AgentSkillsCN

Legal Consistency

法律一致性

SKILL.md

L09: LEGAL CONSISTENCY CHECKER

Purpose

Cross-checks all legal outputs for internal consistency. Ensures timeline, evidence map, and claims matrix don't contradict each other. Identifies gaps and logical errors.

Triggers

  • All legal outputs completed (timeline, evidence, claims, strategy)
  • [LEGAL_RUN] command (Phase 7)
  • Before any legal export

Inputs

  • legal/timeline/TIMELINE.md
  • legal/evidence/EVIDENCE_MAP.md
  • legal/claims/CLAIM_MATRIX.md
  • legal/strategy/ (all strategy documents)
  • legal/drafts/ (all draft documents)

Output

legal/memos/CONSISTENCY_REPORT.md

Playbook

  1. Timeline ↔ Evidence Cross-Check:
    • Does every timeline event have supporting evidence?
    • Does every evidence exhibit appear in the timeline?
    • Are dates consistent across both documents?
  2. Claims ↔ Evidence Cross-Check:
    • Does every claim have at least one supporting exhibit?
    • Are there exhibits not linked to any claim? (potential missed arguments)
  3. Internal Logic Check:
    • Any contradictions between documents?
    • Any dates that don't add up?
    • Any actors named differently in different documents?
  4. Completeness Check:
    • Missing evidence flagged?
    • All claims have risk assessments?
    • Strategy covers all high-risk claims?
  5. Gap List: Prioritized list of what's missing
markdown
## CONSISTENCY FINDINGS

### Contradictions Found
| Issue | Document A | Document B | Severity |
|-------|-----------|-----------|----------|
| Date mismatch | TIMELINE: 2024-01-15 | EX-001: 2024-01-16 | Medium |

### Gaps Found
| Gap | Impact | Recommended Action |
|-----|--------|--------------------|
| No evidence for C-03 | Claim unsupported | Request payment records |

### Cross-Reference Verification
- Timeline events with evidence: 15/18 (83%) — 3 events lack documentation
- Claims with evidence: 4/5 (80%) — C-03 unsupported
- Exhibits linked to claims: 12/14 (86%) — EX-006, EX-011 unlinked

Quality Checks

  • Must check ALL documents, not just a sample
  • Contradictions must be classified by severity (Critical / Medium / Low)
  • Every gap must have a recommended action
  • Report must include pass/fail summary