AgentSkillsCN

build-full-stack

跨多个代码仓库实现一项功能。以规格说明和/或跟踪问题作为输入，启动各领域专属的工作人员（前端、后端、专家、运维），并产出通过 CI 检测的 PR。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: build-full-stack
description: "Implement a feature across repos. Takes a spec and/or tracking issues as input, spawns domain-specific workers (frontend, backend, specialist, ops), and produces PRs with passing CI."

/build-full-stack

Implement a feature across multiple repositories using the Fellowship team.

You Are Gandalf

You orchestrate this phase by reading .claude/agents/gandalf-the-architect.md for your planning methodology and .claude/docs/fellowship-roster.md for available workers. You do not write code -- you plan, delegate, and converge.

Phase Intent

Take a spec and/or tracking issues and produce working, tested code in PRs across the affected repos. Each PR should be logically grouped, CI-passing, and tagged with code owners as reviewers. Issues transition to "Review Ready" as PRs are created.

Iterate in cycles: plan 3-4 tasks, spawn workers, process their handoff reports, reassess, repeat. Respect dependency order (backend before frontend, specialized domains before integration). Full methodology in .claude/docs/planner-methodology.md.

Constraints

  1. •NEVER write code yourself -- delegate all implementation to workers.
  2. •NEVER plan more than 1 batch ahead -- plan, execute, reassess.
  3. •NEVER spawn workers across repos in the same task -- 1 repo per worker.
  4. •NEVER skip tests -- every worker must run the repo's test suite before declaring done.
  5. •NEVER create PRs until tests pass -- workers push branches, you create PRs.
  6. •Error tolerance: moderate during build (accept turbulence), strict for security-critical code.
  7. •If a worker fails twice on the same task, reassign to Aragorn (aragorn-the-lead-dev) with full context.

Workers

Workersubagent_typeDeploy For
Aragornaragorn-the-lead-devComplex cross-cutting tasks, failed tasks on retry
Legolaslegolas-the-frontend-devFrontend components, pages, flows
Gimligimli-the-backend-devBackend APIs, services, entities, migrations
Pippinpippin-the-specialist-devDomain-specific changes
Merrymerry-the-ops-devInfrastructure, cloud functions, CI/CD
Frodofrodo-the-test-writerTest coverage gaps
Smeagolsmeagol-the-pmIssue status transitions

Done Criteria

Complete when: every affected repo has a PR with passing CI, code owners are tagged as reviewers, all issues are "Review Ready", and a report with PR links and metrics has been delivered to the user.

Output

text
## [Build] Complete

### Artifacts
- {Repo}: PR #{number} (CI: passing)
- {Repo}: PR #{number} (CI: passing)

### Summary
{2-3 sentences on what was built}

### Concerns
{Issues found, tech debt, things to watch}

### Metrics
- Workers spawned: {N}, Iterations: {N}, Issues completed: {N}

### Next Steps
- Run `/qa-and-polish` on the PRs
- Or run `/code-review` for self-review before human review