discover_workers() {
  if [[ -d .postman/inbox ]]; then
    ls -1 .postman/inbox 2>/dev/null | grep "^worker"
  fi
}

# Usage
WORKERS=$(discover_workers)
# Output:
# worker-claude
# worker-codex

find_agent_pane() {
  local agent="$1"
  tmux list-panes -s -F "#{pane_pid} #{pane_id}" | while read pid id; do
    ps -ax -o ppid,command | grep -v grep | grep -F "$agent" \
      | grep -q "^\s*$pid" && echo "$id"
  done
}

# Usage
CLAUDE=$(find_agent_pane claude)
CODEX=$(find_agent_pane codex)

[SUBAGENT capability=READONLY]
{task content}

FILE=$(${CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR}/scripts/touchfile.sh .i9wa4/reviews --type "${ROLE}-cx") && \
codex exec --sandbox workspace-write -C .i9wa4 \
  -o "$FILE" \
  "[SUBAGENT capability=READONLY] {task content}" &
wait

START -> PLAN -> CODE -> PR -> COMPLETE

2025-01-01 10:00:00 | START -> PLAN
2025-01-01 11:00:00 | PLAN -> CODE

CURRENT: <what was done> | <mood> <emoji>
NEXT: <what is needed to continue>

# Roadmap: <Feature Name>

## Phase: PLAN

- [x] Read requirements
- [x] Investigate existing code
- [x] Consult Workers
- [x] Create plan document
- [x] Parallel review
- [x] User approval

## Phase: CODE

- [x] Implement changes
- [x] Add tests
- [x] Consult Workers
- [ ] Parallel review
- [ ] User approval

## Phase: PR

- [ ] Consult Workers
- [ ] Create draft PR

## Blocked

- [ ] <blocked item> (reason)

${CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR}/scripts/touchfile.sh .i9wa4/plans --type plan

# Plan: {title}

## Source

- Type: <source_type>
- Reference: <source_reference>

## Context

<additional context from user>

## Investigation Summary

<findings from investigation phase>

## Implementation Plan

### Step 1: <step title>

- Files: <affected files>
- Changes: <what to change>

## Risks and Considerations

- <risk 1>

## Test Strategy

- <how to verify>

${CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR}/scripts/touchfile.sh .i9wa4/reviews --type completion

# Implementation Complete

## Plan Reference

- File: .i9wa4/plans/plan-file.md

## Changes Made

| File   | Change Type | Description |
| ------ | ----------- | ----------- |
| <file> | <type>      | <desc>      |

## Test Results

- <test outcome>

## PR / Commit

- <PR number or commit hash>

[SUBAGENT capability=READONLY]
<!-- REVIEW_SESSION
timestamp: {TS}, source: {SOURCE}, role: {ROLE}
review_type: {REVIEW_TYPE}, target_type: {TARGET_TYPE}, target: {TARGET}
-->
Return your review directly. Do NOT create files.

Task tool calls (parallel):
- subagent_type: reviewer-security
- subagent_type: reviewer-architecture
- subagent_type: reviewer-historian
- subagent_type: reviewer-code
- subagent_type: reviewer-qa

for ROLE in security architecture historian code qa; do
  FILE=$(${CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR}/scripts/touchfile.sh .i9wa4/reviews --type "${ROLE}-cx")
  codex exec --sandbox workspace-write -C .i9wa4 -o "$FILE" "{task}"
done

gh pr diff $PR_NUMBER > .i9wa4/tmp/pr-diff.txt

Task tool calls (parallel, single message):
- subagent_type: reviewer-security
- subagent_type: reviewer-architecture
- subagent_type: reviewer-historian
- subagent_type: reviewer-code (or reviewer-data for design review)
- subagent_type: reviewer-qa

[SUBAGENT capability=READONLY]
Review PR #N from {ROLE} perspective.
See .i9wa4/tmp/pr-diff.txt for the diff.

for ROLE in security architecture historian data qa; do
  FILE=$("${CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR}/scripts/touchfile.sh" .i9wa4/reviews --type "review-${ROLE}-cx")
  codex exec --sandbox workspace-write -o "$FILE" \
    "[SUBAGENT capability=READONLY] Review PR #N from ${ROLE} perspective. See .i9wa4/tmp/pr-diff.txt for the diff." &
done
wait

# Check all review files
ls -la .i9wa4/reviews/*-review-*.md

# Read and summarize
cat .i9wa4/reviews/*-review-*.md

[SUBAGENT capability=READONLY]
<!-- DELIBERATION_SESSION
timestamp: {TS}, role: {ROLE}
review_type: {REVIEW_TYPE}, target_type: {TARGET_TYPE}, target: {TARGET}
-->

## Phase 1 Review Results Summary

{List all Phase 1 findings sorted by severity}

## Questions

Based on other reviewers' findings, from your expert perspective ({ROLE}):

1. Are there any additional points to raise?
2. Are there any supplementary points related to other findings?
3. Are there any overlooked perspectives?

Output in the same format as Phase 1 only if there are additional findings.
If no additional findings, explicitly state "No additional findings."

Task tool calls (parallel, single message):
- subagent_type: reviewer-security (with Phase 1 results)
- subagent_type: reviewer-architecture (with Phase 1 results)
- subagent_type: reviewer-historian (with Phase 1 results)
- subagent_type: reviewer-code or reviewer-data (with Phase 1 results)
- subagent_type: reviewer-qa (with Phase 1 results)

${CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR}/scripts/touchfile.sh .i9wa4/reviews/summary.md

# Review Summary

## Target

- Type: {review_type} / {target_type}, Target: {target}

## Findings by Phase

### Phase 1: Initial Review

| # | Issue               | Reporter     | Severity | File               |
| - | ------------------- | ------------ | -------- | ------------------ |
| 1 | {issue description} | {role}-{src} | High     | `path/to/file:123` |

### Phase 2: Deliberation

| # | Issue                | Reporter     | Triggered By | Severity | File               |
| - | -------------------- | ------------ | ------------ | -------- | ------------------ |
| 1 | {additional finding} | {role}-{src} | {role}       | Medium   | `path/to/file:456` |

## Coverage Analysis

| Perspective  | Phase 1 | Phase 2 | Total |
| ------------ | ------- | ------- | ----- |
| Security     | N       | M       | N+M   |
| Architecture | N       | M       | N+M   |
| Historian    | N       | M       | N+M   |
| Code/Data    | N       | M       | N+M   |
| QA           | N       | M       | N+M   |
| **Total**    | **X**   | **Y**   | **Z** |

[WORKER capability=WRITABLE to=%N]

Create draft PR with:
- Title: <title>
- Body: <body>
- Base: main

Use: gh pr create --draft --title "..." --body "..."