Table of Contents
- •Quick Start
- •When to Use
- •Analysis Dimensions
- •Progressive Loading
- •Required TodoWrite Items
- •Workflow
- •Tiered Analysis
- •Cross-Plugin Dependencies
Code Refinement Workflow
Analyze and improve living code quality across six dimensions.
Quick Start
bash
/refine-code /refine-code --level 2 --focus duplication /refine-code --level 3 --report refinement-plan.md
When To Use
- •After rapid AI-assisted development sprints
- •Before major releases (quality gate)
- •When code "works but smells"
- •Refactoring existing modules for clarity
- •Reducing technical debt in living code
When NOT To Use
- •Removing dead/unused code (use conserve:bloat-detector)
- •Removing dead/unused code (use conserve:bloat-detector)
Analysis Dimensions
| # | Dimension | Module | What It Catches |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Duplication & Redundancy | duplication-analysis | Near-identical blocks, similar functions, copy-paste |
| 2 | Algorithmic Efficiency | algorithm-efficiency | O(n^2) where O(n) works, unnecessary iterations |
| 3 | Clean Code Violations | clean-code-checks | Long methods, deep nesting, poor naming, magic values |
| 4 | Architectural Fit | architectural-fit | Paradigm mismatches, coupling violations, leaky abstractions |
| 5 | Anti-Slop Patterns | clean-code-checks | Premature abstraction, enterprise cosplay, hollow patterns |
| 6 | Error Handling | clean-code-checks | Bare excepts, swallowed errors, happy-path-only |
Progressive Loading
Load modules based on refinement focus:
- •
modules/duplication-analysis.md(~400 tokens): Duplication detection and consolidation - •
modules/algorithm-efficiency.md(~400 tokens): Complexity analysis and optimization - •
modules/clean-code-checks.md(~450 tokens): Clean code, anti-slop, error handling - •
modules/architectural-fit.md(~400 tokens): Paradigm alignment and coupling
Load all for comprehensive refinement. For focused work, load only relevant modules.
Required TodoWrite Items
- •
refine:context-established— Scope, language, framework detection - •
refine:scan-complete— Findings across all dimensions - •
refine:prioritized— Findings ranked by impact and effort - •
refine:plan-generated— Concrete refactoring plan with before/after - •
refine:evidence-captured— Evidence appendix perimbue:evidence-logging
Workflow
Step 1: Establish Context (refine:context-established)
Detect project characteristics:
bash
# Language detection find . -name "*.py" -o -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.rs" -o -name "*.go" | head -20 # Framework detection ls package.json pyproject.toml Cargo.toml go.mod 2>/dev/null # Size assessment find . -name "*.py" -o -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.rs" | xargs wc -l 2>/dev/null | tail -1
Step 2: Dimensional Scan (refine:scan-complete)
Load relevant modules and execute analysis per tier level.
Step 3: Prioritize (refine:prioritized)
Rank findings by:
- •Impact: How much quality improves (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW)
- •Effort: Lines changed, files touched (SMALL/MEDIUM/LARGE)
- •Risk: Likelihood of introducing bugs (LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH)
Priority = HIGH impact + SMALL effort + LOW risk first.
Step 4: Generate Plan (refine:plan-generated)
For each finding, produce:
- •File path and line range
- •Current code snippet
- •Proposed improvement
- •Rationale (which principle/dimension)
- •Estimated effort
Step 5: Evidence Capture (refine:evidence-captured)
Document with imbue:evidence-logging (if available):
- •
[E1],[E2]references for each finding - •Metrics before/after where measurable
- •Principle violations cited
Fallback: If imbue is not installed, capture evidence inline in the report using the same [E1] reference format without TodoWrite integration.
Tiered Analysis
| Tier | Time | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| 1: Quick (default) | 2-5 min | Complexity hotspots, obvious duplication, naming, magic values |
| 2: Targeted | 10-20 min | Algorithm analysis, full duplication scan, architectural alignment |
| 3: Deep | 30-60 min | All above + cross-module coupling, paradigm fitness, comprehensive plan |
Cross-Plugin Dependencies
| Dependency | Required? | Fallback |
|---|---|---|
pensive:shared | Yes | Core review patterns |
imbue:evidence-logging | Optional | Inline evidence in report |
conserve:code-quality-principles | Optional | Built-in KISS/YAGNI/SOLID checks |
archetypes:architecture-paradigms | Optional | Principle-based checks only (no paradigm detection) |
When optional plugins are not installed, the skill degrades gracefully:
- •Without
imbue: Evidence captured inline, no TodoWrite proof-of-work - •Without
conserve: Uses built-in clean code checks (subset) - •Without
archetypes: Skips paradigm-specific alignment, uses coupling/cohesion principles only