AgentSkillsCN

proposal-writer

为科研资助、技术开发与创新项目撰写技术项目提案，或提案中的特定章节。当用户要求撰写、起草或创建项目提案、资助提案、科研提案、技术提案，或其中的任意部分（如摘要、目标、方法论、工作包、预算论证、影响说明、甘特图）时使用此功能。此外，当用户提及与提案相关的术语，如“交付成果”、“里程碑”、“工作计划”、“前沿技术”或“预期成果”时，此功能也会被触发。支持欧盟地平线计划、美国国家科学基金会、土耳其科学技术研究委员会、欧洲研究理事会，以及通用的提案格式。输出结果可通过docx或pdf技能完成。但不适用于市场研究报告或商业计划书。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: proposal-writer
description: "Write technical project proposals or specific sections of proposals for research grants, technology development, and innovation projects. Use when the user asks to write, draft, or create a project proposal, grant proposal, research proposal, technical proposal, or any section thereof (e.g., abstract, objectives, methodology, work packages, budget justification, impact statement, Gantt chart). Also triggers on requests mentioning proposal-related terms like 'deliverables', 'milestones', 'work plan', 'state of the art', or 'expected outcomes'. Supports EU Horizon, NSF, TUBITAK, ERC, and generic proposal formats. Outputs via docx or pdf skills. Does NOT handle market research reports or business plans."

Technical Project Proposal Writer

Write technical project proposals for research, technology development, and innovation funding calls. Produce either complete proposals or individual sections based on user request.

Workflow

1. Understand Scope

Determine what the user needs:

Full proposal? → Follow "Full Proposal Workflow" below Specific section(s)? → Follow "Section Workflow" below

Ask the user to clarify if ambiguous:

  • •Target funding body / call (e.g., Horizon Europe, NSF, TUBITAK, ERC, internal)
  • •Project topic and domain
  • •Consortium partners (if any)
  • •Duration and approximate budget
  • •Output format preference (docx or pdf) — default to docx

2. Research the Topic

Before writing, conduct complementary research to strengthen the proposal. Prioritize user-provided information, but augment with:

  • •State of the art: Search for recent publications from top venues (CVPR, ICCV, ECCV, ICRA, RSS, SIGGRAPH, ICML, ICLR, NeurIPS, etc.) using the citation-management skill
  • •Competing/related projects: Search for funded projects in the same domain
  • •Technology readiness: Identify TRL levels of relevant technologies
  • •Market context: Brief landscape if the call requires innovation/exploitation plans

Use web search and citation-management to gather reliable sources. Record key references for the bibliography.

3. Write Content

Follow the structure in references/proposal_structure.md for full proposals. For individual sections, use the appropriate section guidance from that reference.

Writing principles:

  • •Be specific and quantitative — avoid vague claims
  • •Ground claims in citations from reputable venues
  • •Use active voice and direct language
  • •Match the tone to the funding body (EU calls: formal and structured; NSF: narrative and compelling)
  • •Clearly distinguish what is novel from what is state of the art
  • •Every objective must map to measurable deliverables
  • •Include risk mitigation — do not present an overly optimistic picture

4. Generate Output

Use the docx skill (default) or pdf skill based on user preference to produce the final document.

Output location: data/output/ unless the user specifies otherwise.

Naming convention: proposal_<short_topic>_<section_or_full>_<YYYYMMDD>.docx

Example: proposal_robot_perception_full_20260216.docx

5. Self-Review Before Delivery

Before delivering the final output, perform a quick self-review using the checklist in references/review_checklist.md. Fix any issues found. For a deeper review, invoke the proposal-reviewer skill.

Full Proposal Workflow

  1. •Clarify scope, funding body, and format with the user
  2. •Research the topic (state of the art, related projects, key references)
  3. •Draft all sections per references/proposal_structure.md
  4. •Ensure consistency across sections (objectives ↔ work packages ↔ deliverables ↔ budget)
  5. •Run self-review checklist
  6. •Generate output document

Section Workflow

  1. •Identify which section(s) the user needs
  2. •Ask for any missing context required for that section
  3. •Research if the section demands it (e.g., state of the art, impact)
  4. •Draft the section(s)
  5. •Run relevant items from the review checklist
  6. •Generate output document

Integration with Other Skills

  • •docx: Primary output format for proposals
  • •pdf: Alternative output format
  • •citation-management: Find and validate references for state-of-the-art sections
  • •read-arxiv-paper: Deep-read specific papers for literature review
  • •proposal-reviewer: Post-writing review for overpromises and legal risk

Reference Files