AgentSkillsCN

aget-review-artifact

依据既定标准对各类产出物进行审核

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: aget-review-artifact
description: Review artifacts against criteria
archetype: reviewer
allowed-tools:
  - Read
  - Glob
  - Grep

aget-review-artifact

Review artifacts against defined criteria and produce structured feedback. Supports code, documentation, designs, and plans.

Instructions

When this skill is invoked:

  1. •

    Identify Artifact

    • •Type (code, doc, design, plan)
    • •Location
    • •Context
  2. •

    Determine Criteria

    • •Use provided criteria
    • •Or apply standard criteria for artifact type
    • •Document criteria used
  3. •

    Evaluate

    • •Assess against each criterion
    • •Note strengths and issues
    • •Classify findings
  4. •

    Form Recommendation

    • •Approve: Ready as-is
    • •Approve with fixes: Minor issues
    • •Revise: Significant issues
    • •Reject: Fundamental problems

Standard Criteria by Type

Code:

  • •Correctness, Readability, Test coverage, Standards

Documentation:

  • •Accuracy, Completeness, Clarity, Currency

Design:

  • •Requirements coverage, Feasibility, Quality attributes

Plan:

  • •Scope clarity, Feasibility, Risk coverage, V-tests

Output Format

markdown
## Artifact Review: [Name/Path]

### Artifact Info

| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Type | [Code/Doc/Design/Plan] |
| Location | [Path] |
| Reviewer | [Agent] |
| Date | [YYYY-MM-DD] |

---

### Criteria Applied

| Criterion | Weight |
|-----------|--------|
| [Criterion 1] | [High/Med/Low] |
| [Criterion 2] | [High/Med/Low] |

---

### Evaluation

| Criterion | Rating | Notes |
|-----------|--------|-------|
| [Criterion 1] | [Pass/Partial/Fail] | [Details] |
| [Criterion 2] | [Pass/Partial/Fail] | [Details] |

---

### Findings

#### Issues
| Severity | Location | Issue | Suggestion |
|----------|----------|-------|------------|
| Blocking | [Where] | [What] | [How to fix] |
| Suggestion | [Where] | [What] | [Consider] |

#### Strengths
- [Positive observation 1]
- [Positive observation 2]

---

### Recommendation

**Decision**: [Approve / Approve with Fixes / Revise / Reject]

**Rationale**: [Why this decision]

**Required Actions**: (if not Approve)
1. [Action 1]
2. [Action 2]

Constraints

  • •C1: NEVER review without clear criteria — reviews need objective basis
  • •C2: NEVER provide only negative feedback — balanced feedback more effective
  • •C3: NEVER approve artifacts with blocking issues — quality gates must be respected

Related

  • •SKILL-031: aget-review-artifact specification
  • •ONTOLOGY_reviewer.yaml: Review, Artifact, Criteria concepts
  • •CAP-REV-001: Artifact Review capability