AgentSkillsCN

research-brief

为每种模型生成优化后的提示词,打造多LLM研究设计。主动启用以下场景:(1) 研究规划;(2) 竞争分析;(3) 市场研究;(4) 技术评估;(5) 战略研究。触发指令包括:“研究简报”“研究设计”“研究计划”“竞争分析”“市场研究”“多模型研究”。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: research-brief
description: >
  Generate multi-LLM research design with optimized prompts for each model.
  PROACTIVELY activate for: (1) research planning, (2) competitive analysis,
  (3) market research, (4) technology evaluation, (5) strategic research.
  Triggers: "research brief", "research design", "research plan", "competitive analysis",
  "market research", "multi-model research"
argument-hint: [research question]

Research Brief

Generate a comprehensive research design with model-optimized prompts for multi-LLM research.

When to Use

Use this skill when you need to:

  • Design a research strategy that leverages multiple AI models
  • Decompose complex research questions into MECE sub-questions
  • Generate prompts optimized for Claude, Gemini, and GPT strengths
  • Plan systematic research with risk assessment

Workflow

Invoke the create-research-brief skill Phase 1 for: "$ARGUMENTS"

Default Parameters

ParameterValueRationale
research_typemarketDefault; override based on question
risk_depthstandardBalanced risk assessment
model_modeparallelRun models simultaneously
multi_hypothesisfalseEnable for hypothesis-driven research
expert_panelfalseEnable for strategic decisions

Research Types

Select based on the research question:

  • market - Market sizing, trends, demand analysis
  • competitive - Competitor analysis, positioning, strategy
  • technology - Tech evaluation, build vs buy, capabilities
  • strategic - Strategic planning, scenario analysis, options

Model Assignment Strategy

ModelStrengthBest For
Claude Opus 4.5Judgment, synthesis, nuanceStrategic questions, conflict resolution
Gemini Pro 3Breadth, citations, groundingFactual lookup, comprehensive sourcing
GPT-5.2 DeepRecency, depth, exhaustivenessTechnical details, edge cases

MECE Decomposition

The skill will decompose your research question into 5 categories following the appropriate MECE pattern:

Market Research:

  1. Market Size & Growth
  2. Market Structure & Segmentation
  3. Demand Drivers & Customer Needs
  4. Supply & Competition
  5. Evolution & Trends

Competitive Intelligence:

  1. Product & Capabilities
  2. Customers & Positioning
  3. Go-to-Market Strategy
  4. Organization & Resources
  5. Strategy & Trajectory

Technology Evaluation:

  1. Capability & Performance
  2. Maturity & Ecosystem
  3. Fit & Integration
  4. Cost & Economics
  5. Risk & Governance

Strategic Research:

  1. Current State Assessment
  2. External Environment
  3. Strategic Options
  4. Stakeholder Considerations
  5. Implementation Requirements

Output Format

The research brief will include:

xml
<research-brief>
  <header>
    <id>[unique identifier]</id>
    <type>[market|competitive|technology|strategic]</type>
    <objective>[research question]</objective>
  </header>

  <mece-decomposition>
    <category name="[Category 1]">
      <question>[Sub-question 1.1]</question>
      <question>[Sub-question 1.2]</question>
    </category>
    <!-- ... more categories ... -->
  </mece-decomposition>

  <model-prompts>
    <prompt model="claude" category="[assigned categories]">
      [Optimized prompt for Claude]
    </prompt>
    <prompt model="gemini" category="[assigned categories]">
      [Optimized prompt for Gemini]
    </prompt>
    <prompt model="gpt" category="[assigned categories]">
      [Optimized prompt for GPT]
    </prompt>
  </model-prompts>

  <risk-assessment depth="[quick|standard|comprehensive]">
    [Risk factors and mitigations]
  </risk-assessment>

  <next-steps>
    1. Execute prompts in each model
    2. Collect responses
    3. Run /consolidate-research with outputs
  </next-steps>
</research-brief>

Quality Gates

  • Research objective is clear and answerable
  • MECE decomposition has no overlaps or gaps
  • Each sub-question is independently researchable
  • Model assignments match model strengths
  • Prompts are optimized for each model's style
  • Risk assessment appropriate to decision stakes