Philosophy of Science Skill
Master the philosophical foundations of science: What is scientific method? What is explanation? Are scientific theories true?
Core Questions
| Question | Issue |
|---|---|
| What distinguishes science from non-science? | Demarcation |
| How do we confirm theories? | Confirmation |
| What is scientific explanation? | Explanation |
| Are theories true or useful fictions? | Realism |
| How does science change? | Theory change |
Scientific Method
The Problem of Induction
Hume's Problem: How do we justify inductive inference?
- •Past regularities don't logically guarantee future ones
- •Cannot use induction to justify induction (circular)
- •Yet science relies on induction
Falsificationism (Popper)
code
POPPER'S FALSIFICATIONISM ═════════════════════════ DEMARCATION CRITERION ├── Science: Falsifiable claims ├── Pseudo-science: Unfalsifiable └── Examples: Astrology, Freud (unfalsifiable) METHOD ├── Bold conjectures ├── Severe tests ├── Refutation → new conjecture └── Corroboration ≠ confirmation KEY IDEA: We never confirm theories We only fail to falsify them Asymmetry: One counterexample refutes
Problems:
- •Theories rarely abandoned on single refutation
- •Auxiliary hypotheses can absorb refutation
- •No purely observational test
Paradigms (Kuhn)
code
KUHN'S STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS ══════════════════════════════════════════ NORMAL SCIENCE ├── Work within paradigm ├── Puzzle-solving ├── Anomalies accumulate └── Paradigm defines problems, methods CRISIS ├── Too many anomalies ├── Alternative paradigms emerge ├── Debate between paradigms └── Incommensurability SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION ├── Paradigm shift ├── Not cumulative progress ├── New worldview └── Gestalt switch EXAMPLES: ├── Ptolemy → Copernicus ├── Newton → Einstein └── Phlogiston → Oxygen
Scientific Explanation
Deductive-Nomological (D-N) Model
code
D-N MODEL (Hempel) ══════════════════ EXPLANATION STRUCTURE: L₁, L₂, ... Lₙ (Laws) C₁, C₂, ... Cₙ (Conditions) ───────────────── E (Explanandum) REQUIREMENTS: ├── Deductively valid ├── Laws are essential ├── Empirically testable └── True premises EXAMPLE: All metals expand when heated. This is metal. This was heated. ∴ This expanded.
Problems:
- •Symmetry problem (flagpole and shadow)
- •Irrelevance problem
- •Statistical explanation
Causal-Mechanical Model
- •Explanation = tracing causal mechanism
- •Not just subsumption under laws
- •Mechanisms explain, not just correlate
Unificationism
- •Explanation = unifying diverse phenomena
- •Fewer patterns explaining more
- •Newton unified celestial and terrestrial motion
Scientific Realism
The Debate
Scientific Realism:
- •Mature scientific theories are approximately true
- •Theoretical entities (electrons, genes) exist
- •Science aims at truth
Anti-Realism (Instrumentalism):
- •Theories are useful tools
- •Theoretical terms don't refer
- •Science aims at empirical adequacy
Arguments for Realism
No Miracles Argument:
- •Science's success would be miraculous if theories weren't true
- •Best explanation of predictive success is truth
- •"The only philosophy that doesn't make science a miracle"
Arguments Against Realism
Pessimistic Meta-Induction:
- •Past "successful" theories were false
- •Caloric, phlogiston, ether
- •Current theories probably also false
Underdetermination:
- •Multiple theories compatible with same evidence
- •Evidence doesn't uniquely determine theory
- •Why think ours is true?
Structural Realism
Epistemic: We can know structure, not nature Ontic: Structure is all there is
Reduction and Emergence
Reductionism
- •Higher-level sciences reducible to lower
- •Biology → Chemistry → Physics
- •Unity of science thesis
Emergence
- •Some properties not reducible
- •Whole greater than parts
- •Consciousness? Life?
Multiple Realizability
- •Same higher-level state, different lower-level realizations
- •Pain in humans ≠ pain in octopi (neurally)
- •Blocks type-identity reduction
Key Debates
Demarcation
- •What makes something science?
- •Falsifiability? Paradigms? Method?
- •Is demarcation possible?
Theory Choice
- •Empirical adequacy
- •Simplicity, parsimony
- •Explanatory power
- •Fruitfulness
Values in Science
- •Value-free ideal achievable?
- •Social influences on science
- •Science studies, feminist philosophy of science
Key Vocabulary
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Falsification | Disproving through counterevidence |
| Paradigm | Shared framework for research |
| Incommensurability | Paradigms can't be compared |
| Confirmation | Evidence supporting theory |
| Underdetermination | Evidence doesn't determine theory |
| Instrumentalism | Theories are tools, not truths |
| Reduction | Higher explained by lower |
| Emergence | Irreducible higher-level properties |
| Demarcation | Distinguishing science from non-science |
| Corroboration | Surviving falsification attempts |
Integration with Repository
Related Themes
- •
thoughts/knowledge/: Scientific knowledge - •
thoughts/consciousness/: Neuroscience methodology