AgentSkillsCN

rsn-learning-outcomes

从经验中汲取洞见,提升绩效。采用单环学习(修正行动)、双环学习(修正框架)、反思(提取洞见)、实验(检验信念)以及校准(调整信心)等多种模式。当您需要纠正失误、从结果中汲取教训、检验假设,或改进预测时,可选用此技能。触发关键词包括:“为什么这次失败了?”、“我们能学到什么?”、“来试试这个”、“我们的预测有多准确?”、“失败的规律是什么?”

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: rsn-learning-outcomes
description: Extracts insights and improves performance from experience. Applies single-loop (fix action), double-loop (fix frame), reflection (extract insight), experimentation (test belief), and calibration (adjust confidence) modes. Use when correcting mistakes, learning from outcomes, testing hypotheses, or improving predictions. Triggers on "why did this fail", "what can we learn", "test this", "how accurate are we", "pattern of failures".
license: Complete terms in LICENSE.txt

Learning

Systematic improvement from experience. Convert outcomes into better future performance.

Core Principle

Learning is not automatic. Experience without reflection is just repetition. Learning requires deliberate extraction of insight and updating of beliefs and behaviors.

code
Experience → Extract → Update → Apply → Better Outcomes

Mode Selection

ModeQuestionOutputTrigger
Single-loopDid action work?Corrected actionGap between expected/actual
Double-loopIs frame right?Updated framePattern of single-loop failures
ReflectionWhat can we learn?Transferable insightsExperience completed
ExperimentationShould we test this?Validated/invalidated beliefBelief needs validation
CalibrationHow accurate are we?Adjusted confidence rulesPredictions need tuning

Decision Tree

code
Is there a gap between expected and actual?
  YES → Is this a pattern (3+ similar failures)?
    YES → Double-loop (question the frame)
    NO  → Single-loop (fix the action)
  NO  ↓
Has an experience completed?
  YES → Reflection (extract insights)
  NO  ↓
Do you have a belief that needs validation before commitment?
  YES → Experimentation (test the belief)
  NO  ↓
Have predictions been consistently off?
  YES → Calibration (adjust confidence)
  NO  → No learning mode needed

Mode Summaries

Single-Loop

Purpose: Correct action within existing frame.

Mental model: Thermostat — detect deviation, adjust action, return to target. The goal is not questioned.

Process: Gap detected → Diagnose cause → Identify correction → Verify fix → Prevent recurrence

Key rules:

  • Fix the proximate cause
  • Don't question the goal (yet)
  • Add prevention to avoid repeat
  • Check: is this a pattern? If yes → double-loop

Output: Corrected action with prevention

references/single-loop.md


Double-Loop

Purpose: Question and update the frame itself.

Mental model: Not just adjusting thermostat, but asking: "Is heating the right goal?"

Process: Pattern detected → Examine current frame → Challenge assumptions → Construct new frame → Validate change

Key rules:

  • Requires 3+ single-loop failures (pattern)
  • Articulate current frame (goals, assumptions, constraints)
  • Challenge each element with evidence
  • Test new frame before full commitment

Output: Updated frame with validation plan

references/double-loop.md


Reflection

Purpose: Extract transferable insight from experience.

Mental model: Mine the experience for reusable gold.

Process: Capture experience → Analyze what worked/didn't → Extract insights → Update beliefs → Create artifacts → Disseminate

Key rules:

  • Reflection is scheduled, not accidental
  • Analyze both successes and failures
  • Specify conditions when insight applies
  • Create persistent artifacts (heuristics, playbooks, checklists)

Output: Insights and artifacts for future use

references/reflection.md


Experimentation

Purpose: Test belief through deliberate action before commitment.

Mental model: Scientific method applied to operational decisions.

Process: Formulate hypothesis → Design experiment → Execute → Analyze results → Conclude → Act

Key rules:

  • Hypothesis must be falsifiable
  • Define success criteria before testing
  • Control variables where possible
  • Don't peek at results early

Output: Validated or invalidated belief with next steps

references/experimentation.md


Calibration

Purpose: Adjust prediction confidence based on track record.

Mental model: Weather forecaster — when I say 80% confident, it should be right 80% of the time.

Process: Assemble track record → Stratify by confidence level → Calculate calibration error → Identify patterns → Define adjustment rules

Key rules:

  • Need 30+ predictions for meaningful calibration
  • Stratify by domain (calibration varies)
  • Adjust gradually, not dramatically
  • Monitor ongoing calibration

Output: Calibration adjustment rules

references/calibration.md


Output Format

Every learning output includes:

markdown
## [Mode]: [Topic]

**Trigger:** [What triggered this learning mode]

**Analysis:**
[Mode-specific analysis]

**Conclusion:**
[What was learned/changed]

**Artifacts:**
- [Any persistent outputs: rules, checklists, playbooks]

**Next:**
- [Actions to take]
- [What to monitor]

Mode Transitions

FromToTrigger
Single-loopDouble-loopPattern detected (3+ similar failures)
Double-loopExperimentationNew frame needs validation
ExperimentationReflectionExperiment completed
ReflectionCalibrationPredictions were off
AnySingle-loopNew gap detected

Learning → Other Skills Handoff

Learning OutputNext Skill
Corrected actionCausal (execute)
New frameThinking (reason with new assumptions)
Insight about perceptionPerceiving (adjust attention)
Validated hypothesisCausal (plan rollout)
Calibration ruleAll thinking modes (adjust confidence)

Anti-Patterns

AvoidDo Instead
No reflection timeSchedule deliberate reflection
Blame focusFocus on system/process
Premature double-loopRequire pattern of failures
Peeking at experiment resultsWait for full duration
Over-adjusting calibrationGradual adjustments
Insight hoardingPlan dissemination

References

FileContent
single-loop.mdAction correction within frame
double-loop.mdFrame examination and update
reflection.mdInsight extraction process
experimentation.mdHypothesis testing methods
calibration.mdConfidence adjustment