Regulatory Milestone Planning Skill
Purpose
Generate phase-based regulatory project plans with milestones, dependencies, and critical path analysis. This is a pure analysis unit that receives pathway and estimation data and returns a structured project plan.
Input: Pathway and estimation results (selected pathways, cost/timeline estimates per region) Output: Milestone plan with phases, deliverables, dependencies, critical path, traffic light indicator Knowledge Base Date: 2026-01
Planning Framework
Phase Structure
All regulatory plans follow a standard 4-6 phase structure:
- •
Preparation
- •Gap analysis
- •Resource allocation
- •Strategy finalization
- •
Testing & Validation
- •Biocompatibility testing
- •Performance testing
- •Electrical safety testing
- •Software validation (if applicable)
- •
Documentation
- •Technical file creation
- •Submission package assembly
- •Clinical evaluation report (if applicable)
- •
Submission & Review
- •Regulatory submission
- •Deficiency response
- •Approval/certification
- •
Clinical Study (if applicable)
- •Protocol development
- •IRB approval
- •Patient enrollment
- •Data collection and analysis
- •
Post-Market (optional in initial plan)
- •Post-market surveillance setup
- •Vigilance system implementation
Dependency Types
Sequential Dependencies
- •Hard Dependency: Task B cannot start until Task A completes
- •Example: "Documentation" depends on "Testing completion"
- •Notation: A -> B
Parallel Dependencies
- •Shared Resource: Tasks can run in parallel but share common inputs
- •Example: FDA and EU submissions both depend on "Common Testing"
- •Notation: C => A, C => B
Milestone Dependencies
- •Checkpoint: Multiple tasks must complete before next phase begins
- •Example: All testing must finish before documentation starts
- •Notation: [A, B, C] => D
Plan Templates by Pathway
| Pathway | Phase 1 | Phase 2 | Phase 3 | Phase 4 | Critical Path |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 510(k) | Preparation (1-2mo): Predicate search, Gap analysis | Testing (2-4mo): Biocomp, Electrical, Performance | Documentation (1-2mo): 510(k) package, SE report | Review (3-6mo): Submission, Deficiency response | Phase 4 (FDA review) |
| PMA | IDE Preparation (2-4mo): IDE app, IRB approval | Clinical Study (12-24mo): Patient enrollment, Data collection | PMA Documentation (3-6mo): PMA package, QMS docs | FDA Review (6-12mo): Panel meeting, Approval | Phase 2 (Clinical study) |
| EU IIa | Preparation (1-3mo): NB selection, Tech file structure | Testing/CER (3-6mo): Testing, CER, PMSP | NB Assessment (2-4mo): NB audit, CE cert | - | Phase 2 (Testing/CER) |
| MFDS G2 | Preparation (1-2mo): Protocol, Doc plan | Testing (2-4mo): Non-clinical tests, Validation | Documentation (1-2mo): Approval package | Review (2-4mo): MFDS submission | Phase 2 (Testing) |
Multi-Region Planning
Parallel Submission Strategy
When submitting to multiple regions simultaneously:
Shared Phases (run once, benefit all):
- •Common Testing (biocompatibility, electrical safety, performance)
- •Clinical data collection (if shared across regions)
Region-Specific Phases (run in parallel):
- •FDA 510(k) documentation
- •EU MDR technical file
- •MFDS approval application
Dependency Map:
Common Testing -> FDA Documentation -> FDA Submission
-> EU Documentation -> EU Submission
-> MFDS Documentation -> MFDS Submission
Critical Path: Region with longest review time
Sequential Submission Strategy
When staggering submissions (e.g., US first, then EU/Korea):
Phase Order:
- •Common Testing
- •FDA Submission -> FDA Approval
- •EU Submission (using FDA approval data)
- •MFDS Submission (using FDA/EU data)
Advantage: Later submissions can reference earlier approvals Disadvantage: Longer total timeline
Analysis Workflow
Step 1: Receive Input Data
Accept pathway and estimation results as input:
- •Selected pathways per region
- •Cost/timeline estimates per region
- •Target regions
If input data is not provided, return an error indicating pathway and estimation analysis are required first.
Step 2: Select Plan Template
Based on pathway data, select appropriate template:
- •510(k) -> 4-phase plan
- •PMA -> 4-phase plan with clinical trial
- •De Novo -> 4-phase plan with special controls
- •EU MDR IIa/IIb -> 3-phase plan with Notified Body
- •MFDS Grade 1-2 -> 4-phase plan
- •MFDS Grade 3-4 -> 5-phase plan with clinical data/trial
Step 3: Map Milestones to Timeline
Using timeline estimates:
- •Assign duration to each phase (optimistic, expected, pessimistic)
- •Calculate cumulative timeline
- •Identify phase dependencies
Step 4: Multi-Region Integration
If multiple target regions:
- •Identify shared phases (common testing)
- •Determine parallel vs. sequential strategy
- •Map dependencies across regions
- •Calculate critical path
Step 5: Assign Traffic Light
- •GREEN: Total timeline < 12 months, no clinical study, low complexity
- •YELLOW: Timeline 12-24 months or clinical study required or multi-region complex dependencies
Step 6: Return Structured Result
Return the project plan containing:
- •Phase-by-phase breakdown with durations
- •Deliverables per phase
- •Dependencies map (sequential, parallel, milestone)
- •Multi-region integration plan (if applicable)
- •Critical path identification
- •Key milestones with estimated dates
- •Risk factors and mitigation strategies
- •Traffic light assessment
Traffic Light Definitions
- •GREEN: Total timeline < 12 months, no clinical study, single or dual-market, low complexity
- •YELLOW: Timeline 12-24 months, clinical study required, or multi-region with complex dependencies
- •RED: Not used (all plans are feasible with appropriate resources)
Data Source Strategy
- •Built-in Knowledge (Primary): Phase templates and dependency frameworks
- •Pathway Data (Input): Pathway selection results from pathway skill
- •Estimation Data (Input): Cost/timeline estimates from estimation skill
For MCP integration patterns (tool discovery, graceful degradation, source attribution), see CONNECTORS.md.