When presenting alternatives, options, or approaches, use this format.
Rules
- •Architecturally distinct solutions — each option takes a fundamentally different approach, not cosmetic variations of the same idea
- •No obviously bad options — every option must be genuinely viable. Don't pad the list.
- •No rejected options — if the user already rejected an approach in this conversation, don't resurface it
- •No hedging — state confidence as a percentage, not "might work" or "should be fine"
- •No sub-part variants — once the user picks an option, apply their refinement to it directly. Never generate variants of a sub-part of a picked option
Format per option
Option N: [Name] (X% confident)
- •What: 1-2 sentences
- •Pros: bullets
- •Cons: bullets