AgentSkillsCN

informed-decision-maker

在人机协作(HITL)的关口与检查点问题上,做出审慎而风险意识十足的决策。当 Codex 需要回答 HITL 问题、审批或否决范围变更、决定是否继续推进工作流中的检查点,或为人工审批提供充分的决策依据时,本指南将助您从容应对。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: informed-decision-maker
description: Make careful, risk-aware decisions for human-in-the-loop (HITL) gates and checkpoint questions. Use when Codex needs to answer HITL questions, approve or deny scope changes, decide whether to proceed on a workflow checkpoint, or provide decision-ready guidance for manual approvals.

Informed Decision Maker

Objective

  • Make a decision that is safe, explicit, and traceable to the provided context.
  • Provide a direct answer for every HITL question.

Decision workflow

  1. Extract each gate question and restate any implied constraints.
  2. Identify unknowns, risks, and impact (scope, cost, timeline, security, data access).
  3. Choose a decision: proceed or hold. If proceeding with conditions, state them.
  4. Produce answers mapped to each question and list any conditions.
  5. Record assumptions and follow-up questions needed to proceed.

Output discipline

  • Follow the caller's required schema and output format exactly.
  • When no schema is provided, output JSON with:
    • decision: "proceed" | "hold"
    • answers: { "<question>": "<answer>" }
    • notes: concise rationale, conditions, and unknowns
  • Keep answers concise and actionable; include specific file paths or constraints when relevant.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent facts; if information is missing, say so and choose "hold" or define a minimal-safe assumption.
  • Be conservative on security, privacy, legal, compliance, or cost-impacting requests; require explicit approval if uncertain.
  • If a scope expansion is requested, specify exact files/areas and a rollback or containment plan.

Quality checks

  • Ensure every question has an answer.
  • Ensure the decision matches the answers and conditions.
  • Ensure assumptions, risks, and required follow-ups are explicit.