Claude Artifact Creator
Creates, improves, and maintains Claude Code extensions following official best practices.
FIRST: Read Meta-Knowledge
Before creating any artifact, READ .claude/GUIDELINES.md for:
- •Decision framework (Skill vs Agent vs Command vs Hook)
- •Tool permissions strategy by role
- •Hook events and configuration
- •Agent/Skill/Command file formats
- •Quality checklists and anti-patterns
This skill provides quick patterns; GUIDELINES.md provides authoritative rules.
When to Use This Skill
- •Creating a new skill for domain expertise or file processing
- •Creating an agent for specialized tasks with context isolation
- •Creating a command for user-invoked shortcuts
- •Improving or refactoring existing artifacts
- •Reviewing artifacts against quality standards
- •Analyzing staged changes for automation opportunities
- •Consolidating duplicate or overlapping artifacts
Core Principle: Concise is Key
The context window is a shared resource. Before adding content, ask:
- •"Does Claude really need this?" - Claude is already smart
- •"Can this be in a reference file?" - Progressive disclosure
- •"Does this justify its token cost?" - Every line has a cost
Core Capabilities
- •Create - Generate artifacts from templates with proper structure
- •Improve - Enhance based on official best practices and patterns
- •Review - Audit against quality checklist and anti-patterns
- •Consolidate - Merge duplicate artifacts into focused ones
Three-Layer Knowledge Architecture
CRITICAL: Before creating any knowledge artifact, determine the correct layer.
See GUIDELINES.md § Three-Layer Knowledge Architecture for full details.
Quick Decision Flow
Is it a design principle that applies to ANY language?
│
├── YES → Create CONCEPT (knowledge/concepts/)
│ NO CODE, just principles
│
└── NO → Is it specific to a language/framework?
│
├── YES → Create IMPLEMENTATION (knowledge/implementations/{lang}/)
│ CODE EXAMPLES, links to concept
│
└── NO → Create SKILL (skills/)
ORCHESTRATION, references both
Creating Concepts
Location: knowledge/concepts/{topic}/{concept}.md
Rules:
- •✅ Framework-independent principles only
- •✅ Why it matters (rationale)
- •✅ How to detect violations (criteria, not code)
- •❌ NO code examples
- •❌ NO language-specific syntax
Template:
---
name: {Concept Name}
category: {topic}
implementations:
dotnet: ../implementations/dotnet/{file}.md#{anchor}
react: ../implementations/react/{file}.md#{anchor}
used_by_skills: []
---
# {Concept Name}
> "{Quote or one-liner definition}"
## The Principle
{Framework-independent explanation}
## Why It Matters
{Business/technical rationale}
## How to Detect Violations
- {Detection criteria - NO code}
- {Observable symptoms}
## Related Concepts
- [{Related Concept}](../{related}/concept.md)
## Implementations
| Language | Guide |
|----------|-------|
| C#/.NET | [Link](../../implementations/dotnet/{file}.md) |
| React | [Link](../../implementations/react/{file}.md) |
Creating Implementations
Location: knowledge/implementations/{lang}/{file}.md
Rules:
- •✅ Links to concept(s) it implements
- •✅ ❌ Bad / ✅ Good code examples
- •✅ Framework-specific notes
- •❌ NO principle definitions (link instead)
- •❌ NO "why" explanations (concept layer)
Template:
---
implements_concepts:
- concepts/{topic}/{concept}
language: {csharp|typescript|python}
framework: [{dotnet|react|abp}]
---
# {Concept Name} in {Language}
## {Concept} {#anchor}
> **Concept**: [{Concept Name}](../../concepts/{topic}/{concept}.md)
### ❌ Violation
```{lang}
// Code showing anti-pattern
✅ Correct
// Code showing correct implementation
Framework-Specific Notes
{Any framework-specific considerations}
### Updating Skills for Three-Layer
When creating or updating skills, add these front matter fields:
```yaml
---
name: skill-name
applies_concepts:
- knowledge/concepts/{topic}/{concept}
uses_implementations:
- knowledge/implementations/{lang}/{file}
---
Governance Checklist
Before creating ANY knowledge artifact:
- • Concept exists? If creating implementation, verify concept exists first
- • No code in concept? Concepts must be code-free
- • Links bidirectional? Concept → Implementation, Implementation → Concept
- • INDEX updated? Add to
knowledge/concepts/INDEX.mdorknowledge/implementations/INDEX.md
Quick Start
Create a skill:
python scripts/init_skill.py pdf-processor --path .claude/skills --template tool
Create an agent:
python scripts/init_agent.py abp-code-reviewer --path .claude/agents --template reviewer --category reviewers
Create a command:
python scripts/init_command.py run-tests --path .claude/commands --template workflow --category tdd
Key Patterns
1. Decision Pattern
User triggers explicitly → COMMAND Claude auto-detects → SKILL (no isolation) or AGENT (with isolation) Deterministic on events → HOOK
2. Progressive Disclosure
Level 1: description (~100 tokens) → Trigger matching Level 2: SKILL.md body (<5k tokens) → When activated Level 3: references/ → On-demand deep dives
3. Artifact Limits
See GUIDELINES.md § Size Limits for authoritative limits.
Quick reference: Skills <500, Agents <150, References one level deep.
4. Description Pattern
# Good: Third-person with triggers description: Processes PDF files for text extraction and form filling. Use when working with PDFs, extracting text, or filling forms. # Bad: First-person or vague description: I can help you with documents
YAML Validation Rules
| Field | Requirements |
|---|---|
name | Max 64 chars, lowercase, hyphens only, no reserved words (anthropic, claude) |
description | Max 1024 chars, third-person voice, 3+ trigger scenarios, no XML tags |
tools | Comma-separated; omitting grants ALL tools (including MCP) |
model | haiku (fast), sonnet (balanced), opus (powerful) |
permissionMode | default, acceptEdits, bypassPermissions |
Decision Flowchart
See GUIDELINES.md § Choosing the Right Tool for the full decision matrix.
Quick reference: Command (user triggers) → Skill (auto, no isolation) → Agent (auto, isolated) → Hook (deterministic events)
Creation Workflow
Step 1: Identify Type
Type Decision Checklist: - [ ] User invokes with /command? → Command - [ ] Needs separate context window? → Agent - [ ] Auto-triggered domain knowledge? → Skill - [ ] Shell action on tool events? → Hook
Step 2: Gather Requirements
Skills: Trigger scenarios (3+), resources needed, primary workflow Agents: Team role, tools needed (least privilege), permission mode Commands: Arguments, phases, expected output
Step 3: Initialize
| Type | Command |
|---|---|
| Skill | python scripts/init_skill.py <name> --template <type> |
| Agent | python scripts/init_agent.py <name> --template <type> --category <cat> |
| Command | python scripts/init_command.py <name> --template <type> --category <cat> |
Templates:
- •Skills:
default,tool,workflow,domain,analysis,integration,generator,pattern - •Agents:
architect,reviewer,developer,coordinator,specialist - •Commands:
review,generate,debug,workflow,git,refactor
Step 4: Test
Testing Checklist: - [ ] Customize all placeholders ([DOMAIN], [TARGET]) - [ ] Test with Haiku - enough guidance? - [ ] Test with Sonnet - clear and efficient? - [ ] Test with Opus - not over-explained? - [ ] Verify triggers activate correctly
Built-in Subagents
Claude Code includes built-in agents (cannot be modified):
| Agent | Purpose | Mode |
|---|---|---|
| Plan | Research before presenting plan | Read-only, plan mode |
| Explore | Fast codebase search | Read-only (ls, find, cat, head, tail) |
Note: Subagents cannot spawn other subagents.
Tool Permissions & Hook Events
⚠️ Warning: Omitting tools grants ALL tools including MCP. Always whitelist explicitly.
Full reference: See GUIDELINES.md § Agents for tool permissions by role, and GUIDELINES.md § Hooks for hook events.
Best Practices
- •Concise over comprehensive - Claude is smart; add only what it doesn't know
- •Show, don't tell - Examples beat descriptions
- •Third-person descriptions - Required for system prompt injection
- •3+ trigger scenarios - Specific scenarios in description ensure activation
- •Least privilege tools - Only grant necessary tools
- •One level deep references - No nested references (causes partial reads)
- •Test all models - What works for Opus may need more detail for Haiku
- •Validate before shipping - Run
scripts/validate.py --strict
Common Pitfalls
| Pitfall | Detection | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Vague triggers | Description <100 chars | Add 3+ specific scenarios |
| Abstract only | No code blocks | Add before/after examples |
| Monolithic | >500 lines | Move to references/ |
| Kitchen sink | Lists 5+ domains | Create specialized artifacts |
| Embedded code in agent | Code blocks in agent | Extract to skill |
| First-person description | "I can help" | Use third-person |
See references/anti-patterns.md for comprehensive list.
Agent Refactoring
When agents grow >150 lines, extract embedded content to skills, commands, or docs.
Full guide: See agent-refactoring-guide.md
Agent Optimization Patterns
For comprehensive agent optimization, see agent-optimization-patterns.md.
Key techniques:
| Technique | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Semantic skill categorization | Organize skills by METHODOLOGY, DOMAIN, LENS, OUTPUT |
| Explicit workflow pipeline | Declarative GATHER → ANALYZE → REPORT in frontmatter |
| Skill invocation guidance | Phase-to-skill mapping with fallback checks |
| Project-agnostic design | Dynamic context loading from docs/ |
| Output externalization | Dedicated format skill for report templates |
Quick optimization checklist:
- [ ] Skills categorized semantically (not alphabetically) - [ ] Workflow defined as pipeline with phase-to-skill mapping - [ ] Fallback checks provided for skill failures - [ ] No hardcoded project names/paths - [ ] Output template in dedicated skill - [ ] Quality self-check categorized by concern - [ ] Agent size <150 lines
Agent Knowledge Profiles
Agents declare their knowledge profile in YAML front matter to enable validation and discoverability.
See GUIDELINES.md § Artifact Knowledge Rules for full governance.
Required Front Matter Fields
| Field | Purpose | Format |
|---|---|---|
understands | Concepts agent knows | List of paths relative to knowledge/concepts/ |
applies | Implementations agent uses | List of paths relative to knowledge/implementations/ |
Example
--- name: abp-developer understands: - solid/srp - solid/dip - clean-code/naming - clean-architecture/layers applies: - dotnet/solid - dotnet/clean-code ---
Validation Rules
- •Path validation: All
understandspaths must exist inknowledge/concepts/INDEX.md - •Path validation: All
appliespaths must exist inknowledge/implementations/INDEX.md - •Wildcard support: Use
solid/*to include all concepts in a category - •Role requirements: Agents must meet minimum counts for their category
Role Requirements
| Role (folder) | understands (min) | applies (min) |
|---|---|---|
reviewers/ | 3 | 1 |
engineers/ | 2 | 2 |
architects/ | 3 | 0 |
specialists/ | 1 | 0 |
Validation Checklist
When creating or updating agents:
- • All
understandspaths exist in concepts INDEX - • All
appliespaths exist in implementations INDEX - • Agent meets minimum requirements for its role category
- • Skills align with knowledge profile (related domains)
Cross-reference: See ARTIFACT-KNOWLEDGE-MATRIX.md for full coverage.
Success Metrics
Track these for artifact quality:
| Metric | Target |
|---|---|
| Trigger accuracy | Activates on relevant requests |
| Output consistency | Same quality across similar inputs |
| Model compatibility | Works with Haiku, Sonnet, Opus |
| Line count | Skills <500, Agents <150 |
| Description length | 100-1024 chars with triggers |
Quality Checklist
See GUIDELINES.md § Quality Checklists for authoritative checklists.
Quick validation:
- • Description: third-person, 100-1024 chars, 3+ triggers
- • Name: lowercase, hyphens, max 64 chars
- • Under line limits (per GUIDELINES.md)
- • Tested with Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus
Integration Patterns
Command → Agent → Skill
/add-feature (command)
└─ Uses backend-architect (agent)
└─ Applies api-design-principles (skill)
Skill as Knowledge, Command as Action
Rule: "Knowing" = Skill, "Doing" = Command
"Doing with Knowledge" = Command referencing Skills
References
Primary (READ FIRST):
- •
.claude/GUIDELINES.md- Authoritative meta-knowledge for all artifact creation
Skill-Specific:
- •references/skills/skill-types.md - Archetypes
- •references/agents/agent-categories.md - Role definitions
- •references/commands/command-patterns.md - Patterns
- •references/anti-patterns.md - What to avoid
- •references/agent-refactoring-guide.md - Extract from agents
- •references/agent-optimization-patterns.md - Advanced optimization techniques (skill categorization, workflow pipelines, fallback patterns)
Project Context:
- •
CLAUDE.md- Project-specific values and quick references