Plan Gap Analysis
Analyze gaps between documented plans in plans/ and actual implementation.
Workflow
Phase 1: Plan Inventory
Read all plan files:
- •
00-overview.md- Project summary and metrics - •
01-understand.md- Requirements and components - •
02-plan.md- Architecture decisions and roadmap - •
03-execute.md- Implementation details - •
04-review.md- Quality requirements - •
05-secure.md- Security requirements - •
06-feedback-loop.md- Refinements
Phase 2: Codebase Inventory
bash
# List all crates find . -name "Cargo.toml" -not -path "*/target/*" # List source files find . -name "*.rs" -not -path "*/target/*"
Crates to analyze:
- •
memory-core- Core data structures and orchestration - •
memory-storage-turso- Turso/libSQL backend - •
memory-storage-redb- redb cache layer - •
memory-mcp- MCP server and sandbox - •
test-utils- Test utilities - •
benches- Performance benchmarks
Phase 3: Gap Identification
Check each phase:
| Phase | Focus Areas |
|---|---|
| UNDERSTAND | Data structures, type definitions |
| PLAN | Architectural decisions, success metrics |
| EXECUTE | Storage, learning, MCP features |
| REVIEW | FR1-FR7, NFR1-NFR6 tests |
| SECURE | Attack surfaces, mitigations |
| FEEDBACK | Edge cases, optimizations |
Phase 4: Prioritization
Critical (Blocks production):
- •Security vulnerabilities
- •Data corruption risks
- •Missing core functionality
High (Affects quality):
- •Performance targets not met
- •Test coverage below target
- •Missing error handling
Medium (Technical debt):
- •Code quality issues
- •Documentation gaps
Phase 5: TODO Generation
markdown
## Phase [N]: [NAME] ### Critical Priority - [ ] [Component] - [Missing item] - File: path/to/file.rs - Plan: plans/0X-phase.md:LineNumber - Impact: [Description] - Effort: [Estimate]
Output Format
markdown
# Plan Gap Analysis Report **Total Requirements**: X **Implemented**: Y (Z%) **Gaps Identified**: N ## By Phase - Phase 1: X/Y complete - Phase 2: X/Y complete - ... ## Critical Gaps 1. [Gap] - Priority, Effort
Best Practices
✓ Be systematic: Check every requirement ✓ Be specific: Reference exact file locations ✓ Be accurate: Verify, don't assume ✓ Be prioritized: Critical > High > Medium > Low ✓ Be actionable: Include file paths and estimates