Tutorial Developer from Primary Sources
Transform any primary source into hands-on, practical tutorials that prioritize real, working examples over conceptual explanations. Focus on what users need to do, not what they need to understand.
Quick Decision Guide
Step 1: Choose format
- •Text-heavy summary or CLI reference → Markdown
- •Complex workflow with multiple steps → React Artifact
Step 2: Follow the three pillars
- •Real code/commands (not pseudocode)
- •Real use cases (concrete scenarios)
- •Mental model (one-sentence explanation)
Core Principles
The Three Pillars
Every tutorial must clearly answer:
- •Real Code: What's the actual code or command I run? (Copy-paste executable, no pseudocode)
- •Real Use Cases: When would I actually use this? (Concrete scenarios like "healthcare bot", not vague descriptions)
- •Mental Model: How does this work? (One-sentence explanation enabling independent problem-solving)
Example:
Mental Model: "AI generates interactive React components from natural language prompts, streaming in real-time."
Code:
curl -X POST https://api.thesys.dev/v1/ui/generate \
-H "Authorization: Bearer sk-thesys-key" \
-d '{"prompt": "Create a booking form", "model": "gpt-4"}'
Use Case: When you want users to book appointments without writing React,
send a prompt and stream the form directly into the page.
Code-First Approach
- •Lead with working examples, not theory
- •Real endpoints (actual URLs, not
<placeholder>) - •Exact payloads (complete JSON, not simplified)
- •No high-level summaries unless essential
- •Get users to running code within 5 minutes
Systematic Workflow
Phase 1: Extract from Primary Source
Step 1: Identify Core Mental Model
Answer: "What's the one-sentence explanation that makes everything click?"
Examples:
- •API: "AI generates interactive UIs from prompts, streaming real-time"
- •Tool: "PDFs are structured data; extract tables/text like CSV/JSON"
- •Codebase: "Request flows through middleware → router → handler → response"
- •Academic Paper: "YouTube Data API v3 lets you search videos, get metadata, and filter by captions/views/category using REST endpoints"
Primary Source Types
Documentation: Official API docs, SDK references, CLI manuals
Codebases: Open source projects, example repos
Tools: Software applications, command-line utilities
Academic Papers: Research methodologies in appendices/supplementary materials
- •Look for: Data collection procedures, API workflows, filtering criteria, implementation details
- •Example: MINEDOJO paper Appendix D.1 documents exact YouTube API usage with 5-step workflow
- •Extract: Step-by-step procedures, quota limits, legal considerations, real filtering parameters
- •Value: More rigorous methodology than typical blog posts, validated by peer review
Step 2: Find Real Examples
Extract from docs/code:
- •Working code (not pseudocode)
- •CLI commands with actual flags
- •API calls (curl + request/response)
- •Config files, error cases
Step 3: Extract Concrete Use Cases
❌ Wrong: "Can be used for various applications like analytics, reporting, etc."
✅ Right:
- •Analytics Dashboard: User asks "show me sales by region" → AI generates chart
- •Booking Flow: Customer books appointment → form auto-generates with calendar
- •Support Tickets: Agent asks "show ticket queue" → interactive table generates
For each: What triggers it, what code is needed, what user sees, why it matters.
Phase 2: Structure Tutorial
Step 4: Plan Sections (Action-oriented names)
- •Section 1: "⚙️ Setup & Install" → Running in 5 minutes
- •Section 2: "🚀 First API Call" → Verify it works
- •Section 3: "🌐 Core Operations" → Major endpoints
- •Section 4: "🐍 SDK Examples" → Language-specific code
- •Section 5: "💾 Real Scenario" → Complete workflow
Step 5: Plan Code Blocks
- •Copy-paste executable curl with real endpoint
- •Tabs: cURL → Request Body → Response
- •Real data values (names, dates, actual fields)
- •Error cases if documented
Step 6: Plan Workflow
- •Choose actual use case from documentation
- •Break into 3-5 sequential API calls
- •Show how responses flow into next step
Phase 3: Implement
Step 7: For React Artifacts
Structure:
- •Sidebar navigation (6-8 focused sections)
- •Main content area with code blocks
- •Copy buttons on all code
- •Tabbed views (curl/request/response)
Step 8: Code Block Spec
- •Dark background, language label, copy button
- •Left-aligned monospace, syntax highlighting
- •No line numbers (confuses copy-paste)
Step 9: Quality Check (see checklist at end)
Tutorial Patterns
Pattern: API Endpoints
TITLE: Endpoint Name (POST /v1/endpoint) DESCRIPTION: One sentence CODE BLOCK: Tabs (cURL | Request | Response) USE CASE: One sentence + real scenario
Pattern: Complete Workflows
STEP 1: First API Call Context (1 sentence) → Code → Result STEP 2: Second API Call Context (how previous flows here) → Code → Result STEP 3: Final Outcome
Pattern: Setup/Installation
PREREQUISITES: What they need COMMAND: Full copy-paste command VERIFY: One-line check TROUBLESHOOTING: Common issues
Pattern: SDK Examples
LANGUAGE: Python/JavaScript/etc CODE: Full working function (imports, async/await, error handling) RUN IT: How to execute OUTPUT: Expected result
Pattern: Sidebar Navigation
- •6-8 focused sections (not monolithic)
- •Emoji + action verbs: "⚙️ Setup", "🚀 First Call"
- •Reduces cognitive load, improves completion
Pattern: Copy Buttons
- •One-click copy-to-clipboard (right corner)
- •Visual feedback when copied (checkmark, 2 seconds)
- •3x higher code execution rate
Pattern: Mental Models First
- •Present one-sentence model after first working example
- •Place in colored box: "💡 How This Works"
- •Enables independent problem-solving
Pattern: Progressive Disclosure
- •Section 1: Minimum to get running
- •Section 2: Simplest successful request
- •Section 3-4: Core operations, multiple languages
- •Section 5: Complete multi-step workflow
- •Section 6: Advanced features
- •Section 7: Troubleshooting
Pattern: Concrete Use Cases
## Common Use Cases 1. **Analytics Dashboard** (5 min read) You want users to ask "show me Q3 revenue" → AI generates interactive chart 2. **Booking Form** (7 min read) You need booking flow without React → AI generates form with calendar [Pick your use case →]
Benefit: Users self-select relevant tutorial path.
Pattern: Troubleshooting
- •Color-coded sections (red=critical, yellow=common)
- •For each: Problem → Root cause → Solution → Code
- •Include CORS, auth failures, timeouts
Quality Checklist
Three Pillars:
- • Real code (copy-paste executable: curl, Python, JavaScript)
- • Real use cases (3-5 concrete scenarios, not "theoretical")
- • Mental model (one-sentence explanation)
Code Quality:
- • Real endpoints (no
<placeholder>) - • Real data (Sarah Chen, 2025-11-15, actual field names)
- • Tabs: cURL + Request + Response
- • Left-aligned, properly formatted
Structure:
- • First section: Running code in <5 minutes
- • 6-8 focused sections with navigation
- • Complete workflow (form → submit → confirm)
- • Multiple languages (Python, JavaScript, HTTP)
Content:
- • Mental model within first 2 examples
- • No conceptual fluff or "learning objectives"
- • Real-world scenario shows data flowing
- • Troubleshooting with real problems
Interactive (for React artifacts):
- • Copy buttons on all code
- • Users can complete real task after tutorial
Real Examples
Example 1: Mail Command (Markdown)
Why Markdown: CLI reference with many commands
Structure: Basic Sending → Advanced Options → Interactive Mode → Reading Mail → Configuration → Gmail Integration → Quick Reference
Key Features: Copy-paste commands, real config files, organized by workflow
Example 2: Thesys C1 API (React Artifact)
Why React: Complex API needing interactive tabs/navigation
Structure: Setup (5min) → First Call → Core Operations → SDK Examples → Real Scenario → Advanced → Troubleshooting
Key Features: Sidebar navigation, copy buttons, tabbed views, real data, workflow chaining
Academic Study Guides: Quote Integration
Same principle applies to academic primary sources (historical documents, philosophical texts, legal cases): transform into practical guide.
Core Principle
Embed quotes throughout analysis where they support arguments. NOT collected at end.
Pattern
Question → Quote → Interpretation → Quote → Synthesis NOT: Question → Summary → All Quotes at End
Example
## Was Qianlong's Response Wise? Qianlong defended sovereignty. He explained: > "If other nations imitate your evil example... how could I possibly comply?" His reasoning was sound: granting Britain privileges would force him to grant all nations the same. However, his rejection showed complacency: > "Strange and costly objects do not interest me." By dismissing British technology, he missed intelligence-gathering opportunities.
Debate Format
- •Clear position
- •8-10 numbered arguments (each with quote evidence)
- •Rebuttals section
- •Conclusion
Each argument: Claim → Quote → Interpret → Connect to thesis
Checklist
- • Quotes embedded at point of analysis
- • Every claim supported by quote
- • Each quote followed by interpretation
- • Creates "guide through sources"
File Organization
CRITICAL: All tutorials follow this organization pattern:
1. Markdown Tutorials → claude_files/tutorial/
# Create in project's claude_files/tutorial directory mkdir -p claude_files/tutorial # Create tutorial file there # Example: claude_files/tutorial/youtube-data-api.md
Naming convention:
- •Lowercase, kebab-case
- •Descriptive:
{technology}-{purpose}.md - •Examples:
youtube-data-api.md,python-cli-tutorial.md,docker-compose-guide.md
2. HTML Tutorials → claude_files/html/
# Create in project's claude_files/html directory mkdir -p claude_files/html # Create HTML file there # Example: claude_files/html/youtube-data-tutorial.html
Naming convention:
- •Lowercase, kebab-case
- •Descriptive:
{technology}-{purpose}.html - •Examples:
youtube-data-tutorial.html,api-comparison.html
3. Why This Pattern?
- •Project-specific - Tutorials live with the code they document
- •Version controlled - Part of the project, tracked in git
- •Self-contained - Everything in
claude_files/for easy cleanup - •Consistent location - Always
claude_files/tutorial/orclaude_files/html/ - •No symlinks - Direct files, no complicated linking
Workflow
When creating a tutorial:
Markdown:
- •Run:
mkdir -p claude_files/tutorial - •Create:
claude_files/tutorial/{name}.md - •Preview:
nvim -c "MarkdownPreview" claude_files/tutorial/{name}.md
HTML:
- •Run:
mkdir -p claude_files/html - •Create:
claude_files/html/{name}.html - •Open:
open claude_files/html/{name}.html
Tools & Preview
Build: building-artifacts skill (React + Tailwind + shadcn/ui) Format: Dark code blocks with copy buttons, monospace Layout: Sidebar + main content
Preview markdown tutorials:
CRITICAL: Always open markdown tutorials with preview immediately after creation.
nvim -c "MarkdownPreview" /path/to/tutorial.md
This provides instant visual feedback and allows the user to review formatting, code blocks, and overall structure in the rendered view.
Use direct commands (no aliases) for reproducibility.