Git Commit
Creates git commits following Conventional Commits format with proper type, scope, and subject.
Quick Start
# 1. Check for project-specific commit conventions cat .claude/CLAUDE.md 2>/dev/null | grep -A 20 -i "commit" # 2. Stage changes git add <files> # or: git add -A # 3. Create commit (branch commit format) git commit -m "type(scope): subject Body explaining HOW and WHY. Reference: Task X.Y, Req N"
Commit Types
Regular Branch Commits (During Development)
Format: type(scope): subject
| Type | Purpose |
|---|---|
feat | New feature or functionality |
fix | Bug fix or issue resolution |
refactor | Code refactoring without behavior change |
perf | Performance improvements |
test | Test additions or modifications |
ci | CI/CD configuration changes |
docs | Documentation updates |
chore | Maintenance, dependencies, tooling |
style | Code formatting, linting (non-functional) |
security | Security vulnerability fixes or hardening |
Scope (Required, kebab-case)
Examples: validation, auth, cookie-service, template, config, tests, api
Subject Line Rules
- •Max 50 characters after colon
- •Present tense imperative: add, implement, fix, improve, enhance, refactor, remove, prevent
- •NO period at the end
- •Specific and descriptive - state WHAT, not WHY
Core Workflow
1. Check Project Conventions
ALWAYS check first - project may override defaults:
cat .claude/CLAUDE.md 2>/dev/null | grep -A 30 -i "commit" cat .kiro/steering/*.md 2>/dev/null | grep -A 20 -i "commit"
If project specifies different format, USE PROJECT FORMAT.
2. Review Changes
git status git diff --staged # if already staged git diff # if not staged
3. Stage Files
git add <specific-files> # preferred # or git add -A # all changes
NEVER commit:
- •
.env,credentials.json, secrets - •
node_modules/,__pycache__/,.venv/ - •Large binary files without explicit approval
4. Create Commit
Simple change:
git commit -m "fix(auth): use hmac.compare_digest for secure comparison"
Complex change (with body):
git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF' feat(validation): add URLValidator with domain whitelist Implement URLValidator class supporting: - Domain whitelist enforcement (youtube.com, youtu.be) - Dangerous scheme blocking (javascript, data, file) - URL parsing with embedded credentials handling Addresses Requirement 31: Input validation Part of Task 5.1: Input Validation Utilities EOF )"
5. Verify Commit
git log -1 --format="%h %s" git show --stat HEAD
Body Format (Recommended for Complex Changes)
<blank line> Explain HOW and WHY the change was made. - Use bullet points for multiple items - Wrap at 72 characters Reference: Task X.Y Addresses: Req N
Git Trailers
| Trailer | Purpose |
|---|---|
Fixes #N | Links and closes issue on merge |
Closes #N | Same as Fixes |
Co-authored-by: Name <email> | Credit co-contributors |
Place trailers at end of body after blank line. See references/commit_examples.md for examples.
Breaking Changes
For incompatible API/behavior changes, use ! after scope OR BREAKING CHANGE: footer:
feat(api)!: change response format to JSON:API
BREAKING CHANGE: Response envelope changed from `{ data }` to `{ data: { type, id, attributes } }`.
Triggers major version bump in semantic-release.
Merge Commits (PR Closure)
For PRs, use extended description with sections:
gh pr create --title "feat(security): implement input validation (Task 5)" --body "$(cat <<'EOF' ## Summary - Input validation utilities (URLValidator, FormatValidator) - Secure template processor with path traversal prevention - API key authentication middleware ## Task Breakdown Task 5.1: Input Validation - URLValidator, FormatValidator Task 5.2: Template Processing - Path traversal prevention Task 5.3: API Key Auth - Multi-key support, excluded paths Task 5.4: Security Tests - 102 path traversal tests ## Requirements Covered Req 7, Req 9, Req 31, Req 33 ## Test Coverage - All 473 tests passing - Coverage: 93% - Pre-commit checks: passing EOF )"
Integration with Other Skills
From github-pr-review
When fixing review comments, use this format:
git commit -m "fix(scope): address review comment #ID Brief explanation of what was wrong and how it's fixed. Addresses review comment #123456789."
From github-pr-creation
Before creating PR, ensure all commits follow this format. The PR skill will:
- •Analyze commits for proper format
- •Extract types for PR labels
- •Build PR description from commit bodies
Important Rules
- •ALWAYS check project conventions (CLAUDE.md) before committing
- •ALWAYS use project format if it differs from default
- •ALWAYS include scope in parentheses
- •ALWAYS use present tense imperative verb
- •NEVER end subject with period
- •NEVER commit secrets or credentials
- •NEVER use generic messages ("update code", "fix bug", "changes")
- •NEVER exceed 50 chars in subject line
- •Group related changes -> single focused commit
Examples
Good:
feat(validation): add URLValidator with domain whitelist fix(auth): use hmac.compare_digest for secure key comparison refactor(template): consolidate filename sanitization logic test(security): add 102 path traversal prevention tests
Bad:
update validation code # no type, no scope, vague feat: add stuff # missing scope, too vague fix(auth): fix bug # circular, not specific chore: make changes # missing scope, vague feat(security): improve things. # has period, vague
References
- •
references/commit_examples.md- Extended examples by type