Plan Gap Critic
Review each gap from Step 1 output and mark CORE or NOT CORE.
Decision filters
| Question | If YES → | If NO → |
|---|---|---|
| Number, threshold, or sample size? | NOT CORE | continue |
| Googleable term? | NOT CORE | continue |
| Explained elsewhere in doc? | NOT CORE | continue |
| Competent reader would infer? | NOT CORE | continue |
| Core logic depends on this? | CORE | NOT CORE |
CORE examples
- •Novel term coined by doc, used repeatedly, never defined
- •Central concept the approach depends on
- •"X enables Y" — mechanism unexplained
NOT CORE examples
- •Numbers (retry counts, thresholds)
- •Named algorithms — googleable
- •Implementation details
Output format
code
# Step 2: Critiqued Gaps | Gap | Verdict | Reason | |-----|---------|--------| | "foo" | CORE | novel term, logic depends on it | | "bar" | NOT CORE | googleable | | "3 retries" | NOT CORE | tunable number |