R Performance Best Practices
Profiling, benchmarking, and optimization strategies for R code
Performance Tool Selection Guide
When to Use Each Performance Tool
Profiling Tools Decision Matrix
| Tool | Use When | Don't Use When | What It Shows |
|---|---|---|---|
profvis | Complex code, unknown bottlenecks | Simple functions, known issues | Time per line, call stack |
bench::mark() | Comparing alternatives | Single approach | Relative performance, memory |
system.time() | Quick checks | Detailed analysis | Total runtime only |
Rprof() | Base R only environments | When profvis available | Raw profiling data |
Step-by-Step Performance Workflow
r
# 1. Profile first - find the actual bottlenecks
library(profvis)
profvis({
# Your slow code here
})
# 2. Focus on the slowest parts (80/20 rule)
# Don't optimize until you know where time is spent
# 3. Benchmark alternatives for hot spots
library(bench)
bench::mark(
current = current_approach(data),
vectorized = vectorized_approach(data),
parallel = map(data, in_parallel(func))
)
# 4. Consider tool trade-offs based on bottleneck type
When Each Tool Helps vs Hurts
Parallel Processing (in_parallel())
r
# Helps when: # - CPU-intensive computations # - Embarassingly parallel problems # - Large datasets with independent operations # - I/O bound operations (file reading, API calls) # Hurts when: # - Simple, fast operations (overhead > benefit) # - Memory-intensive operations (may cause thrashing) # - Operations requiring shared state # - Small datasets # Example decision point: expensive_func <- function(x) Sys.sleep(0.1) # 100ms per call fast_func <- function(x) x^2 # microseconds per call # Good for parallel map(1:100, in_parallel(expensive_func)) # ~10s -> ~2.5s on 4 cores # Bad for parallel (overhead > benefit) map(1:100, in_parallel(fast_func)) # 100us -> 50ms (500x slower!)
vctrs Backend Tools
r
# Use vctrs when: # - Type safety matters more than raw speed # - Building reusable package functions # - Complex coercion/combination logic # - Consistent behavior across edge cases # Avoid vctrs when: # - One-off scripts where speed matters most # - Simple operations where base R is sufficient # - Memory is extremely constrained # Decision point: simple_combine <- function(x, y) c(x, y) # Fast, simple robust_combine <- function(x, y) vec_c(x, y) # Safer, slight overhead # Use simple for hot loops, robust for package APIs
Data Backend Selection
r
# Use data.table when: # - Very large datasets (>1GB) # - Complex grouping operations # - Reference semantics desired # - Maximum performance critical # Use dplyr when: # - Readability and maintainability priority # - Complex joins and window functions # - Team familiarity with tidyverse # - Moderate sized data (<100MB) # Use base R when: # - No dependencies allowed # - Simple operations # - Teaching/learning contexts
Profiling Best Practices
r
# 1. Profile realistic data sizes
profvis({
# Use actual data size, not toy examples
real_data |> your_analysis()
})
# 2. Profile multiple runs for stability
bench::mark(
your_function(data),
min_iterations = 10, # Multiple runs
max_iterations = 100
)
# 3. Check memory usage too
bench::mark(
approach1 = method1(data),
approach2 = method2(data),
check = FALSE, # If outputs differ slightly
filter_gc = FALSE # Include GC time
)
# 4. Profile with realistic usage patterns
# Not just isolated function calls
Performance Anti-Patterns to Avoid
r
# Don't optimize without measuring # BAD: "This looks slow" -> immediately rewrite # GOOD: Profile first, optimize bottlenecks # Don't over-engineer for performance # BAD: Complex optimizations for 1% gains # GOOD: Focus on algorithmic improvements # Don't assume - measure # BAD: "for loops are always slow in R" # GOOD: Benchmark your specific use case # Don't ignore readability costs # BAD: Unreadable code for minor speedups # GOOD: Readable code with targeted optimizations
Backend Tools for Performance
- •Consider lower-level tools when speed is critical
- •Use vctrs, rlang backends when appropriate
- •Profile to identify true bottlenecks
r
# For packages - consider backend tools # vctrs for type-stable vector operations # rlang for metaprogramming # data.table for large data operations
When to Use vctrs
Core Benefits
- •Type stability - Predictable output types regardless of input values
- •Size stability - Predictable output sizes from input sizes
- •Consistent coercion rules - Single set of rules applied everywhere
- •Robust class design - Proper S3 vector infrastructure
Use vctrs when
Building Custom Vector Classes
r
# Good - vctrs-based vector class
new_percent <- function(x = double()) {
vec_assert(x, double())
new_vctr(x, class = "pkg_percent")
}
# Automatic data frame compatibility, subsetting, etc.
Type-Stable Functions in Packages
r
# Good - Guaranteed output type
my_function <- function(x, y) {
# Always returns double, regardless of input values
vec_cast(result, double())
}
# Avoid - Type depends on data
sapply(x, function(i) if(condition) 1L else 1.0)
Consistent Coercion/Casting
r
# Good - Explicit casting with clear rules
vec_cast(x, double()) # Clear intent, predictable behavior
# Good - Common type finding
vec_ptype_common(x, y, z) # Finds richest compatible type
# Avoid - Base R inconsistencies
c(factor("a"), "b") # Unpredictable behavior
Size/Length Stability
r
# Good - Predictable sizing vec_c(x, y) # size = vec_size(x) + vec_size(y) vec_rbind(df1, df2) # size = sum of input sizes # Avoid - Unpredictable sizing c(env_object, function_object) # Unpredictable length
vctrs vs Base R Decision Matrix
| Use Case | Base R | vctrs | When to Choose vctrs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simple combining | c() | vec_c() | Need type stability, consistent rules |
| Custom classes | S3 manually | new_vctr() | Want data frame compatibility, subsetting |
| Type conversion | as.*() | vec_cast() | Need explicit, safe casting |
| Finding common type | Not available | vec_ptype_common() | Combining heterogeneous inputs |
| Size operations | length() | vec_size() | Working with non-vector objects |
Implementation Patterns
Basic Vector Class
r
# Constructor (low-level)
new_percent <- function(x = double()) {
vec_assert(x, double())
new_vctr(x, class = "pkg_percent")
}
# Helper (user-facing)
percent <- function(x = double()) {
x <- vec_cast(x, double())
new_percent(x)
}
# Format method
format.pkg_percent <- function(x, ...) {
paste0(vec_data(x) * 100, "%")
}
Coercion Methods
r
# Self-coercion
vec_ptype2.pkg_percent.pkg_percent <- function(x, y, ...) {
new_percent()
}
# With double
vec_ptype2.pkg_percent.double <- function(x, y, ...) double()
vec_ptype2.double.pkg_percent <- function(x, y, ...) double()
# Casting
vec_cast.pkg_percent.double <- function(x, to, ...) {
new_percent(x)
}
vec_cast.double.pkg_percent <- function(x, to, ...) {
vec_data(x)
}
Performance Considerations
When vctrs Adds Overhead
- •Simple operations -
vec_c(1, 2)vsc(1, 2)for basic atomic vectors - •One-off scripts - Type safety less critical than speed
- •Small vectors - Overhead may outweigh benefits
When vctrs Improves Performance
- •Package functions - Type stability prevents expensive re-computation
- •Complex classes - Consistent behavior reduces debugging
- •Data frame operations - Robust column type handling
- •Repeated operations - Predictable types enable optimization
Package Development Guidelines
Exports and Dependencies
r
# DESCRIPTION - Import specific functions Imports: vctrs # NAMESPACE - Import what you need importFrom(vctrs, vec_assert, new_vctr, vec_cast, vec_ptype_common) # Or if using extensively import(vctrs)
Testing vctrs Classes
r
# Test type stability
test_that("my_function is type stable", {
expect_equal(vec_ptype(my_function(1:3)), vec_ptype(double()))
expect_equal(vec_ptype(my_function(integer())), vec_ptype(double()))
})
# Test coercion
test_that("coercion works", {
expect_equal(vec_ptype_common(new_percent(), 1.0), double())
expect_error(vec_ptype_common(new_percent(), "a"))
})
Don't Use vctrs When
- •Simple one-off analyses - Base R is sufficient
- •No custom classes needed - Standard types work fine
- •Performance critical + simple operations - Base R may be faster
- •External API constraints - Must return base R types
The key insight: vctrs is most valuable in package development where type safety, consistency, and extensibility matter more than raw speed for simple operations.
Performance Migrations
r
# Old -> New performance patterns for loops for parallelizable work -> map(data, in_parallel(f)) Manual type checking -> vec_assert() / vec_cast() Inconsistent coercion -> vec_ptype_common() / vec_c()