blog-voice-review

审查博客内容，确保其具有真实的声音和语气。检查内容是否听起来像Fabio的对话式、诚实的技术写作风格。触发短语：“声音”、“声音审查”、“语气”、“听起来像我”、“真实”、“检查声音”、“声音检查”

SKILL.md

--- frontmatter

name: blog-voice-review
description: |
  Review blog content for authentic voice and tone. Checks if content sounds like Fabio's conversational, honest technical writing style.
  Trigger phrases: "voice", "voice review", "tone", "sounds like me", "authentic", "check voice", "voice check"
allowed-tools: Read

Voice & Tone Review

Quick Checks

•First person? ("I've been", "my experience")
•Conversational? (like talking to a colleague)
•Honest about limitations?
•Personal experience vs generic advice?
•Any English idioms that confuse non-native speakers?

Red Flags

•Overly formal language
•Generic examples ("Let's say you have...")
•Claims without personal context
•Marketing speak
•Phrases like "leverage", "utilize" instead of "use"

Title & Clickbait Check

Watch for clickbait patterns in titles:

•Excessive superlatives ("worst", "best", "ultimate")
•Manufactured urgency or drama
•Promising more than the content delivers
•"You won't believe..." or similar hooks

Good titles:

•Honest about scope ("one of my bad habits" not "my worst habit")
•Clear about what the post covers
•Personal and specific
•No artificial drama

Style Guide

For detailed voice guidelines, see style-guide.md

Process

•Read the content
•Flag issues with brief explanation
•Don't rewrite - let author fix in their voice

Response Format

Keep it conversational:

code

This section feels generic - you mention "users might want" but where's YOUR experience? 

Also caught an idiom: "hit the ground running" might confuse non-native speakers. Try more direct language.

The technical explanation is great though - clear and accessible.