Operator Document Triage

Methodical workflow for reviewing Operator documents and deciding their next steps in the development pipeline.

When to Use

Activate when:

•User mentions "triage" with Operator documents
•User wants to review items in Operator folders (bugs, fragments, on-deck, etc.)
•User asks to process or route Operator documents
•User has multiple documents to assess and route

Prerequisites

•Operator MCP access configured (see operator-setup skill)
•Valid session with Operator Editor

Triage Workflow

1. Authenticate with Operator

Use the cached session from .operator file, or re-authenticate if expired.

2. Locate Documents to Triage

Either:

•User provides specific document name(s)
•Browse a folder (e.g., "bugs", "fragments", "on-deck")
•Search for documents matching criteria

3. For Each Document: Assess → Decide → Record

A. Read and Assess

Read the document and determine:

Aspect	Questions
Type	Bug report? Feature idea? Architecture thought? UX flow?
Maturity	Raw capture? Explored concept? Clear specification?
Clarity	Ready to act on? Needs investigation first?

B. Decide Routing

Reference the docs framework: See docs/README.md for the complete decision flowchart and document type definitions.

Operator → Docs Routing (from docs/README.md):

Operator Content	Routes To
Feature ideas	→ Investigation or Proposal
Bug reports	→ Lesson Learned (if solved) or Investigation (if unclear)
Architecture thoughts	→ Architecture documentation
UX flow thoughts	→ Interaction Design documentation
Work context	→ Referenced in Sessions

Decision Framework (simplified):

code

Is it a clear, solved problem?
  → Lesson Learned (document the fix)

Is it uncertain or needs research?
  → Investigation (explore before committing)

Is it a clear feature idea with known approach?
  → Proposal (define what and why)

Is it an approved proposal?
  → Plan (define how to build it)

Is it ready to implement?
  → Development (create worktree, start work)

Not ready to act on?
  → Fragment (capture for later)

Quick Actions:

Route	Next Action
Investigation	Move to on-deck, launch `investigator` agent
Proposal	Create proposal doc using `proposal-writer` agent
Plan	Create dev plan using `dev-plan-generator` agent
Development	Create worktree using `parallel-worktree-dev` skill
Lesson Learned	Create doc in `docs/lessons-learned/`
Fragment	Move to fragments folder, revisit later
Defer	Move to backlog, note reason

C. Record Decision as Task

Create a task capturing:

•Subject: Triage: <document-name> → <routing-decision>
•
Description:
- •Source location in Operator
- •Summary of content (2-3 sentences)
- •Routing decision and rationale
- •Specific next steps to execute

Example:

code

Subject: Triage: missing-feature.md → Investigation

Description:
**Source:** Operator/bugs/missing-feature.md

**Summary:**
- Reports that X doesn't work when Y
- Unclear if bug or missing feature
- Needs codebase exploration

**Decision:** Investigation

**Next Steps:**
1. Move to on-deck folder
2. Launch investigator agent
3. Create proposal based on findings

4. After Triaging All Documents

•Run TaskList to show all pending triage decisions
•Ask user if ready to execute decisions
•
Execute in order:
- •Move documents to appropriate Operator folders
- •Launch agents as needed (investigator, proposal-writer, etc.)
- •Create docs or worktrees as appropriate
•Mark tasks completed as each is executed

Folder Conventions in Operator

Folder	Purpose
`fragments`	Raw ideas, quick captures, incomplete thoughts
`bugs`	Bug reports, issues to investigate
`on-deck`	Ready for next action (investigation, proposal, etc.)
`proposals`	Feature proposals awaiting approval
`archive`	Completed or declined items

Tips

•Batch similar items: If multiple docs route the same way, note patterns
•Flag dependencies: If doc A depends on doc B, note in task description
•Preserve context: Include enough detail in task to execute later without re-reading
•Ask when unclear: If routing isn't obvious, ask user for guidance
•Reference the framework: When uncertain, consult docs/README.md decision flowchart