AgentSkillsCN

perspective-swarm

借助 5 个并行代理,以信心加权的方式进行多视角头脑风暴与综合。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: perspective-swarm
description: Multi-perspective brainstorming via 5 parallel agents with confidence-weighted synthesis
version: 1.0.0
tags: [brainstorming, multi-agent, synthesis, parallel, decision-support]

perspective-swarm

Enable rapid multi-perspective brainstorming through parallel agent execution, producing a confidence-weighted synthesis that surfaces convergent insights and divergent alternatives.

When to Use

  • You need diverse viewpoints on a decision, problem, or creative challenge
  • Time is limited (15-30 minutes) but you want rigorous multi-angle analysis
  • You want to identify both consensus themes and unique insights
  • The problem benefits from optimistic, critical, analytical, innovative, and pragmatic lenses

When NOT to Use

  • Deep literature review needed (use lit-pm instead)
  • Single-perspective analysis is sufficient
  • Implementation or execution is the goal (this produces analysis only)
  • Domain-specific expertise required (this uses general archetypes)

Workflow Overview

code
                  User
                  Prompt
                    |
           +-------v-------+
           | Stage 1:      | Frame problem, validate input
           | FRAMING       | Generate 5 agent prompts
           +-------+-------+
                   |
                   | [Optional: User confirms framing]
                   |
+------------------v-----------------------------------+
| Stage 2: DIVERGING (Parallel)                       |
| +-----+ +-----+ +-----+ +-----+ +-----+             |
| |Opt. | |Crit.| |Anal.| |Innov| |Prag.|             |
| +--+--+ +--+--+ +--+--+ +--+--+ +--+--+             |
+----+-------+-------+-------+-------+-----------------+
     +-------+-------+-------+-------+
                     |
              +------v------+
              | Stage 3:    | Identify convergent/divergent insights
              | CONVERGING  | Apply confidence weighting
              +------+------+
                     |
              +------v------+
              | Stage 4:    | Present synthesis
              | OUTPUT      | Accept / Refine / Handoff to lit-pm
              +-------------+

Detailed Workflow

Stage 1: Problem Framing (2-5 minutes)

State: FRAMING

  1. Validate user prompt:

    • Minimum 10 characters
    • Maximum 1000 characters
    • At least one clear question or challenge
    • No prohibited content
  2. Identify problem type: decision | creative | analytical | strategic

  3. Reframe challenge in neutral language (no leading/biasing)

  4. Generate 5 archetype-specific prompts (see references/persona-archetypes.md)

  5. Create session directory: /tmp/swarm-session-{YYYYMMDD}-{HHMMSS}-{uuid4-8char}/

    • {uuid4-8char} is the first 8 characters of a uuid4 (e.g., a1b2c3d4)
  6. Create session lock: Write .session.lock file with workflow_id and timestamp

    • Lock prevents concurrent access to same session
    • Stale locks (> 30 minutes) may be overwritten
  7. Save framing output: stage-1-framing.yaml

Quality Gate:

  • Problem clearly articulated
  • All 5 agent prompts generated
  • No leading/biasing language in framing

Optional Checkpoint: Present reframed challenge to user before proceeding to Stage 2. User can:

  • Approve and continue
  • Refine the framing
  • Abort

Stage 2: Parallel Perspective Generation (5-15 minutes)

State: DIVERGING

Launch 5 parallel agents. Each agent:

  1. Adopts archetype lens (Optimist, Critic, Analyst, Innovator, Pragmatist)

  2. Conducts brief research: 1-2 WebSearch queries

    • On WebSearch failure: proceed with reasoning-only, reduce confidence by 1
  3. Generates perspective report (target ~2000 tokens):

    • Key insight (1-2 sentences)
    • Supporting evidence (2-3 bullet points with sources)
    • Confidence level (1-5, self-assessed)
    • Blind spots acknowledged
  4. Saves output: perspectives/{archetype}.md

Token Budget Note: The 2000 token target is advisory. Agents are instructed to target ~2000 tokens but enforcement is prompt-based only. Slight overages are acceptable; significant overages should be flagged in validation warnings.

Timeouts:

  • Per-agent: 10 minutes
  • Stage total: 15 minutes
  • On timeout: Mark incomplete, proceed with available

Quality Gate (per agent):

  • Key insight present (required)
  • At least 1 evidence point (required)
  • Confidence level 1-5 (required, clamp if out of range)
  • Blind spots acknowledged (required)

Minimum agents required: 4 of 5

On < 4 agents: Present user options:

code
PERSPECTIVE GENERATION INCOMPLETE: Only {N} of 5 agents completed

Completed: {list}
Failed: {list with reasons}

Options:
(A) Retry failed agents (estimated +5 min)
(B) Proceed with {N} perspectives (reduced diversity)
(C) Abort workflow

Stage 3: Convergence Analysis & Synthesis (5-10 minutes)

State: CONVERGING

  1. Collect all perspective outputs

  2. Identify convergent insights:

    • Themes appearing in 2+ perspectives
    • Apply confidence weighting (see references/convergence-algorithm.md)
  3. Identify divergent insights:

    • Unique insights from single perspectives
    • Attribute to originating archetype
  4. Handle missing archetypes (if 4 agents):

    MissingCompensation
    OptimistAdd: "Consider opportunities we may be missing"
    CriticAdd explicit risk caveat section
    AnalystNote reduced quantitative rigor
    InnovatorNote potentially conservative recommendations
    PragmatistFlag implementation feasibility as uncertain
  5. Resolve conflicts:

    • Present all sides neutrally
    • Note evidence strength for each
    • Do NOT force artificial consensus
  6. Generate synthesis document: stage-3-synthesis.md

Quality Gate:

  • All available perspectives incorporated
  • At least 2 convergent insights OR explicit "portfolio of options" framing
  • At least 3 divergent insights captured
  • Conflicts presented neutrally
  • Blind spots aggregated

Stage 4: User Review & Optional Handoff

State: AWAITING_USER

Present synthesis to user with options:

code
## Synthesis Complete

[Executive summary]

**Options:**
(A) Accept - Workflow complete
(B) Refine - Provide feedback, return to Stage 3
(C) Deep dive - Hand off to lit-pm for comprehensive literature review

On Accept: State -> COMPLETED On Refine: State -> CONVERGING (with user feedback) On Deep dive: Generate handoff-payload.yaml, invoke lit-pm

Session Directory Structure

code
/tmp/swarm-session-{YYYYMMDD}-{HHMMSS}-{uuid4-8char}/
├── .session.lock                   # Prevents concurrent access
├── workflow-state.yaml             # Resumable state
├── stage-1-framing.yaml            # Problem framing output
├── perspectives/                   # Parallel outputs
│   ├── optimist.md
│   ├── critic.md
│   ├── analyst.md
│   ├── innovator.md
│   └── pragmatist.md
├── stage-3-synthesis.md            # Final synthesis
└── handoff-payload.yaml            # (if lit-pm requested)

State Machine

code
States: INITIALIZED | FRAMING | DIVERGING | CONVERGING | AWAITING_USER | COMPLETED | FAILED | ABORTED

Transitions:
  INITIALIZED -> FRAMING     : on session start
  FRAMING -> DIVERGING       : on framing complete (+ optional user confirmation)
  DIVERGING -> CONVERGING    : on min 4 agents complete
  DIVERGING -> FAILED        : on < 4 agents AND user chooses abort
  CONVERGING -> AWAITING_USER: on synthesis complete
  AWAITING_USER -> CONVERGING: on user refinement request
  AWAITING_USER -> COMPLETED : on user accept
  AWAITING_USER -> COMPLETED : on successful lit-pm handoff
  ANY -> ABORTED             : on user abort
  ANY -> FAILED              : on unrecoverable error

Note: The state machine has 8 states total (INITIALIZED, FRAMING, DIVERGING, CONVERGING, AWAITING_USER, COMPLETED, FAILED, ABORTED).

Session Lock Protocol

On session initialization:

  1. Create .session.lock file in session directory
  2. Write content: {workflow_id}\n{ISO8601_timestamp}
  3. Before any operation, verify lock file matches current workflow_id

On resume detection:

  1. Check if .session.lock exists
  2. If lock timestamp > 30 minutes old, consider stale and overwritable
  3. If lock is fresh (< 30 minutes), warn user that session may be in use
yaml
# .session.lock format
workflow_id: swarm-20260204-183000-a1b2c3d4
locked_at: 2026-02-04T18:30:00Z

Error Handling

WebSearch Failure

yaml
classification:
  transient: retry after 30 seconds
  rate_limited: exponential backoff (30s, 60s, 120s)
  no_results: proceed without search, note "limited research"
  service_down: proceed with reasoning-only, reduce confidence by 1

fallback_behavior:
  - Agent proceeds with pure reasoning
  - Marks output as "unverified by external sources"
  - Auto-reduces confidence by 1 level

Session Recovery

On skill invocation, check for existing sessions:

code
Found incomplete session from {timestamp}: {original_prompt}
Session state: {stage} - {status}

Options:
(A) Resume from {checkpoint}
(B) Start fresh (archives previous)
(C) Abort

Resource Limits

yaml
resource_limits:
  max_concurrent_agents: 5
  max_websearch_per_agent: 2
  max_webfetch_per_agent: 1
  target_tokens_per_perspective: 2000  # Advisory, not enforced
  session_expiry: 24 hours

Timeout Configuration

StageTimeoutExceeded Action
1 (Framing)5 minEscalate to user
2 (Perspectives)15 min totalProceed with available (min 4)
2 (per agent)10 minMark incomplete, proceed
3 (Synthesis)10 minDeliver partial synthesis
4 (User Review)No timeoutUser-controlled
Global45 minSafety ceiling, escalate

Quality Gates Summary

GateStagePass Threshold
Input Validation1Prompt meets criteria
Framing1All checks pass
Per-Agent24/4 required elements
Minimum Coverage2>= 4 of 5 agents
Synthesis3All checks pass
User Approval4Accept, Refine, or Handoff

Dependencies

  • lit-pm - Optional handoff target for deep literature review
  • Adapts patterns from: parallel-coordinator, synthesizer

Notes

  • Parallel Independence: Perspective agents MUST NOT see each other's outputs during Stage 2. This preserves diversity and prevents premature convergence (research-validated).

  • No Forced Consensus: The synthesis should present conflicts neutrally. Disagreement between perspectives is valuable signal, not noise.

  • Divergent Value: Unique insights from a single perspective may be the most valuable output. Do not penalize or bury non-convergent views.

  • Research Limitation: This skill provides rapid analysis (15-30 min), not comprehensive research. For deep dives, hand off to lit-pm.

References

Examples