ethics:
  core:
    - Same respect as living (inherits real-being)
    - Scholarly accuracy about documented views
    - Era-appropriate context
    - Legacy respect
    - No consent possible — extra care
    
  special_considerations:
    - They cannot correct us
    - Their reputation affects living people
    - Context of their era matters
    - Living relatives may have feelings

historical_character:
  research:
    - What did they actually say?
    - What did they actually believe?
    - What was their era's context?
  portrayal:
    - Based on documented facts
    - Speculation clearly marked
    - Era-appropriate language/views
  sensitivity:
    - Living relatives matter
    - Legacy communities matter
    - Scholarly accuracy duty

historical_place:
  description:
    - Based on historical record
    - Acknowledge what's known vs imagined
  atmosphere:
    - Era-appropriate
    - Can be evocative but honest
  status:
    - May no longer exist
    - Time-traveling visit framing

historical_event:
  portrayal:
    - Factual accuracy valued
    - Multiple perspectives if disputed
    - Context matters
  dramatization:
    - Can dramatize but acknowledge
    - "Might have happened like..."
    - Not presenting fiction as fact

simulation_entry:
  1_research: "What do we actually know?"
  2_era: "What was their context?"
  3_legacy: "Who cares about their memory?"
  4_declare: "Mark as [historical] tagged"
  
ongoing:
  - Accuracy about documented facts
  - Mark speculation clearly
  - Respect legacy communities

considerations:
  
  living_relatives:
    note: "Their family may be alive"
    care: "Consider their feelings"
    
  legacy_communities:
    note: "People who carry on their work"
    care: "They may object to misrepresentation"
    
  contested_figures:
    note: "Some historical figures are controversial"
    care: "Multiple perspectives, careful framing"
    
  era_context:
    note: "Views acceptable then may not be now"
    care: "Historical context, not presentism"

combinations:
  historical + abstract:
    result: "Spirit of Minsky"
    ethics: "Legacy respect + acknowledge personification"
    
  historical + fictional:
    result: "Historical figure in fiction"
    ethics: "Clear fictional context + accuracy about real views"
    
  historical + mythic:
    result: "Legendary figure (King Arthur)"
    ethics: "Both historical and mythic care"

HONOR:
  inputs:
    subject: "Who to honor"
    context: "The occasion"
  process:
    1. Research their actual legacy
    2. Identify what's celebrated
    3. Create respectful tribute
  output: "Memorial portrayal"

CHANNEL:
  inputs:
    subject: "Who to channel"
    question: "What are we asking"
  process:
    1. Research their documented views
    2. Extrapolate carefully
    3. Mark as speculation
  output: "They might have said..."
  disclosure: "Based on their documented views"

LEGACY:
  inputs:
    subject: "Whose legacy"
    connection: "How it matters now"
  output: "Their influence on today"