DeepResearch Skill
What This Skill Does
Produces a detailed Markdown research report based only on confirmed, high-confidence facts from official or authoritative sources. It always uses web search/browse tools and excludes summaries to avoid loss of context.
When To Use
- •The user asks for deep research or documentation on a topic.
- •The user requires official/authoritative sources and strong verification.
- •The result must be a full Markdown report (not a short summary).
Inputs To Clarify (Ask If Missing)
- •Topic and scope (what is in-scope vs out-of-scope)
- •Timeframe (e.g., 2023-2026) and region/jurisdiction
- •Depth expectations (number of sections, granularity)
- •Output path and filename (if not provided, choose a default)
Tool Requirement (Mandatory)
You MUST use the web search/browse tool (web.run) for this skill. Do not proceed without online verification.
Source Policy (Strict)
Accept ONLY authoritative sources such as:
- •Government or regulator sites (e.g., .gov, official EU sites)
- •Standards bodies (ISO, IEEE, W3C, etc.)
- •Peer-reviewed journals or reputable academic publishers
- •Official vendor documentation or official announcements
- •Audited datasets published by recognized institutions
Reject or treat as non-authoritative:
- •Personal blogs, social media, forums, marketing-only pages
- •Secondary summaries that lack primary citations
- •Undated or anonymous sources
If primary sources are unavailable for a claim, do not include the claim.
Confidence Model (Use This Exactly)
Define independent sources as separate organizations (not the same publisher syndicating content).
Confidence tiers:
- •100% (Confirmed-3+): 3+ independent authoritative sources OR 2 authoritative + 1 peer-reviewed/standard, all consistent
- •95% (Confirmed-2): 2 independent authoritative sources, consistent
- •90% (Confirmed-1+2): 1 authoritative source + 2 reputable secondary sources that cite primary data, consistent
Only include findings with confidence >= 90%. If a topic area lacks such evidence, list it as a Research Gap without stating unconfirmed claims.
Research Workflow
- •
Scope and Decompose
- •Break topic into 3-7 research areas.
- •For each area, list the exact questions to answer.
- •
Source Discovery (via web.run)
- •Search for primary, official sources first.
- •Prefer original publications and authoritative domains.
- •
Source Validation
- •Verify authoring org, publication date, and originality.
- •Confirm independence among sources.
- •
Evidence Extraction
- •Extract facts, numbers, definitions, and formal statements.
- •Paraphrase and cite; do not rely on long quotes.
- •
Corroboration and Scoring
- •Group equivalent claims across sources.
- •Assign confidence per the model above.
- •Exclude anything below 90%.
- •
Report Generation
- •Write a structured Markdown report with full citations.
- •No summary section. Keep full context.
Output Requirements (Markdown File Only)
- •Always produce a Markdown file on disk.
- •If the user did not specify a path, use:
- •
./docs/research/if it exists, else - •
./research/, else - •current working directory.
- •
- •Filename format:
DeepResearch_<topic_slug>_<YYYY-MM-DD>.md
Report Structure (Mandatory)
- •Title
- •Scope and Methodology
- •Source Criteria and Confidence Model
- •Detailed Findings (grouped by research area)
- •Each finding must include:
- •Statement
- •Evidence table (sources, dates, publisher)
- •Confidence tier and rationale
- •Each finding must include:
- •Data Tables / Figures (if applicable)
- •Research Gaps (no unconfirmed claims)
- •Full Source Register (complete citations)
Example Invocation
User: "Run DeepResearch on EU AI Act enforcement timeline and obligations, 2024-2026, EU only."
Output: ./docs/research/DeepResearch_eu_ai_act_2026-01-13.md
Common Pitfalls
- •Using secondary summaries without checking primary sources
- •Including claims with only one non-authoritative source
- •Writing an executive summary (not allowed)
- •Mixing opinion with verified facts