Python Design and Modularity
Overview
Readability-first design with explicit module contracts. Keep control flow, data movement, and ownership boundaries visible so code stays maintainable and safe to change.
Treat these recommendations as preferred defaults. When a default conflicts with project constraints, suggest a better-fit alternative and call out tradeoffs and compensating controls (tests, observability, migration, rollback).
When to Use
- •Restructuring modules, packages, or ownership boundaries
- •Breaking apart god classes or deeply nested hierarchies
- •Choosing between composition and inheritance
- •Applying Functional Core / Imperative Shell separation
- •Planning a refactor that touches multiple modules
- •Reviewing code for readability or architectural clarity
When NOT to use:
- •Pure performance optimization — see
python-concurrency-performance - •Error handling and resilience patterns — see
python-errors-reliability - •Type contracts and protocol design — see
python-types-contracts - •One-off script or throwaway code with no maintenance horizon
Quick Reference
- •Keep control flow and data movement explicit.
- •Keep module ownership and invariants explicit.
- •Prefer composition by default.
- •Apply Functional Core / Imperative Shell where it improves testability and separation of concerns.
- •Separate behavior changes from structural refactors — never mix in the same commit.
Common Mistakes
- •Refactoring behavior and structure simultaneously — conflates two kinds of risk, makes rollback harder, and obscures review. Do one, then the other.
- •Reaching for inheritance first — deep hierarchies couple unrelated concerns and make reasoning non-local. Default to composition; inherit only when the "is-a" relationship is genuinely stable.
- •Hidden module coupling — importing implementation details across boundaries creates invisible contracts. Expose explicit public APIs and keep internals private.
- •Premature abstraction — extracting a shared interface before the second or third concrete use leads to wrong abstractions that are expensive to undo. Wait for duplication to reveal the real seam.
- •Ignoring the Functional Core / Imperative Shell split — mixing I/O with business logic makes unit testing painful and increases the blast radius of changes. Push side effects to the edges.
Scope Note
- •Treat these recommendations as preferred defaults for common cases, not universal rules.
- •If a default conflicts with project constraints or worsens the outcome, suggest a better-fit alternative and explain why it is better for this case.
- •When deviating, call out tradeoffs and compensating controls (tests, observability, migration, rollback).
Invocation Notice
- •Inform the user when this skill is being invoked by name:
python-design-modularity.
References
- •
references/design-rules.md - •
references/readability-and-complexity.md - •
references/module-boundaries.md - •
references/functional-core-shell.md - •
references/refactor-guidelines.md