capabilities, options | "Municipalities can implement lighting curfews." |
should | Recommended (30%) | Best practices | "Policies should prioritize ecological zones." |
may | Possibility (20%) | Conditional outcomes | "This may reduce bird collisions." |
must | Required (10%) | Mandatory actions | "Protected areas must limit upward light." |
Avoid weak modals: might, could, would (use sparingly, only for hypotheticals)
Content Maturity Stages
| Section | Current Stage | End Goal |
|---|---|---|
| Research | Evidence compilation | Scientific foundation for policy |
| Policy | Recommendations → Refined proposals | Foundation for official policy |
| Pilots | Guidelines → Standards | Adopted implementation protocols |
Language reflects stage:
- •Research: "Studies document...", "Evidence indicates..."
- •Policy (early): "Recommendations include...", "Framework proposes..."
- •Policy (refined): "Notification shall require...", "Standards mandate..."
- •Pilots (early): "Guidelines suggest...", "Methodology encompasses..."
- •Pilots (refined): "Standards require...", "Protocols specify..."
Sentence Patterns
Subject-First Declarative (60%)
Light pollution disrupts nocturnal ecosystems. The UNFCCC recognizes lighting efficiency as a climate strategy. Maharashtra's protected areas face light intrusion.
Imperative Instructions (25%)
Review the ecological impact evidence in Section 2.1. Consider the economic burden documented by RAND Europe. Implement shielding requirements for coastal lighting.
Contextual Openers (15%)
When protecting migratory corridors, restrict lighting to essential safety needs. During pilot implementation, monitor sky brightness monthly. For agricultural zones, prioritize pollinator-friendly spectrum.
Paragraph Structure
Length: 2-4 sentences maximum Structure: Topic sentence first, then supporting details
Route middleware runs before navigation. Use it to check authentication or redirect users. Define middleware in the middleware directory.
Opening Sentences
- •Define what it is, its purpose, key benefits
- •Avoid: "This section describes...", "In this document...", "Let's explore..."
- •Instead: State directly what the content covers
Section-Specific Rules
Research Section (/docs/content/docs/1.research/)
Purpose: Global scientific evidence documenting light pollution impacts
Include:
- •Peer-reviewed studies with citations
- •Global data and international examples
- •Universal phenomena (ecological, health, climate impacts)
- •Maharashtra context ONLY in
::callout{color="info"}(1-2 sentences, factual)
Exclude:
- •Policy recommendations (belongs in Policy section)
- •Implementation details (belongs in Pilots section)
- •"Why Maharashtra Must Act" sections
- •"Next Steps" sections
Example structure:
## 2. Agricultural Impacts
Overview text without citations explaining the category.
### 2.1 Pollination
:cited[Light pollution disrupts nocturnal pollinator activity.]{#study-id} Research documents :cited[62% reduction in pollinator visits under ALAN conditions]{#another-study}.
::callout{color="info"}
Maharashtra's agricultural economy depends heavily on pollinator-dependent crops including cotton, pulses, and fruits.
::
Policy Section (/docs/content/docs/2.policy/)
Purpose: Legal frameworks, Maharashtra obligations, action plans
Include:
- •Constitutional obligations and legal precedents
- •International treaty commitments
- •State-specific regulatory frameworks
- •Recommended policy mechanisms
- •Justifications tied to Research evidence
Tone progression:
- •Early drafts: "Recommendations", "Framework proposes"
- •Refined drafts: "Policy shall", "Standards require"
Example structure:
## 2. Dark Sky Zones Framework This framework proposes classification of protected nighttime environments based on ecological sensitivity and astronomical value. ### 2.1 Zone Categories **Tier 1: Core Dark Sky Reserves** - Protected areas with <21.5 mag/arcsec² sky brightness - Minimal artificial lighting permitted - Examples: Bhimashankar Wildlife Sanctuary buffer zones
Pilots Section (/docs/content/docs/3.pilots/)
Purpose: Implementation methodology (not specific site listings)
Include:
- •Selection criteria for pilot sites
- •Measurement protocols
- •Stakeholder engagement processes
- •Monitoring frameworks
- •Institutional coordination mechanisms
- •Implementation phases
Exclude:
- •Specific site selections (too premature)
- •Detailed budget allocations
- •Named individual responsibilities
Example structure:
## 2. Site Selection Methodology Pilot zones should be selected using a multi-criteria framework balancing ecological sensitivity, astronomical potential, and implementation feasibility. ### 2.1 Selection Criteria **Ecological Priority** - Presence of light-sensitive species - Proximity to protected areas - Migratory corridor significance
Component Usage Patterns
Use the right component for the right purpose:
| Need | Component | When to Use | Example Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Key statistics | ::tip | Highlighting quantified findings | "Key Statistic: :cited[62% reduction in pollinator visits]{#study}" |
| Maharashtra context | ::callout{color="info"} | State-specific notes in Research | "Maharashtra Context: Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot..." |
| Background info | ::note | Supplementary context | Explaining technical terms or processes |
| Best practice | ::tip | Recommendations | Policy implementation guidance |
| Caution | ::warning | Potential issues | Implementation challenges |
| Must-know | ::important | Required actions | Mandatory compliance requirements |
| Success indicator | ::callout{color="success"} | Positive outcomes | "Dark Sky Conservation offers a 'quick win'..." |
Component Selection Guide:
- •Research section: Use
::tipfor key statistics,::callout{color="info"}for Maharashtra context - •Policy section: Use
::importantfor requirements,::tipfor recommendations - •Pilots section: Use
::warningfor implementation challenges,::tipfor best practices
Code and Data Presentation
Code Block Labels
Always include file paths or context:
```ts [nuxt.config.ts]
export default defineNuxtConfig({
modules: ['@nuxt/content']
})
```
```bash
npm install katex rehype-katex remark-math
```
Tables for Data
Use tables for quantified comparisons:
| Impact Domain | Key Finding | Relevant Departments | |---------------|-------------|---------------------| | Ecology | 62% pollination reduction | Environment, Agriculture | | Health | 40% CVD risk increase | Public Health |
Workflow and Skill Orchestration
When working on documentation:
- •Content Phase (this skill - docs-writer)
- •Determine section type (Research/Policy/Pilots)
- •Apply audience-appropriate tone
- •Follow section-specific rules
- •Structure content logically
- •Use active voice (85%+), present tense (90%)
- •Apply modal verbs appropriately (can/should/may/must)
- •Keep paragraphs 2-4 sentences
- •Citation Phase (refer to DOCUMENTATION_WRITING_GUIDELINES.md)
- •Wrap the cited claim or source name inside the brackets:
:cited[cited text]{#id} - •Multiple citations:
:cited[cited text]{#id1,id2} - •The text inside
[...]should be the fact, statistic, or source name the citation supports - •Example:
:cited[60% of invertebrates are nocturnal]{#holker-2010} - •Example:
:cited[The 2023 RAND Europe study]{#hafner-2023-insomnia-burden}quantifies...
- •Component Phase (refer to DOCUMENTATION_WRITING_GUIDELINES.md)
- •Select appropriate callout type (tip/info/warning/important/success)
- •Card groups, accordions, etc.
- •Internal links:
[text](internal:path) - •Glossary terms:
:defn[term text]{#term-id}
- •Math Phase (refer to DOCUMENTATION_WRITING_GUIDELINES.md)
- •Inline:
$expression$ - •Display:
$$expression$$ - •Escape dollar signs:
\$4.32 trillion - •Units:
$0.757\,\mathrm{tCO_2/MWh}$
Data Source
ALL quantitative data must come from: /Users/mac/Development/incubrain/product-validator/docs/MASTER_KEY.md
Never invent statistics. Never extrapolate data not in Master Key. If data is not available, note the research gap instead.
Common Writing Mistakes to Avoid
Voice and Clarity
- •Starting sentences with "It" or "This" without clear antecedent
- •Overusing passive voice: "is documented by" → "documents"
- •Stacking prepositions: "the value of the property of the config"
- •Weak language: "might", "could", "would" (use precise modals)
Word Choice
| Avoid | Use |
|---|---|
| utilize | use |
| implement | add, create, establish |
| leverage | use |
| in order to | to |
| due to the fact that | because |
Structure
- •Burying important info at end of long sentences
- •Overusing "Note that" (just state the fact directly)
- •Starting with meta-commentary: "This section describes..."
- •Paragraphs exceeding 4 sentences
Documentation-Specific
- •Mixing section types (policy in Research, evidence in Pilots)
- •Maharashtra content outside callouts in Research section
- •Citations before punctuation
- •Inventing data not in MASTER_KEY.md
- •Using em-dashes (—) instead of commas or parentheses
Quality Checks
Before finalizing content:
- • Audience-appropriate tone (authoritative but accessible)
- • Section rules followed (Research/Policy/Pilots)
- • Language matches content maturity stage
- • Active voice 85%+, present tense 90%+
- • Modal verbs used precisely (can/should/may/must)
- • Paragraphs 2-4 sentences maximum
- • All data from MASTER_KEY.md
- • Citations properly placed (after punctuation)
- • Appropriate component types (tip/info/warning/important)
- • No em-dashes (—)
- • No H1 title duplication from frontmatter
- • No weak modals (might/could/would)
- • No starting with "It" or "This" without clear referent
- • Technical validation passes (citations, components, math) completed
Related Guidelines
This skill focuses on content strategy and audience. The guidelines document handles technical syntax.