AgentSkillsCN

mp-review-pr

通过信心评分进行多代理PR审查（支持草稿与只读模式）。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: mp-review-pr
description: Multi-agent PR review with confidence scoring (works on drafts, read-only)
disable-model-invocation: true
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Bash(git status *), Bash(git log *), Bash(git diff *), Bash(git show *), Bash(git branch --list *), Bash(git branch --show-current *), Bash(git branch -r *), Bash(git branch -a *), Bash(git rev-parse *), Bash(git merge-base *), Bash(gh pr list *), Bash(gh pr view *), Bash(gh pr diff *), Bash(gh pr status *), Bash(gh pr checks *), Bash(gh issue list *), Bash(gh issue view *), Bash(gh repo view *), Bash(gh run list *), Bash(gh run view *), Bash(gh search *)

PR Review

Perform a thorough multi-agent code review of the specified pull request. $ARGUMENTS

This review is READ-ONLY. It does NOT:

  • •Post comments to GitHub
  • •Modify any files
  • •Approve or request changes

Works on draft PRs - unlike built-in /code-review.

Usage

code
/mp-review-pr 123        # Review PR #123
/mp-review-pr            # Review PR for current branch

Phase 1: Fetch PR (Haiku Agent)

  1. •Get PR details: gh pr view $ARGUMENTS --json number,title,state,isDraft,baseRefName,headRefName,body,additions,deletions,changedFiles
  2. •Get the diff: gh pr diff $ARGUMENTS
  3. •List changed files: gh pr view $ARGUMENTS --json files --jq '.files[].path'
  4. •Do NOT skip if draft - review it anyway
  5. •Detect tech stack from changed files and repo structure
  6. •Find CLAUDE.md files

Phase 2: Parallel Review (5 Sonnet Agents)

Same as /mp-review-branch:

  • •Agent 1: Tech Stack Best Practices
  • •Agent 2: Security Review (OWASP)
  • •Agent 3: Performance Analysis
  • •Agent 4: Error Handling & Reliability
  • •Agent 5: Code Quality, CLAUDE.md & Overcomplicated Code

Phase 3: Confidence Scoring (Haiku Agents)

Score each issue 0-100:

  • •0-39 (Low): Stylistic, minor
  • •40-65 (Medium): Worth reviewing
  • •66-80 (High): Should address
  • •81-100 (Top): Must fix

Phase 4: Output

PR Review: #[number] - [title]

Status: [Ready/Draft] | Base: [base] → Head: [head] Tech Stack: [detected] Changes: +[additions] / -[deletions] in [changedFiles] files

Issues Summary Table

#IssueCategoryConfidenceLocation
1Issue nameCategoryScorefile:line

Top Priority (score > 80)

...

High Priority (score 66-80)

...

Medium Priority (score 40-65)

...

Low Priority (score < 40)

...

Summary

CategoryTopHighMediumLow
SecurityNNNN
PerformanceNNNN
Best PracticesNNNN
Error HandlingNNNN
Code QualityNNNN

Overall Risk: [Low/Medium/High/Critical] Ready to Merge: [Yes/No - reasons]

Note: This review is read-only. To apply fixes or post comments to GitHub, use separate commands.