CV Content Editor

<purpose> Edit existing portfolio content by cross-referencing the knowledge base to ensure consistency and accuracy. Maintains the source of truth in `content/knowledge/` while updating presentation-layer files. </purpose>

<when_to_activate> Activate when the user:

•Wants to update an existing case study
•Needs to modify experience highlights
•Wants to refine a variant's messaging
•Asks to improve or expand existing content
•Needs to sync content with knowledge base updates

Trigger phrases: "update", "edit", "modify", "change", "improve", "fix [content]" </when_to_activate>

Two-Way Sync Philosophy

code

Knowledge Base (Source of Truth)     Presentation Layer (Output)
─────────────────────────────────    ──────────────────────────
content/knowledge/                   content/case-studies/
├── achievements/                    content/experience/
├── stories/                         content/variants/
└── metrics/                         content/blog/
         ↓ generates                         ↑ informs
         ↓                                   ↑
    [EDITING FLOW: Update knowledge → Regenerate presentation]

Content Editing Workflow

Step 1: Identify What to Edit

•Read the target file user wants to modify
•Identify which knowledge base entities it draws from
•Query content/knowledge/index.yaml for relationships

Step 2: Determine Edit Scope

Edit Type	Scope	Files to Update
Factual correction	Knowledge base	Achievement/story → regenerate presentation
Messaging refinement	Presentation only	Case study/variant directly
New achievement	Knowledge base first	New achievement → update case study
Metric update	Knowledge base	Achievement metric → sync to presentation

Step 3: Execute Edit

For Knowledge Base Updates

•Edit the source file in content/knowledge/achievements/ or stories/
•Update content/knowledge/index.yaml if relationships changed
•Regenerate affected presentation files

For Presentation-Only Updates

•Read current file
•Apply targeted edits (preserve structure)
•Validate against schema

Step 4: Validate Consistency

•Knowledge base and presentation should not contradict
•Metrics should match across files
•Tags/themes should align with index

Edit Patterns

Pattern 1: Update Achievement Metric

User: "Update the Ankr revenue to $2.5M ARR"

Workflow:

code

1. Edit: content/knowledge/achievements/ankr-15x-revenue.yaml
   - Update metric.value and result section

2. Sync: content/case-studies/04-ankr-rpc.md
   - Update hook.impactMetric
   - Update Results section

3. Sync: content/experience/index.yaml
   - Update Ankr highlights if affected

Pattern 2: Improve Case Study Narrative

User: "Make the ETH staking case study more compelling"

Workflow:

code

1. Read: content/knowledge/stories/galaxy-compliance-win.yaml
   - Understand the core narrative

2. Read: content/case-studies/01-eth-staking.md
   - Identify weak sections

3. Edit: Case study directly
   - Strengthen hook
   - Add concrete details from story
   - Improve key quote

4. Consider: Backport improvements to story if substantial

Pattern 3: Update Variant for New Role

User: "Update the Bloomberg variant with new achievements"

Workflow:

code

1. Read: content/knowledge/achievements/*.yaml
   - Find new relevant achievements

2. Read: content/variants/bloomberg-technical-product-manager.yaml
   - Understand current positioning

3. Edit: Variant YAML
   - Add new achievements to relevant sections
   - Update relevance scores
   - Regenerate JSON

4. Validate: Test variant URL still works

Pattern 4: Add New Experience Highlight

User: "Add a highlight about shipping 3 protocols in parallel"

Workflow:

code

1. Check: Does achievement exist?
   - If not, create in content/knowledge/achievements/

2. Edit: content/experience/index.yaml
   - Add highlight to appropriate company

3. Consider: Update related case study if relevant

Content Validation

After any edit, verify:

Schema Validation

bash

npm run validate

Cross-Reference Check

• Achievement metrics match case study metrics
• Experience highlights reflect achievements
• Variant relevance scores are justified
• Index relationships are current

Consistency Check

• Same achievement = same numbers everywhere
• Company names consistent
• Dates/periods consistent
• Tags match knowledge base themes

Common Edit Commands

User Says	Action
"Update the numbers"	Edit achievement → sync presentation
"Make it more compelling"	Edit presentation narrative
"Add this achievement"	Create achievement → update presentation
"Fix inconsistency"	Identify source of truth → sync all
"Improve this section"	Targeted presentation edit

Output Format

When editing, always:

•Show the diff (what changed)
•List all files updated
•Note if knowledge base was modified
•Suggest running validation

Example output:

code

Updated files:
- content/knowledge/achievements/ankr-15x-revenue.yaml (metric update)
- content/case-studies/04-ankr-rpc.md (synced metric)

Knowledge base updated: Yes
Run validation: npm run validate