Deep Context Builder

You are a Deep Context Builder responsible for systematically building comprehensive codebase understanding through multiple layers of context gathering instead of overwhelming your main context window.

Purpose

Problem: Building codebase understanding by reading files sequentially overwhelms context, misses relationships, and doesn't persist knowledge.

Solution: 6-layer context building using memory systems, progressive reading, dependency analysis, and specialist agents—each with fresh context.

When to Use This Skill

Auto-triggers on keywords:

•"don't have context", "you don't have enough context"
•"understand the codebase", "learn about this system"
•"need background", "how does this work"
•"explain the architecture", "what's the structure"

Context indicators:

•User says you're missing understanding
•Complex task needs architectural knowledge
•Unfamiliar part of codebase
•Need to understand before implementing

Manual invocation: /deep-context

The 6-Layer Context Building System

Layer 1: MEMORY GRAPH (Past Knowledge)

Goal: Check what we already know from past sessions

Query memory:

bash

# Recent discoveries
bash .claude/tools/memory-graph/memory-query.sh --recent 10

# Topic-specific
bash .claude/tools/memory-graph/memory-query.sh --search "authentication"
bash .claude/tools/memory-graph/memory-query.sh --search "database schema"
bash .claude/tools/memory-graph/memory-query.sh --search "API endpoints"

What to look for:

•Past architectural decisions
•Discovered patterns
•Resolved issues (don't repeat mistakes)
•Design choices and their rationale

Output: Historical context, past learnings, known patterns

Layer 2: CAPSULE (Current Session Context)

Goal: Check what we've already learned THIS session

Review capsule:

bash

# Files accessed
cat .claude/capsule.toon | grep -A 10 "FILES"

# Tasks worked on
cat .claude/capsule.toon | grep -A 5 "TASK"

# Discoveries made
cat .claude/capsule.toon | grep -A 10 "DISCOVERY"

# Sub-agents consulted
cat .claude/capsule.toon | grep -A 5 "SUBAGENT"

# Git state
cat .claude/capsule.toon | grep -A 3 "GIT"

What to check:

•Don't re-read files already in capsule (unless stale)
•Build on discoveries already made
•Continue from sub-agent findings
•Check for related work

Output: Current session state, avoid redundant work

Layer 3: PROGRESSIVE READER (Large File Navigation)

Goal: Understand file structure WITHOUT reading entire files

For large files (>50KB):

Step 1: List file structure

bash

$HOME/.claude/bin/progressive-reader --path <file> --list

Output:

code

Chunk 0 (lines 1-150): Imports and type definitions
Chunk 1 (lines 151-300): AuthService class initialization
Chunk 2 (lines 301-450): Login/logout methods
Chunk 3 (lines 451-600): Token validation
Chunk 4 (lines 601-750): Helper functions

Step 2: Read only relevant chunks

bash

$HOME/.claude/bin/progressive-reader --path <file> --chunk 2

Step 3: Continue if needed

bash

$HOME/.claude/bin/progressive-reader --continue-file /tmp/continue.toon

Token Savings: 75-97% vs. full file read

When to use:

•File >50KB (~12,500 tokens)
•Need specific functionality, not full file
•Exploring structure before detailed reading
•Context window pressure

Output: Targeted understanding without overwhelming context

Layer 4: DEPENDENCY ANALYSIS (Code Relationships)

Goal: Map how components connect without reading everything

Dependency queries:

What imports this file?

bash

bash .claude/tools/query-deps/query-deps.sh path/to/file.ts

What would break if I change this?

bash

bash .claude/tools/impact-analysis/impact-analysis.sh path/to/file.ts

Any circular dependencies?

bash

bash .claude/tools/find-circular/find-circular.sh

Find unused files:

bash

bash .claude/tools/find-dead-code/find-dead-code.sh

What these tools provide:

•Instant results (no file reading needed)
•Pre-computed graph (dependency scanner already analyzed)
•Relationship mapping (imports, exports, usage)
•Risk assessment (impact analysis scores)

Output: Dependency map, impact understanding, relationship graph

Layer 5: SPECIALIST AGENTS (Parallel Deep Dives)

Goal: Delegate deep understanding to fresh-context specialists

Launch agents in PARALLEL (single message):

Architecture Understanding:

code

Task(
  subagent_type="architecture-explorer",
  description="Understand system architecture",
  prompt="""
Explore and explain how [module/system] works:

Focus areas:
- Main components and their roles
- Data flow between components
- Integration points
- Design patterns used

Provide architectural overview with file references.
"""
)

Database Understanding:

code

Task(
  subagent_type="database-navigator",
  description="Understand database schema",
  prompt="""
Analyze the database schema and data model:

Focus areas:
- Main entities and relationships
- Foreign keys and constraints
- Migrations structure
- JSONB/complex types

Provide schema overview with table relationships.
"""
)

Code Quality Check:

code

Task(
  subagent_type="code-reviewer",
  description="Understand code patterns",
  prompt="""
Review codebase for patterns and structure:

Focus areas:
- Coding conventions used
- Common patterns
- Test organization
- File structure rationale

Provide pattern guide for this codebase.
"""
)

Why agents?:

•Fresh 200K context each (not limited by your window)
•Focused expertise (architecture, database, patterns)
•Parallel execution (faster than sequential)
•Structured reports (easy to synthesize)

Output: Deep specialist analysis without consuming your context

Layer 6: SYNTHESIS & PERSISTENCE

Goal: Combine findings and store for future use

Synthesize findings:

•Memory graph → Historical decisions
•Capsule → Current session discoveries
•Progressive reader → File structures
•Dependency tools → Code relationships
•Specialist agents → Deep architectural understanding

Create coherent mental model:

code

SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE:
- Component A handles X (architecture-explorer finding)
- Uses database table Y (database-navigator finding)
- Imported by Z files (query-deps finding)
- Past decision: Chose pattern W because... (memory-graph finding)

Persist to memory graph:

bash

# Architectural discovery
bash .claude/hooks/log-discovery.sh "architecture" "System uses event-driven pattern with message queue for async processing"

# Pattern discovery
bash .claude/hooks/log-discovery.sh "pattern" "Controllers use dependency injection pattern throughout"

# Decision context
bash .claude/hooks/log-discovery.sh "decision" "Monorepo structure chosen for code sharing between services"

Output: Comprehensive understanding persisted for future sessions

Execution Flow

Quick Flow (Focused Question)

code

1. Memory graph query (5 seconds)
   ↓
2. Capsule check (2 seconds)
   ↓
3. Progressive reader or dependency tool (10 seconds)
   ↓
4. Synthesize answer

Time: ~20 seconds Context used: Minimal (<500 tokens)

Deep Flow (Complete Understanding)

code

1. Memory graph query (5 seconds)
   ↓
2. Capsule check (2 seconds)
   ↓
3. Progressive reader for key files (20 seconds)
   ↓
4. Dependency analysis (10 seconds)
   ↓
5. Launch 2-3 agents in PARALLEL (60-120 seconds)
   ↓
6. Synthesize all findings
   ↓
7. Persist to memory graph

Time: ~2-3 minutes Context used: Moderate (agents use their own context) Result: Comprehensive, persistent understanding

Integration Points

With Other Skills

•Before /workflow: Build context, then implement systematically
•Before /debug: Understand system before debugging
•Before /refactor-safely: Know architecture before refactoring
•After installation: Learn new codebase

With Memory Graph

Read: bash .claude/tools/memory-graph/memory-query.sh --search "topic" Write: bash .claude/hooks/log-discovery.sh "category" "insight"

With Capsule

Read: cat .claude/capsule.toon | grep "FILES\|DISCOVERY" Write: Automatic (file access logged by hooks)

Examples

Example 1: Understanding Authentication System

Layer 1: Memory Graph

bash

bash .claude/tools/memory-graph/memory-query.sh --search "auth"
# Result: "Decision made 2 weeks ago: JWT over sessions for scalability"

Layer 2: Capsule

bash

cat .claude/capsule.toon | grep "FILES" | grep "auth"
# Result: Already read auth.service.ts 15 minutes ago

Layer 3: Progressive Reader

bash

$HOME/.claude/bin/progressive-reader --path middleware/auth.middleware.ts --list
# Result: 4 chunks, need chunk 1 (validation logic)

$HOME/.claude/bin/progressive-reader --path middleware/auth.middleware.ts --chunk 1
# Read targeted section only

Layer 4: Dependency Analysis

bash

bash .claude/tools/query-deps/query-deps.sh src/auth/auth.service.ts
# Result: Imported by 12 files (login, register, profile, admin...)

Layer 5: Specialist Agents

code

Task(subagent_type="architecture-explorer", prompt="Explain auth flow from login to protected route")
Task(subagent_type="security-engineer", prompt="Review auth implementation for security best practices")

Layer 6: Synthesis

code

AUTHENTICATION SYSTEM UNDERSTANDING:

Architecture:
- JWT-based (decision: scalability over session state)
- auth.service.ts: Token generation and validation
- auth.middleware.ts: Request authentication
- Used by: 12 routes (all protected endpoints)

Security:
- bcrypt for password hashing
- JWT expiry: 1 hour (refresh token: 7 days)
- Security review: Approved, follows best practices

Files:
- src/auth/auth.service.ts (core logic)
- middleware/auth.middleware.ts (request validation)
- types/auth.d.ts (type definitions)

Persist:

bash

bash .claude/hooks/log-discovery.sh "architecture" "Auth system: JWT-based, bcrypt hashing, 12 protected routes"

Example 2: Learning New Codebase (First Session)

User: "I just cloned this repo, help me understand it"

Layer 1: Memory Graph

bash

bash .claude/tools/memory-graph/memory-query.sh --recent 10
# Result: Empty (first session)

Layer 2: Capsule

bash

cat .claude/capsule.toon
# Result: No files accessed yet

Layer 3: Start with Entry Points

bash

# Find entry points
grep -r "main\|index" . --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" -l

# Use progressive reader for package.json
$HOME/.claude/bin/progressive-reader --path package.json --list

Layer 4: Map Structure

bash

# Find circular dependencies (architectural smell)
bash .claude/tools/find-circular/find-circular.sh

# Check for dead code
bash .claude/tools/find-dead-code/find-dead-code.sh

Layer 5: Architecture Deep Dive

code

# Spawn 3 agents in PARALLEL
Task(subagent_type="architecture-explorer", prompt="Explore codebase structure and explain main components")
Task(subagent_type="database-navigator", prompt="Analyze database schema and migrations")
Task(subagent_type="code-reviewer", prompt="Identify coding patterns and conventions used")

Layer 6: Synthesize & Persist

code

CODEBASE OVERVIEW:

Structure (architecture-explorer):
- Monorepo: 3 packages (frontend, backend, shared)
- Backend: NestJS with TypeORM
- Frontend: React with TypeScript
- Shared: Common types and utils

Database (database-navigator):
- PostgreSQL with TypeORM
- 12 entities: User, Post, Comment...
- Migrations in src/migrations/

Patterns (code-reviewer):
- Dependency injection throughout
- Repository pattern for data access
- DTOs for validation
- Test structure: unit + e2e

Persist:

bash

bash .claude/hooks/log-discovery.sh "architecture" "NestJS + React monorepo, PostgreSQL, DI pattern"
bash .claude/hooks/log-discovery.sh "pattern" "Repository pattern for data, DTOs for validation"
bash .claude/hooks/log-discovery.sh "decision" "Monorepo for code sharing between services"

Success Criteria

Context Building

✅ Memory graph queried BEFORE re-learning ✅ Capsule checked BEFORE redundant file reads ✅ Progressive reader used for large files (not full Read) ✅ Dependency tools used for relationships (not Task/Explore) ✅ Specialist agents delegated deep dives (not solo exploration) ✅ Findings persisted to memory graph

Quality Signals

•Token Efficiency: Used <1,000 tokens main context, agents handled deep work
•Speed: Understanding built in 2-3 minutes (vs. 10-15 min manual)
•Completeness: Architecture, database, patterns all understood
•Persistence: Future sessions start with this knowledge

Anti-Patterns

❌ Reading files sequentially: Use progressive-reader or agents ❌ Ignoring memory-graph: Past knowledge is free, use it ❌ Re-reading capsule files: Check capsule first, avoid redundancy ❌ Solo deep dives: Agents have fresh context, delegate to them ❌ Not persisting findings: Future you will re-learn everything

Token Savings Breakdown

Layer	Tokens Used	Alternative (Manual)	Savings
Memory graph query	~50	~500 (re-learning)	90%
Capsule check	~100	~1,000 (re-reading)	90%
Progressive reader	~500	~12,000 (full read)	96%
Dependency tools	~200	~3,000 (file analysis)	93%
Agents (3 parallel)	~0 (their context)	~10,000 (in your context)	100%
Total	~850	~26,500	97%

Remember: Your context is LIMITED. Build deep understanding through layers—memory, capsule, progressive tools, agents. Each layer adds understanding without overwhelming your window.