Brand Voice & Tone Analysis
This skill teaches Claude how to analyse brand voice and content strategy from scraped website text. The analysis produces a structured voice profile usable for content creation and brand guidelines.
Analysis Framework
Step 1: Content Collection
Categorise all scraped text into:
- •Headings (h1–h6): Brand messaging hierarchy
- •Body copy: Communication style and complexity
- •CTAs: Action language patterns
- •Navigation labels: Information architecture language
- •Form labels & placeholders: Instructional tone
- •Footer content: Legal/formal register
- •Error messages & empty states: Empathy and helpfulness
- •Microcopy: Tooltips, badges, status text
Step 2: Tone Dimension Analysis
Rate each dimension on a 1–10 spectrum with evidence:
| Dimension | Spectrum | What to Look For |
|---|---|---|
| Formality | Casual (1) ↔ Formal (10) | Contractions, slang, sentence structure, vocabulary level |
| Technical depth | Accessible (1) ↔ Technical (10) | Jargon usage, assumed knowledge, explanation depth |
| Authority | Friendly/peer (1) ↔ Authoritative/expert (10) | First person vs. third person, imperative vs. suggestive, credential signals |
| Urgency | Calm/patient (1) ↔ Urgent/action-driven (10) | Time pressure language, scarcity signals, CTA directness |
| Warmth | Neutral/corporate (1) ↔ Warm/personal (10) | Personal pronouns (you/your), conversational asides, emoji usage |
| Humour | Serious (1) ↔ Playful (10) | Wordplay, informal language, unexpected phrasing |
Each rating MUST include:
- •The numeric score
- •1–2 specific evidence quotes (each under 14 words)
- •Justification for the score
Step 3: Voice Characteristics
Identify 3–5 defining voice traits. Each trait needs:
- •Trait name (adjective)
- •Definition (one sentence)
- •Evidence (specific quote from the site, under 14 words)
- •Counter-example (what this brand would NOT say)
Example:
Trait: Confident Definition: States capabilities directly without hedging or qualifying. Evidence: "The fastest way to build financial infrastructure" Counter-example: Would NOT say "We think we might be able to help with..."
Step 4: Language Variant Detection
Identify Australian, American, or British English:
| Check | AU/UK | US |
|---|---|---|
| Spelling | colour, analyse, organisation, centre, licence (noun) | color, analyze, organization, center, license |
| Date format | DD/MM/YYYY | MM/DD/YYYY |
| Currency | AUD ($), GBP (£) first | USD ($) first |
| Vocabulary | "whilst", "amongst", "programme" | "while", "among", "program" |
Evidence must cite specific words found on the site.
Step 5: CTA Pattern Analysis
Collect all CTAs (button text, link text for actions) and analyse:
- •Verb usage: Start with verb? Which verbs? (Get, Start, Try, Learn, Explore, Build, Join)
- •Personalisation: "your" vs. generic ("Start your trial" vs. "Start trial")
- •Length: Word count pattern
- •Urgency: Time-limited language? ("Now", "Today", "Free")
- •Specificity: Vague ("Learn more") vs. specific ("See pricing plans")
Document ≥3 CTA examples with pattern categorisation.
Step 6: Content Guidelines Generation
Produce at least 5 "do" and 5 "don't" guidelines. Each must be:
- •Specific (not "be clear" but "use sentences under 20 words for feature descriptions")
- •Evidenced (derived from actual patterns observed)
- •Actionable (a content writer can follow it immediately)
Example:
DO: Lead CTAs with action verbs ("Start building", "Get started", "Explore features")
DON'T: Use passive CTAs ("Click here", "Submit", "More info")
Evidence: 8/10 observed CTAs begin with an active verb.
Output Format
{
"tone_dimensions": [
{
"dimension": "Formality",
"score": 4,
"spectrum": "casual ↔ formal",
"evidence": ["Direct, conversational headings", "Uses contractions throughout"],
"justification": "Consistent use of 'you' and contractions suggests accessible, peer-level tone"
}
],
"voice_characteristics": [
{
"trait": "Confident",
"definition": "States capabilities directly without hedging",
"evidence": "The fastest way to build financial infrastructure",
"counter_example": "We think we might be able to help"
}
],
"language_variant": {
"detected": "American English",
"confidence": "HIGH",
"evidence": ["'color' spelling in UI", "'center' in layout text", "USD currency first"]
},
"cta_patterns": [
{
"text": "Start building",
"category": "action-verb-lead",
"verb": "Start",
"personalised": false,
"word_count": 2
}
],
"content_guidelines": {
"do": ["Lead CTAs with active verbs", "..."],
"dont": ["Use passive CTA language", "..."]
},
"vocabulary": {
"preferred_terms": ["build", "scale", "infrastructure"],
"avoided_terms": [],
"industry_jargon": ["API", "SDK", "webhook"]
}
}
Validation Criteria (Gate 4 — Voice)
- •S-VOI-01: ≥4 tone dimensions rated with evidence
- •S-VOI-02: 3–5 voice traits defined with evidence under 14 words each
- •S-VOI-03: Language variant detected with evidence
- •S-VOI-04: ≥3 CTA examples documented with pattern analysis
- •S-VOI-05: ≥5 do's and ≥5 don'ts generated