Rust Testing Excellence

When to Use This Skill

Read this when writing or reviewing tests (not implementation or async code). This covers:

•Unit tests, integration tests, benchmarks
•Validating both valid AND invalid inputs
•Feature-gated test modules
•Property-based testing
•Avoiding false-positive tests

Do NOT read this for:

•Implementation → See rust-clean-implementation
•Async code → See rust-with-async-code

Core Testing Principles

The Three Test Validations ✅

Every meaningful test MUST validate:

•Input Validation - Verify inputs are handled correctly
•Output Verification - Confirm result matches expectations
•Error Path Testing - Ensure error conditions produce appropriate errors

rust

// BAD ❌ - Creates variable with no assertions
#[test]
fn test_process() {
    let result = process("valid_input").unwrap(); // Assumes success!
}

// GOOD ✅ - Validates both success and error paths
#[test]
fn test_process_valid_input() {
    let result = process("valid_input");
    assert!(result.is_ok(), "valid input should succeed");
    assert_eq!(result.unwrap().len(), 11);
}

#[test]
fn test_process_invalid_input() {
    let result = process("");
    assert_eq!(result, Err(Error::EmptyInput));
}

Anti-Pattern: Muted Variables Without Assertions

CRITICAL: Tests that create variables but never validate their content are FORBIDDEN.

rust

// BAD ❌ - False confidence, no validation
#[test]
fn test_user_creation() {
    let user = User::new("Alice", "alice@example.com");
    // Variable created but NEVER checked!
}

// GOOD ✅ - Explicit validation
#[test]
fn test_user_creation() {
    let user = User::new("Alice", "alice@example.com")
        .expect("should create user");

    assert_eq!(user.name, "Alice");
    assert_eq!(user.email(), "alice@example.com");
    assert!(user.id() > 0);
}

Test Organization

Test Location Conventions

CRITICAL: Rust has specific conventions for where to place tests:

1. Unit Tests - Inside Source Files

rust

// src/lib.rs or src/module.rs
pub fn public_function() -> Result<()> {
    private_helper()
}

fn private_helper() -> Result<()> {
    Ok(())
}

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
    use super::*;

    #[test]
    fn test_private_helper() {
        // Unit tests can access private functions
        assert!(private_helper().is_ok());
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_public_function() {
        assert!(public_function().is_ok());
    }
}

2. Integration Tests - At Project Root

code

project_root/
├── Cargo.toml
├── src/
│   └── lib.rs
└── tests/                      # Integration tests at project root
    ├── crate_name/             # Organize by crate name
    │   ├── api_tests.rs
    │   ├── authentication.rs
    │   └── error_handling.rs
    └── common/                 # Shared test utilities
        └── mod.rs

rust

// tests/crate_name/api_tests.rs
use my_crate::prelude::*; // Only public API

#[test]
fn test_full_workflow() {
    let service = Service::new();
    let result = service.process("input");
    assert!(result.is_ok());
}

3. Benchmarks - At Project Root

code

project_root/
├── Cargo.toml
└── benches/                    # Benchmarks at project root
    └── crate_name/             # Organize by crate name
        ├── parsing.rs
        └── serialization.rs

toml

# Cargo.toml
[[bench]]
name = "crate_name_parsing"
harness = false
path = "benches/crate_name/parsing.rs"

[dev-dependencies]
criterion = { version = "0.5", features = ["html_reports"] }

Feature-Gated Tests

Use Module-Level Gates, Not Individual Attributes

MANDATORY: Group feature-specific tests into modules with #[cfg(...)] at module level.

rust

// BAD ❌ - Individual test attributes scattered
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
    #[test]
    #[cfg(not(feature = "std"))]
    fn test_spinlock_basic() { }

    #[test]
    #[cfg(not(feature = "std"))]
    fn test_spinlock_contention() { }

    #[test]
    #[cfg(feature = "std")]
    fn test_std_mutex() { }
}

// GOOD ✅ - Feature-gated test modules
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
    use super::*;

    // Common tests for all configurations
    #[test]
    fn test_basic_functionality() {
        // Works with both std and no_std
    }

    // No-std specific tests grouped together
    #[cfg(not(feature = "std"))]
    mod nostd_tests {
        use super::*;

        #[test]
        fn test_spinlock_basic() {
            // SpinLock only available in no_std
        }

        #[test]
        fn test_spinlock_contention() { }
    }

    // Std-specific tests grouped together
    #[cfg(feature = "std")]
    mod std_tests {
        use super::*;

        #[test]
        fn test_std_mutex_threading() {
            // Test with real OS threads
        }
    }
}

Benefits:

•✅ Clear organization - see which tests run in which configuration
•✅ Single location for feature changes
•✅ Better test output and maintainability
•✅ Feature-specific imports scoped to relevant module

Async Test Isolation

MANDATORY: See Async Test Isolation in rust-with-async-code for complete patterns.

Quick reference: Always use flavor = "current_thread" for async tests to prevent test isolation issues with global state.

Property-Based Testing (Recommended)

Use proptest to test invariants across hundreds of generated inputs automatically.

Why Property-Based Testing?

Property-based testing is highly recommended for:

•✅ Testing invariants (properties that should always hold)
•✅ Finding edge cases you didn't think of
•✅ Serialization/deserialization roundtrips
•✅ Parsers and data transformations
•✅ Mathematical operations (commutativity, associativity, etc.)
•✅ State machines and protocols

Basic Usage

rust

use proptest::prelude::*;

proptest! {
    #[test]
    fn test_valid_inputs_produce_valid_outputs(
        name in "[a-zA-Z]+",
        value in 0i32..100,
    ) {
        let user = User::new(&name);
        prop_assert!(user.is_ok());

        let result = process_value(user.unwrap(), value);
        prop_assert!(result.is_ok());
        prop_assert!(result.unwrap() >= 0);
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_idempotency(input in "[a-zA-Z]+") {
        let first = compute_hash(&input);
        let second = compute_hash(&input);
        prop_assert_eq!(first, second,
            "Hash computation should be deterministic");
    }
}

Common Property Testing Patterns

Roundtrip Properties (serialization):

rust

proptest! {
    #[test]
    fn test_json_roundtrip(user in any::<User>()) {
        let json = serde_json::to_string(&user)?;
        let decoded: User = serde_json::from_str(&json)?;
        prop_assert_eq!(user, decoded);
    }
}

Invariant Properties (never panic):

rust

proptest! {
    #[test]
    fn test_parser_never_panics(input in ".*") {
        // Should never panic, regardless of input
        let _ = parse_input(&input);
    }
}

Relationship Properties (commutativity):

rust

proptest! {
    #[test]
    fn test_addition_commutative(a in 0i32..1000, b in 0i32..1000) {
        prop_assert_eq!(add(a, b), add(b, a));
    }
}

When to Use Property-Based Testing

Use Case	Example Property
Serialization	`deserialize(serialize(x)) == x`
Parsing	`parse` never panics on any input
Encoding	`decode(encode(x)) == x`
Sorting	Output is sorted and contains same elements
Hashing	`hash(x) == hash(x)` (deterministic)
Reversible operations	`reverse(reverse(x)) == x`

Dependencies

Add to Cargo.toml:

toml

[dev-dependencies]
proptest = "1.4"

Common Pitfalls

Pitfall 1: Testing Implementation Details

rust

// BAD ❌ - Tests internal state
let internal_state = obj.get_internal_map();
assert_eq!(*internal_state.last_key(), "expected");

// GOOD ✅ - Tests observable behavior
obj.process("input");
assert!(obj.result().contains("output"));

Pitfall 2: No Error Path Testing

rust

// BAD ❌ - Only tests success path
#[test]
fn test_valid_input() {
    assert!(process(valid_data).is_ok());
}

// GOOD ✅ - Tests both paths
#[test]
fn test_valid_input() {
    assert!(process(valid_data).is_ok());
}

#[test]
fn test_invalid_input() {
    assert_eq!(process(""), Err(Error::EmptyInput));
    assert_eq!(process(too_long), Err(Error::InputTooLong));
}

Pitfall 3: Missing Initialization in Tests

rust

// BAD ❌ - Pool never initialized
#[test]
fn test_threaded_operation() {
    let mut executor = ThreadPool::new(4);
    // MISSING: No initialization call!
    assert!(executor.is_ready());
}

// GOOD ✅ - Properly initializes and validates
#[test]
fn test_threaded_operation() {
    let mut thread_pool = ExecutorPool::with_capacity(4);

    // MANDATORY: Initialize before testing
    assert!(thread_pool.initialize().is_ok(),
        "Pool must initialize successfully");

    // Now validate actual behavior
    assert!(thread_pool.is_ready());
}

Test Helper Functions

Create reusable helpers for common test setup:

rust

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
    use super::*;

    fn create_test_user(name: &str) -> User {
        User::new(name, format!("{}@test.com", name))
            .expect("should create test user")
    }

    fn assert_valid_result(result: &Result<Data>) {
        assert!(result.is_ok(), "result should be Ok");
        let data = result.as_ref().unwrap();
        assert!(!data.is_empty(), "data should not be empty");
    }

    #[test]
    fn test_multiple_users() {
        let alice = create_test_user("alice");
        let bob = create_test_user("bob");

        assert_ne!(alice.id(), bob.id());
    }
}

Running Tests

bash

# Run all tests (unit + integration + doc tests)
cargo test

# Run only unit tests
cargo test --lib

# Run only integration tests
cargo test --test '*'

# Run specific integration test file
cargo test --test api_tests

# Run only doc tests
cargo test --doc

# Run with specific feature flags
cargo test --features "std"
cargo test --no-default-features

# Run benchmarks
cargo bench
cargo bench --bench crate_name_parsing

Valid Test Requirements

Tests are considered valid when they:

•✅ Compile with cargo test
•✅ Have explicit assertions on outputs
•✅ Test both valid and invalid inputs
•✅ Test error paths, not just success
•✅ Don't test implementation details
•✅ Are properly isolated (use current_thread for async)
•✅ Have clear, descriptive names
•✅ Include documentation comments for complex tests

Learning Log

2026-01-28: Skill Restructuring

Issue: Original skill.md was 1059 lines with extensive duplication.

Learning: Consolidated feature-gating patterns, removed duplicated test organization examples, streamlined into focused sections.

New Standard: Test skill reduced to ~450 lines focusing on core patterns and anti-patterns.

2026-01-27: False Positive Test Prevention

Issue: Tests creating variables without validation were passing CI but catching no bugs.

Learning: Every test must have at least one explicit assertion validating behavior.

Standard: All tests must validate actual outputs, not just execute code paths.

Examples

See examples/ directory for comprehensive guides:

•intro-to-property-based-testing.md - Complete beginner to advanced guide on property-based testing with proptest, including exercises and real-world examples

Related Skills

•Rust Clean Implementation - For implementation patterns
•Rust with Async Code - For async testing patterns

Last Updated: 2026-01-28 Version: 3.1-approved