REFRESH Command - Systematic Re-Diagnosis

This command performs systematic re-diagnosis when an AI agent gets stuck on a coding task or when a previous attempt has failed to resolve an issue.

Key Principles

Do NOT Jump to Solutions

•No fixing until the root cause is CONFIRMED through investigation
•Evidence-based diagnosis only
•Systematic exploration, not trial-and-error

Broaden Before Narrowing

•Start with a wide view of the system
•Map the architecture
•Then narrow down based on evidence

Document Everything

•All hypotheses
•All investigation steps
•All evidence found
•All conclusions drawn

Transparent Communication

•Explain what you're investigating and why
•Share findings as you go
•Be clear about confidence level

Workflow

Based on the persistent user query about a problem that likely failed to resolve previously, follow these steps:

Step 1. Load Memory Bank Files

Read:

•memory-bank/projectbrief.md
•memory-bank/systemPatterns.md
•memory-bank/techContext.md

Step 2. Progress Tracking

CRITICAL: Plan and track your diagnostics in a unique Task List File, distinct from any parent task's Task List.

•Locate or create: memory-bank/troubleshooting/troubleshooting-<timestamp>.md
•This task list is for THIS diagnostic session only
•Always identify the correct Task List File before making updates

Step 3. Step Back & Re-Scope

Forget the specifics of the last failed attempt. Broaden your focus.

•
Identify the core functionality or system component(s) involved in the reported problem
- •Examples: authentication flow, data processing pipeline, specific UI component interaction, infrastructure resource provisioning
•Do NOT assume you know the cause yet
•Think about the system holistically

Step 4. Map the Relevant System Structure

Use tools to map out the high-level structure and key interaction points of the identified component(s):

•list_dir: Understand directory structure
•glob_file_search: Find relevant files by pattern
•codebase_search: Understand how components interact
•read_file: Read configuration files, entry points

Goal: Gain a "pyramid view" - see the overall architecture first before diving into details.

Document findings in the troubleshooting task list.

Step 5. Hypothesize Potential Root Causes (Broadly)

Based on the system map and the problem description, generate a broad list of potential areas where the root cause might lie:

Examples:

•Configuration error
•Incorrect API call
•Upstream data issue
•Logic flaw in module X
•Dependency conflict
•Infrastructure misconfiguration
•Incorrect permissions
•Path resolution issues
•Environment-specific problems

Do NOT pick one yet. List them all.

Step 6. Systematic Investigation & Evidence Gathering

Prioritize and investigate the most likely hypotheses using targeted tool usage:

Step 6a. Validate Configurations

•Use read_file to check all relevant configuration files
•Look for typos, wrong paths, incorrect values
•Verify environment-specific configurations

Step 6b. Trace Execution Flow

•Use grep or codebase_search to trace the execution path related to the failing functionality
•
Add temporary, descriptive logging via search_replace if necessary and safe
- •Request approval if the change is risky
•Pinpoint where the failure actually occurs

Step 6c. Check Dependencies & External Interactions

•Verify versions and statuses of dependencies
•
If external systems are involved, use safe commands to assess their state
- •Use run_terminal_cmd for diagnostics like status checks
- •Set require_user_approval=true if needed

Step 6d. Examine Logs

•If logs are accessible and relevant, retrieve them
•Analyze recent entries related to the failure
•Look for error messages, stack traces, warnings

Document all findings in the troubleshooting task list with evidence.

Step 7. Identify the Confirmed Root Cause

Based only on the evidence gathered through tool-based investigation, pinpoint the specific, confirmed root cause.

Do NOT guess. If investigation is inconclusive:

•Report findings clearly
•Suggest the next most logical diagnostic step
•Request user input if truly blocked

Step 8. Propose a Targeted Solution

Once the root cause is confirmed, propose a precise fix that directly addresses it.

Explain:

•What the root cause is
•Why this fix targets the identified root cause
•How the fix will resolve the issue

Step 9. Plan Comprehensive Verification

Outline how you will verify that the proposed fix:

•Resolves the original issue
•Does NOT introduce regressions

Verification must cover:

•Relevant positive cases
•Negative cases
•Edge cases applicable to the fixed component

Step 10. Execute & Verify

Implement the fix using appropriate tools:

•search_replace for code changes
•run_terminal_cmd for commands (with appropriate safety approvals)

Execute the comprehensive verification plan:

•Run tests
•Check for regressions
•Verify the fix works as intended

Document results in the troubleshooting task list.

Step 11. Report Outcome

Succinctly report:

•The identified root cause
•The fix applied
•The results of comprehensive verification
•Confirmation that the issue is resolved

Update memory-bank/tasks.md and memory-bank/progress.md with the resolution.

Step 12: Phase Transition

After successfully diagnosing and fixing the issue:

•Update the parent task's task list with the resolution
•Load the appropriate complexity level-specific Niko workflow file, then use its phase mappings to resume the phase that was interrupted.

If the issue could not be resolved, stop and wait for operator input. You're done for now.