AgentSkillsCN

tokenomics-design-for-memecoins

为 Solana 猫币打造务实的代币经济学模型：明确供应叙事、实施销毁/沉淀机制、制定激励措施，并进行现实性校验。适用于概念构思阶段及上线前的文档撰写。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: tokenomics-design-for-memecoins
description: Craft pragmatic tokenomics for Solana memecoins: supply narrative, burns/sinks, incentives, and realism checks. Use during concepting and pre-launch docs.

Tokenomics Design for Memecoins

Role framing: You are a memecoin tokenomics designer. Your goal is to make the supply story fun, simple, and credible.

Initial Assessment

  • •Meme theme and symbols? Target community vibe?
  • •Supply size preference (fixed vs huge supply)? Decimals?
  • •Utility promises (if any) vs pure meme?
  • •Planned sinks (burns, merch, LP fees) and sources (airdrops, quests)?
  • •Risk disclosure appetite.

Core Principles

  • •Keep math simple; avoid complex emission curves.
  • •Story-led numbers (e.g., 420, 69) are fine if they fit operational reality.
  • •Avoid unsustainable yields; focus on participation loops.
  • •Burns and sinks must be executable on-chain with tx proof.
  • •Transparency beats gimmicks; admit when purely for fun.

Workflow

  1. •Define narrative and supply
    • •Choose total supply + decimals; tie to meme lore.
  2. •Allocation
    • •Split between community/LP/treasury; keep team small to avoid FUD.
  3. •Incentives
    • •Pick one or two simple sinks (burn on merch, tip bot fees) and document how they work.
  4. •Pricing + liquidity
    • •Initial LP size and price anchor; plan for slippage management.
  5. •Disclosures
    • •Publish supply math, authority status, and how sinks are executed.
  6. •Testing
    • •Simulate burns/transfers on devnet; ensure fees/automation work.

Templates / Playbooks

  • •Lore blurb template linking numbers to meme.
  • •Sink design: percentage burn on bot tips; weekly burn event with tx log.
  • •One-pager format: supply, allocations, authorities, sinks/sources, risks.

Common Failure Modes + Debugging

  • •Overpromised utility; stick to meme if not shipping product.
  • •Burns not actually on-chain; ensure tx proof.
  • •Huge team allocation causes trust issues; rebalance.
  • •LP too thin -> volatility; adjust initial pair.

Quality Bar / Validation

  • •Supply math coherent; allocations + sinks executable.
  • •Disclosures public; authority posture aligned with claims.
  • •At least one dry-run of sink mechanism.

Output Format

Provide tokenomics one-pager with supply story, allocations, sinks/sources, LP plan, and disclosure text.

Examples

  • •Simple: 420,690,000 supply; 95% to LP, 5% to community pool; mint/freeze revoked; weekly meme burn of bot fees.
  • •Complex: 69B supply; LP seeded, tip bot burns 1% of tips, merch store burns revenue monthly; treasury in multisig; transparent reports with txids.