/build [path|description] [--rollback] [--dry-run]

Build a new feature using the full quality pipeline.

No arguments? Describe this skill and stop. Do not execute.

What Is This?

/build runs 8 phases in sequence:

1. •plan — Plan the feature
2. •structure — Map architecture, design types
3. •implementation — Write the code
4. •refactoring — Refine structurally
5. •deduplication — Remove duplicates
6. •review — Parallel scans, dedupe findings, fix
7. •testing — Write and run tests
8. •evaluation — Final review, write lessons

[rollback] → Phase 1:plan → [approval] → Phase 2:structure
  → Phase 3:implementation [loop if partial]
  → [quality-gate]
  → Phase 4:refactoring → Phase 5:deduplication
  → Phase 6:review (parallel scans → dedupe → fix)
  → Phase 7:testing → Phase 8:evaluation
  → [quality-gate]
  → [lessons written]

When to Use

• •New feature from PRD, new component, new module

Don't use for: Improving existing code → /improve | Simple changes → /quick-change

Flags

Phase Table

Orchestrator Rules

1. •NEVER do phase work yourself — you are a sequencer, not an implementer
2. •NEVER skip a phase — every phase runs in order
3. •NEVER proceed without gate marker — the subagent result must contain the marker string
4. •ALWAYS present Phase 1 plan to user for approval before continuing
5. •ALWAYS create rollback point first before any phase runs
6. •ALWAYS record metrics after each phase completes

Rollback

If --rollback flag is set:

git stash list | grep "build:" | head -1
# Extract stash ref and pop it
git stash pop <ref>

Then stop.

Dry Run

If --dry-run, print the phase table and stop.

Execution

Step 0: Rollback Point

git stash push -m "build:$(basename {TARGET}):$(date +%s)"

Report the stash ref to the user.

Step 1: Phases 1-3 (Plan + Structure + Implementation)

For each phase, spawn a single Task subagent (subagent_type: "general-purpose") with the model from the Phase Table.

Phase 1-2 prompt:

Read the skill file at .claude/phases/{SKILL_NAME}/SKILL.md
and execute ALL of its instructions against: {TARGET}

Follow every step in the skill. Do not skip any steps.
When complete, end your final message with the marker: {GATE_MARKER}

After Phase 1: Read the plan file. Present the summary to the user. Ask for approval (Approve / Reject / Revise). Do not proceed until approved.

Phase 3 prompt (implementation):

Read the skill file at .claude/phases/implementation/SKILL.md
and execute ALL of its instructions against: {TARGET}

IMPORTANT: Follow the compile loop. For each unit: refresh the relevant
canon principle, write the code, then compile-check before starting the
next unit. Do not write all code first and check later.

QUALITY GATE RULES — the gate runs immediately after this phase.
Every violation below causes a pipeline failure and a retry. Write code
that passes on the first attempt:

  SECURITY (instant fail):
  - No hardcoded secrets (API keys, passwords, tokens, private keys)
  - No exec()/execSync() with template literals — use spawn() with args
  - No path.join/resolve with user input without traversal validation
  - No eval(), innerHTML assignment, or document.write()

  NAMING:
  - No parameters named: data, info, result, item, obj, val, tmp, temp, ret, res
  - No single-letter parameters (except _, i, j, k, e)
  - No exported functions shorter than 4 characters
  - No files named: utils.ts, helpers.ts, misc.ts, common.ts, shared.ts
  - No abbreviations in exports: mgr, impl, proc, svc, repo

  SIZE LIMITS:
  - Functions: max 30 significant lines
  - Files: max 300 lines
  - Parameters per function: max 4
  - Exports per file: max 10 (index.ts exempt)
  - Project imports per file: max 8
  - Class methods: max 10
  - Inheritance depth: max 2

  CODE QUALITY:
  - No magic numbers (except -1, 0, 1, 2) — extract to named constants
  - No magic strings in conditionals — extract to constants
  - No circular imports
  - No console.error(err) — use err.message
  - No existsSync() then readFileSync() on same path — use try/catch
  - No readFileSync() right after writeFileSync() on same path
  - No truthy check on optional numbers (0 is falsy) — use !== undefined
  - No JSDoc that restates the function name
  - Types/interfaces must appear before functions in each file
  - No empty catch/except/rescue blocks
  - Max 3 TODO/FIXME/HACK markers per file
  - No http:// URLs (except localhost) — use https://
  - No hardcoded IP:port values — use config/env vars

Follow every step in the skill. Do not skip any steps.
When complete, end your final message with the marker: IMPLEMENTATION_COMPLETE

Phase 3 completion loop: If output contains IMPLEMENTATION_PARTIAL, re-run targeting only remaining items. Max 5 iterations. If items remain after 5, report to user and ask whether to continue or halt.

Step 2: Quality Gate (after Phase 3)

Run via Bash (no subagent):

tsx scripts/quality-gate.ts {TARGET}

If non-zero, pass error output to Phase 3 for correction (max 2 retries).

Step 3: Phases 4-5 (Refine)

Phase 4-5 prompt:

Read the skill file at .claude/phases/{SKILL_NAME}/SKILL.md
and execute ALL of its instructions against: {TARGET}

Follow every step in the skill. Do not skip any steps.
When complete, end your final message with the marker: {GATE_MARKER}

Step 4: Phase 6 (Review)

All reviewers see the same code state. One fix pass at the end.

4a. Parallel scans — spawn 4 Task agents simultaneously:

• •

  Agent A (gemini-scan): model: sonnet

  code

  Read the skill at workflow-skills/utils/gemini-scan/SKILL.md.
  Execute against: {TARGET}
  
  Run Gemini TWICE:
  1. focus: "general" — code quality, architecture, AI smells
  2. focus: "security" — think like an attacker, find vulnerabilities
  
  Combine findings from both passes. Output all findings as:
  [file:line] — description (severity)
  
  End with: GEMINI_SCAN_DONE
  

• •

  Agent B (codex-scan): model: sonnet

  code

  Read the skill at workflow-skills/utils/codex-scan/SKILL.md.
  Execute against: {TARGET}
  
  Output all findings as:
  [file:line] — description (category)
  
  End with: CODEX_SCAN_DONE
  

• •

  Agent C (qodana-scan): model: haiku

  code

  Read the skill at workflow-skills/utils/qodana-scan/SKILL.md.
  Execute against: {TARGET}
  
  Output all findings as:
  [file:line] — description (severity)
  
  End with: QODANA_SCAN_DONE
  

• •

  Agent D (ai-smell-scan): model: haiku

  code

  Read the skill at workflow-skills/utils/ai-smell-scan/SKILL.md.
  Execute against: {TARGET}
  
  Output all findings as:
  [file:line] [smell type]: description
  
  End with: AI_SMELL_SCAN_DONE
  

4b. Deduplicate findings — the orchestrator (not an agent) parses all 4 scan outputs:

• •Extract [file:line] description from each
• •Same file + line within 5 lines + similar description = one finding
• •Keep the most specific description

4c. Fix — if findings exist, spawn 1 fix agent (model: sonnet):

Fix these review findings in {TARGET}:

{DEDUPED_FINDINGS_LIST}

SCOPE CONSTRAINT: Only modify code directly related to findings.
Do not refactor, rename, or restructure code that was not flagged.

COMPLEXITY BUDGET: Do not increase overall complexity. Net-zero or
net-negative lines/functions/types.
EXCEPTION: Security fixes are exempt.

NO SILENT FAILURES: Do not change a throw/crash to a log-and-continue.

Apply each fix. Run tests after.
When complete, end with: REVIEW_COMPLETE

If no findings from any scan, skip the fix agent and emit REVIEW_COMPLETE.

Step 5: Phases 7-8 (Verify)

Do NOT start Phase 7 until Phase 6 (review) has returned REVIEW_COMPLETE. The review fix agent modifies code — testing against stale code produces false results.

Phase 7 (testing) prompt:

Read the skill file at .claude/phases/testing/SKILL.md
and execute ALL of its instructions against: {TARGET}

Follow every step in the skill. Do not skip any steps.
When complete, end your final message with the marker: TESTING_COMPLETE

Phase 8 (evaluation) — orchestrator-owned:

The orchestrator owns scoring and fix coordination. Scoring runs via Bash — never delegated to an agent.

Prepare: Read .claude/phases/evaluation/SKILL.md for the scorecard prompt, rescore prompt, classification tree, and report template. Load rubrics per its Rubric Loading section. Build {SCORECARD_PROMPT} by inserting {RUBRIC_CRITERIA} into the scorecard template.

8a. Score via Bash (no agent):

which codex 2>/dev/null && echo "CODEX_AVAILABLE" || echo "CODEX_UNAVAILABLE"

If CODEX_UNAVAILABLE: skip evaluation, note in report, continue to Step 6. Otherwise:

rm -f /tmp/lens-eval-scores.md
{SCORECARD_PROMPT}
cat /tmp/lens-eval-scores.md

8b. Orchestrator parses output — extract ISSUE: lines and the SCORE: NN/100 line. Save as {INITIAL_SCORE} and {ISSUES_LIST}.

8c–8d. Fix→Rescore loop (max 3 iterations):

Set {CURRENT_SCORE} = {INITIAL_SCORE}, {CURRENT_ISSUES} = {ISSUES_LIST}, {ALL_FIX_APPLIED} = empty.

For each iteration (while {CURRENT_ISSUES} is non-empty AND iteration <= 3):

8c. Fix all issues — spawn FIX agent (subagent_type: "general-purpose", model: sonnet):

Fix ALL of these issues in {TARGET}:

{CURRENT_ISSUES}

For each fix, print: FIX_APPLIED: {file:line} | {what changed}

After all fixes: npm test

PROHIBITED: committing, re-scoring, modifying code not cited in the issues
End with: FIX_COMPLETE

8d. Rescore via Bash — collect FIX_APPLIED lines from fix agent, append to {ALL_FIX_APPLIED}. Build {RESCORE_PROMPT} using the Rescore Prompt template, injecting {CURRENT_SCORE} and the new FIX_APPLIED lines:

rm -f /tmp/lens-eval-scores.md
{RESCORE_PROMPT}
cat /tmp/lens-eval-scores.md
rm -f /tmp/lens-eval-scores.md

Parse SCORE: NN/100 → update {CURRENT_SCORE}. Parse remaining ISSUE: lines → update {CURRENT_ISSUES}.

Exit loop if: no remaining issues, OR score did not improve from previous iteration, OR iteration limit reached.

End of loop. Set {FINAL_SCORE} = {CURRENT_SCORE}, {REMAINING_ISSUES} = {CURRENT_ISSUES}.

8e. Lessons — spawn LESSON agent (subagent_type: "general-purpose", model: sonnet):

Classify fixes and write evaluation outputs. Do NOT modify source code.

Initial score: {INITIAL_SCORE}/100
Final score: {FINAL_SCORE}/100
Issues found: {ISSUES_LIST}
Fixes applied: {ALL FIX_APPLIED LINES}
Remaining issues: {REMAINING_ISSUES}

Classify each fix using this tree:
- Code pattern to avoid? YES + general → LESSON in both .claude/lessons.md and .claude/universal-lessons.md
- Code pattern to avoid? YES + project-specific → LESSON in .claude/lessons.md only
- Suggests pipeline/tool change? → PROPOSAL in .claude/eval-proposals.md
- Neither → eval-report.md only

Category: LOGIC | DESIGN | CODE_QUALITY | DUPLICATION | AI_SMELL

Read .claude/lessons.md and .claude/universal-lessons.md — skip duplicates.
Write .claude/eval-report.md (replace file using template from
.claude/phases/evaluation/SKILL.md Report Template section).
Append to lessons + proposals.
Verify writes by reading each file.

End with: LESSONS_COMPLETE

The orchestrator checks for FIX_COMPLETE and LESSONS_COMPLETE markers. After the lesson agent completes, emit EVALUATION_COMPLETE.

Step 6: Quality Gate (final)

npm test && tsx scripts/quality-gate.ts {TARGET}

If non-zero, pass error to Phase 7 (testing) for correction (max 2 retries). After Phase 7 fixes and gate passes, do NOT re-run Phase 8.

Step 7: Report

Build: {TARGET}
  Rollback: stash@{N}

  ✓ Design    plan approved
  ✓ Build     implemented, gate passed
  ✓ Refine    refactored + deduped
  ✓ Review    4 scans, {N} findings fixed
  ✓ Verify    {N} tests, 0 failures
  ✓ Evaluate  {initial}/100 → {final}/100, lessons written

Rollback: /build --rollback

Gate Check

After each subagent completes, check that its result contains the gate marker string.

• •Passes: Report phase completion, proceed.
• •Fails: Retry (same prompt) up to 3 times. If still failing, halt and report.

6 Mechanisms