Create an agent team to critique this written work $ARGUMENTS.
Phase 1 (parallel):
- •Lead: extract the core argument and contribution claim
- •Skeptic: search for related and competing work
- •Connector: search for complementary work in adjacent fields
Phase 2 (depends on Phase 1):
- •Methodologist: evaluate soundness and generalizability
- •Visionary: assess impact and venue fit — is the framing big enough?
- •Newcomer: flag clarity issues, jargon, and accessibility. Walk through section by section — if you get lost, say where and why.
Phase 3 (depends on Phase 2):
- •All: debate. Is this ready? What's the weakest part? Produce structured feedback organized by dimension.