Verify that the streaming bug fix is correctly implemented:
Checks to Perform
1. Check Macro Expansion in DevCommand.swift
Verify observe method generation (around lines 789-804):
bash
grep -A 20 "public func observe" /Users/bri/dev/Trebuchet/Sources/TrebuchetCLI/Commands/DevCommand.swift | head -30
Expected: No nonisolated keyword, direct actor property access
2. Check Streaming Handler Generation
Verify handlers use await (around lines 506-530):
bash
grep -A 5 "let stream = await" /Users/bri/dev/Trebuchet/Sources/TrebuchetCLI/Commands/DevCommand.swift
Expected: let stream = await typedActor.observeXxx()
3. Check for Task.detached Anti-pattern
bash
grep -r "Task.detached" /Users/bri/dev/Trebuchet/Sources/TrebuchetCLI/Commands/DevCommand.swift
Expected: No matches (this was the buggy pattern)
4. Check Generated Code (if Aura .trebuchet exists)
bash
if [ -d /Users/bri/dev/Aura/.trebuchet ]; then echo "Checking generated code..." grep -r "nonisolated.*observe" /Users/bri/dev/Aura/.trebuchet/Sources/ 2>/dev/null || echo "✓ No nonisolated observe methods" grep -r "Task.detached" /Users/bri/dev/Aura/.trebuchet/Sources/ 2>/dev/null || echo "✓ No Task.detached found" fi
Report Results
For each check, report:
- •✅ Pass or ❌ Fail
- •Show relevant code snippets
- •Explain what the fix solves
What This Fix Solves
The streaming bug was caused by:
- •
Task.detachedspawned on global executor, not actor executor - •Observe method accessed actor state from detached task (race condition)
- •Continuation registered after first value might yield
- •Result: Stream terminated immediately, no data received
The fix:
- •Observe methods are actor-isolated (no
nonisolated) - •Direct access to actor state in actor's isolation domain
- •No race conditions
- •Stream properly yields initial value and updates