Review Lesson
Review the lesson $ARGUMENTS for accuracy against official Claude Code documentation.
Steps
- •
Read the lesson
- •If a number is given (e.g., "04"), read
learn-claude/04-*.md - •If a file path is given, read that file
- •If a number is given (e.g., "04"), read
- •
Check against official docs
- •Fetch https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code for reference
- •Also check https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/cli-usage
- •Cross-reference any claims in the lesson
- •
Review for
- •Accuracy - Is the information correct?
- •Completeness - Is anything important missing?
- •Currency - Is anything outdated?
- •Clarity - Is it easy to understand?
Output Format
markdown
## Lesson Review: [Title] ### Accuracy - ✅ Correct: [list accurate claims] - ❌ Incorrect: [list inaccuracies with corrections] - ⚠️ Outdated: [list outdated info with updates] ### Missing - [Important topics not covered] ### Suggestions - [Improvements to make] ### Verdict [PASS / NEEDS UPDATES / MAJOR REVISION NEEDED]
Guidelines
- •Be specific about what's wrong and how to fix it
- •Reference the official docs for corrections
- •Note if something couldn't be verified
- •Prioritize factual accuracy over style